Why Is Animal Research Cruel

Although some people believe animal testing is beneficial to humans, animals go through torture during the testing progress, and it is unethical. Marjie Lundstrom, a UC Davis researcher explains, “An incident at the University of California, three baby mice were found sealed alive in a plastic baggie and left unattended” (Animaltesting.com). This quote proves animals suffer during the testing progresses, and humans think the pain of the animals is okay. To clarify these baby mice were being abused and they were in an unethical situation. According to Human Society International, an undercover investigation site states, “animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other

Animal Testing is widely known to be cruel and inhumane. Many animals suffer due to scientists wanting to test their products on them to benefit humans. The Humane Society International stated that animals that are experimented on are usually force fed, forces inhalation, deprivation of food and water.

Most of the animals use in research are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. Those animals like birds and mice are not protected because for the federal law, these animals are not in the animal category. The worst part of this is that those animals that are not protected are the ones most often used for testing. This animals are tortured in many ways and law does not do anything to protect them. In fact, even the animals that are protected by the AWA are harmed. They are exposed to a lot of harmful procedures. It have been cases were the same animals harm their selves due to all the stress they have to pass by. Imagine how much stress one need to be to be able to cause pain to itself.

Approximately 225 million animals are used for testing every year. Billions have been killed in the process. ("Questions and Answers About Biomedical Research.”) How can this be allowed? Isn’t it cruel to use animals to test products for humans? Many animal rights activists say, “yes” to this question. However, scientists argue it is necessary and animal research can help save human lives. There are probable arguments for both sides. But the dangers of using animals to test products for human use weighs an even greater risk than not using the animals. Alternatives are much more ethical.

At this time and age animals are used like slaves placed in captivity in dark, dusty and dirty cells only to be brought and put through cruel ,painful and inhumane tests. It is cruel to put unprotected animals through such experiments. I also believe it is unethical to make animals live life in a lab cage and intentionally put through harm isolation and distress. We all know how bad it is to feel fearful, frightened and terrified.

An estimated 25 million or more animals are used yearly in the U.S. These animals are commonly used in biomedical research as “models” for human disease, they are also used in basic biomedical research which is research for general understanding. Not only are animals used in biomedical research but, behavioral research as well, such as psychology and addiction studies, military, space, and agricultural research, product development and drug testing, as well as science education. Animals shouldn’t be used for such testing, these tests are unethical, inhumane and completely unnecessary. Thousands of animals suffer and die every day in laboratories around the world. In most states, abuse or cruelty towards animals is illegal. A person can face up to 7 years in prison and a fine of maximum $235,600. If it is illegal for cruelty to be conducted on animals why does it make it okay in the name of science?

One reason that it isn’t ethical to do scientific research on animals is because animals are killed each year. About 20 million animals are experimented and killed annually. LIke I said before animals are starved, shocked, burned, and poisoned as scientists look for something that just might yield some human benefit. In one case, baby mice had their legs chopped off so that experimenters could observe whether they 'd learn to groom themselves with their stumps. In another, polar bears were submerged in a tank of crude oil and salt water to see if they 'd live. And, for those experiments which do have merit, there exist many non-animal alternatives. We don’t need animals to die. When scientists test

To begin with how cruel this is lets think about what exactly these scientists do. Some of the things they do to these animals are absolutely disgusting like poisoning, shocking, burning, and killing animals. The thing is they do this EVERYDAY, yet if we did this outside the laboratory it would be a felony.

According to Animal Testing- ProCon, since 1966, research animals have been protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). They provide minimum housing standards like enclosures, temperature, clean water and food, and more. Inspections by veterinarians are required by the Animal Welfare Act to maintain animal health (Animal Testing-ProCon, 2017). Animal Testing-ProCon also says that to use animals for research, it has to be approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Who enforce humane treatment for the research animals (Animal Testing-ProCon,

The most popular argument made against researching on animals is that it is cruel and inhumane. The methods researchers use on animals are very painful. Animals used in experiments are commonly force-fed, forced inhalation of any substance, food and water deprived, prolonged periods of restraint, and purposely caused burns and other wounds to study the healing process. A test that shows its cruelty towards animals is the Draize test. This test involves rabbits; the rabbits are used to evaluate the eyes reaction to cosmetic products. This test involves having the rabbit’s eyelids being held open by clips for multiple days so they wont blink away the product. The test is used to measure

The Animal Welfare Act is the only United States law that covers animals used as research. This law passed in 1966, regulates “the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers.” The USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) is in charge with enforcing the Animal Welfare Act. Under the AWA, it restricts the USDA from preventing animal testing within laboratories along with allowing, “any experiments regardless of the amount of pain or distress they might cause.” The majority of animals such as: mice, rats and birds that are used as experimentation are excluded in the AWA, leaving them the opportunity to suffer in the laboratories. The figure above shows the different types of species being tested on in only 2015. Note that mice, rats, and birds don’t fall into a separate category and are considered as “all other animals,” yet it is the third highest number being tested on. It is left to the laboratories responsibility to ensure that all animals are living in clean, healthy environments. However, with only being inspected once or twice a year, it’s very easy to find loopholes around caring for the

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

The only law that has been created to regulate animal treatment is the Animal Welfare Act, according to InfoBase learning, “the law does not, however, ban the infliction of pain on animal subjects outright. Additionally, the Animal Welfare Act covers only dogs, cats, primates, rabbits, hamsters, and guinea pigs. It does not cover mice, rats, or birds.” While this law does set restrictions on animal testing, it does not cover all species used for research. Through this act, select animals are provided minimal protection, while the other animals are excluded. The animals that do receive the protection are still mistreated and abused, while the animals that are unaffected by the law are still being mistreated, to a greater degree. The animals deserve much better treatment and unfortunately have no control over whether or not they will be tested on. Because of the problems surrounding animal experimentation, limitations should be placed on animal testing because of ethical standards, unreliability, and existing alternative methods.

There are several types of animals being used for research, but not surviving the test. Animals are similar to human beings; they have hearts just like human beings. Researchers have absolutely no sympathy for these animals, including the vicious ones. All animals need some type of affection from humans, or else there is a high possibility the animals will not survive. Personally, animal researching should be banned, but doing so, the researchers would have to find something else or someone else to test the products on to make sure the products are useable to humans.

Just in the United States, it is estimated that just over twenty-five million animals are used each year for animal research. These animals range anywhere from mice and rabbits to farm animals, those such as sheep, pigs and even dogs and cats. Once an experiment is done, the animal is either euthanized or used for additional experiments. Animal research is morally wrong because these animals go through inhumane procedures, it leaves the animal diseased, exhausted and may even lead the animals to death.