Why Do We Have The Right To Abortion: A Mother's Choice?

However, everything that was ruled by Supreme Court in the Roe v. Wade case was contradicted, In1992, the Supreme court case “...Planned Parenthood V. Casey that said an abortion regulation was unconstitutional if it had 'the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus.'” (Levy). This court ruled that the states had the right to restrict a woman's right to an abortion and prohibit public funding for the poor women that can not afford an abortion.

wade. “Repeated challenges since 1973 narrowed the scope of Roe v. Wade but did not overturn it. In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), the Supreme Court established that restrictions on abortion are unconstitutional if they place an “undue burden” on a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus is viable” (). “Since the roe decision, anti abortion lawmakers have not been able to ban abortion outright. Instead, they have developed a very successful strategy of limiting a woman’s access to the procedure and restricting the procedures that physicians can use to perform it” (76). “The restrictions that were given made life harder for women. All of these laws are meant to dissuade a woman from going through with the abortion. Feminists oppose the restrictions. They view the laws as condescending to women, who they feel know how to make up their own minds about this personal, private decision” (77). “When they eventually make their way back to a clinic, they may be much farther along in the pregnancy, when the procedure becomes more invasive, potentially more dangerous to the mother, and much more expensive” (77). “For some clinics, the expenses brought on by TRAP laws are so high the facilities shut down. By the fall of 2014, only eight abortion clinics in Texas were still standing. Before the law, some 10,000 Texas women had to travel more than 200 miles

The court also recognized that the right to privacy is not absolute and that a state has valid interests in protecting maternal health and protecting potential life. A state is allow to ban abortion after viability, except when it is necessary to protect a woman’s life or health. The ability to make this personal health care decision has also enabled women to pursue educational and employment opportunities that were often denied before the Roe case, The Supreme Court noted that “the ability of women to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation has been facilitated by their ability to control their reproductive lives” (Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 1992). According to the Economist, "Roe v. Wade may have liberated many women; yet it has also trapped America in an irresolvable clash of absolutes. On April 18, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court gave politicians the permission to interfere in the private health care decisions of women and families by creating the first federal law banning abortion procedures. The federal government made a decision to ban and criminalizes abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy . This ban affects more than just the women who need second-trimester abortions due to the fact that the Court's decision dismissed more than 30 years of precedent that prioritize women’s health when it came to laws that cast restriction on abortions. In the states that have passed laws similar to this, many women and their families were put into agonizing and tragic situations; being unable to end a pregnancy for serious medical reasons (Federal and State Bans and Restrictions on Abortion). As Politicians across the country succeed in restricting access to abortion, women are facing the consequences. Laws that restrict access to abortion hurt women's

The reproductive rights of women have always been a hotly debated topic between those who support a women’s right to an abortion and those who vehemently oppose it. The United States Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Roe vs. Wade that it was legally a woman’s right to have an abortion in 1973, and clearly outlines that states “cannot pass laws that create an undue burden” for women who choose to exercise their rights and terminate their pregnancy. Since then, there have been consistent challenges from many states along with pro-life organizations all over the country to find ways to limit and to control the reproductive rights of women. In 1992, even though the ruling of Roe vs. Wade was confirmed in the case of Planned Parenthood vs. Casey, the Supreme Court also ruled that states can create regulations to limit abortions in order to protect the safety and health of the mother and the life of the unborn fetus. The outcome has resulted in several traditionally conservative states including Arkansas, Texas, North Dakota and Indiana passing laws that are cleverly disguised as rules to protect women, but ultimately makes it extremely difficult if not all together impossible for women to seek a legal abortion.

Pro life although, support the idea that every child has a right to live, even if the mother is not financially able to aid the child and the child would struggle everyday along with their mother. These children would be underprivileged and could potentially die from the circumstances they’d be forced to live in. To some countries it’s a burdensome issue to be talked about, whereas other countries have come to a stand to where they are on the spectrum on this subject. Norma McCorvey, known as Jane Roe, was a Texas local who needed to obtain an abortion. The Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant mother’s life. She had soon had given birth but only to give up the baby for adoption. Ever since she has come forward and changed sides on the abortion debate. As she filed her case to the U.S. Supreme Court, she received support from many women and of course, displeasure from others. In 1973, the landmark decision had been made that abortion would be legal in the U.S but may be restricted by the states to varying degrees under the Fourteenth amendment to the Constitution. Pro-choice defends and protects the people, it is ultimately the woman’s life that would be affected, who would the government be to take that away from the people? We live in a developed country based on freedoms, and women have and should continue to have the freedom to hat choice. Women have the right to their own body just as the same as people have to make their own decisions. If the government controls women’s choices on abortion, before you know it, the government will control other personal decisions that people make; like getting plastic surgery, how much they weigh, ect. The government should not dictate people’s judgements and solutions to their issues. As statistics have shown, it is estimated that there are 43 million abortions a year. It

Doe (1977), page 397. Taking place in St. Louis, the court was determining the constitutional ability of a city to restrict public funds to public hospitals from contributing to non-therapeutic abortions. The court had to determine if this restriction was violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and a woman’s right to an abortion in the state. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the policy was not unconstitutional because it did not entirely restrict a woman’s right to an abortion. Abortions were still available in state to woman who needed them. Also argued in Missouri was Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Ashcroft (1983), page 393. The case brought by Kansas City Planned Parenthood clinics challenged four regulations in Missouri regarding abortion: (1) abortions after 12 weeks must be performed in a hospital, (2) pathology reports are required for each abortion, (3) a second physician must be present for abortions performed after viability, and (4) minors must secure parental consent or the consent of the court for an abortion. The court held that (1) the states requirement of abortions to be held in a hospital was unconstitutional because it unnecessarily interfered with a woman’s constitutional right to obtain an abortion. All of the other requirements were deemed constitutional. The second challenged regulation was constitutional because it placed no undue burden on the right to obtain an abortion and did not

In 1992, Roe v. Wade was upheld in Casey v. Planned Parenthood. However, the Supreme Court had become significantly more conservative in that time, and this ruling favored the states‘ rights to establish tighter abortion restrictions. In Pennsylvania, women were only permitted first trimester abortions if they had been given information about the fetus’s gestational state and the dangers of having the procedure. A married women was also required to inform her husband prior to having the abortion, and minors had to seek approval from at least one parent unless given a legal bypass. On top of these restrictions, there was also a mandatory 24-hour waiting period (McBride, “Casey v. Planned Parenthood”).

When I think about abortion, I am pro choice. I believe in being pro choice because women should have the right to choose if they would like to hold a baby for 9 long months or not to hold the baby. Although there are certain circumstances about having an abortion is most advocate. For example, if a woman is walking on street, and gets sexually assaulted (raped) and soon later finds out she is pregnant, she should decide if she wants to have her attackers child. That is why I believe it should be a woman's decision to be able to keep the child, and not a law to decide. Beliefs should not make an impact on decision that's someone might feel is

People who oppose abortion who believe women have abortions for their own convenience belittle the trauma women go through when making this decision. Motherhood cannot be undervalued. It is a lifelong responsibility. The baby has never asked to be born so the responsibility lies with the women carrying it, to provide it with a decent life. If for whatever reason the baby is not welcome, the woman has the right to terminate the

Whether a person would choose to obtain an abortion for themselves, does not provide them for the right to make a decision about what another individual would choose to do. Personally I am a Pro-choice supporter and support any woman who deems that an abortion is the right decision based on her individual circumstances. The ethical dilemma of abortion will not be disappearing anytime soon, because of the strong emotions of

I disagree completely with the idea of abortion being illegal. I also disagree with the government having the right to decide for any woman what she can or cannot do with her body. I am pro-choice. By pro-choice this means that I believe that a woman can and should be able to safely obtain an abortion without being harrassed by pro-life picketers or potentially injured by unregulated procedures or unqualified doctors. Licensed clinics should be set up throughout all 50 states and should be treated by state medical inspectors the way any other surgical establishment is monitored.

My research essay will discuss the controversial topic of a women’s right to make the decision to have an abortion. I will analyze many aspects of abortion such as, the history, government interference, possible limitations on the amount, cost, if it should be discussed in schools, the ban of Plan B, statistics, moral standpoint, protestors, role in other countries and the role it plays in our society. Overall, I believe that women should have the right to choose to have an abortion or not. This is a touchy and personal subject that has been debated for decades. Complex topics always intrigue me and provide me with the opportunity to enhance my knowledge. By choosing this I’m able to see other points of views and angles that perhaps I was unable

In the whole abortion argument, I considered both sides of the arguments but I believe that the mother should be the one who ultimately has the decision of whether they want an abortion but if the father is in the picture he should be able to give his opinion as this is his life which is going to be affected.The argument that I lean towards most is the one that women should have absolute rights over their own bodies which is the principle of individual freedom.(Chapter 11,page 222). There tends to be in life an inequality thats reach is vast in this instance being gender with how the possibly to be mother is wrong for terminating the pregnancy.This argument is opposed to the other arguments which make assumptions about how this will affect the woman’s body or that the mother does not have the right to terminate the pregnancy as it's developing into a life. The topic of abortion has been seen in past cases like roe vs wade, and current situations which includes the Mexico city act further named the the Global gag rule( ).

Abortion is an option like being good or bad. It’s an option every woman can do if needed or wanted. For example if the soon to be mother/father don’t have enough money or are not ready to be parents they can abort the soon to become child. If they don’t wish to abort then don’t do it right? Well there are some people that say otherwise. Abortion doesn’t have to be done if not wanted. Image if they kept the child, the child would have a poor life without having what it needs. Sure the parent could put it for adoption but you’re not 100% sure she/he would get adopted. These are the reasons why I believe women should have the choice to abort.

I’m pro-life for the obvious reason people are pro-life...I believe the unborn child is a life and the most vulnerable and innocent of human beings at that. As a living being an unborn child would have an individual right, like the rest of us, to live and must rely on us born folks to protect them. However, I believe that it must often be an unfathomably difficult situation and decision for a woman considering abortion and I have compassion not judgment for her.