Why Is There Evil Do Humans Have Free Will Analysis

The Problem of Evil is one of the most influential and common arguments in modern philosophy against the existence of a Greater Being, God (Trakakis, 2006). Both Theist, those who believe in the existence of God, and Atheist, those who don’t believe in the existence of God, argue that evil exists in the world. The Problem of Evil explores whether the existence of evil and suffering constitutes significance evidence for atheism. When looking at the definition of the greater being, most refer to the Omni-god in which is Omnipotent, Omniscient and Omnibenevolent, meaning God is all powerful, all knowing and all good. Atheist Philosophers therefore argue that no Omnipotent, Omniscient, Omnibenevolent greater being would allow evil and

There are many theories why people could do evil things. Is it because they were abused or had a rough childhood? What if the society isn’t to blame at all for their behavior? (Olivia Goldhill “Are Some Humans born evil?”) People say people are born evil or people who are born good turn evil. This topic has been studied for many years and many people have different opinions about it. A person may say they don’t believe that people are born evil. Another person may think that people are born evil or good people turn evil. An example is babies aren’t born evil. Their minds are wonderful. Their minds are innocent and they don’t know much. A person can’t possibly be born evil. It really depends sometimes how a person is raised or what that person experiences in life.

A new born baby is not born with sinful thoughts. Babies are axiomation of purity and innocence . Experiences such as a bad childhood, neglect by parents, abuse, power changes humans into being evil. How someone is nurtured also determines if they will become good or evil. Ego, lust, jealousy, betrayal, failure, and greed are some causes of evil.One is not born evil.

Evil people are found throughout the entire world. Young or old, small or large, evil people exist all around the world. Rather hurting other people or animals, these acts are inhumane and abnormal. Any act of violence is wrong, but actually harming or killing other people or animals is over the line. Evil has been studied for thousands of years, and the root question is always, is evil born or made? Children can be completely normal and be a great child, and as they reach middle adulthood they could fall off the deep end.

After reading Article 1, Aquinas for Armchair Theologians by Timothy M. Renick most can automatically acquire that Thomas Aquinas was a very influential thinker amongst others when explaining his theological views. His religious views may have differed from others during his time, however, it did influence and encourage others on the different topics of God vs. Satan, and why God has not all the answers, and powers when making sure every human being should not face evil. Aquinas believed that Christians needed to view their basic beliefs in another way to make sense of their own faith when questioning all that God did for each individual. The real question to all this, which a lot of people even question today is “Why is their evil in the World?”

An argument against the existence of God is based on the presence of evil in the world. This deductively valid argument is divided into two categories; human action and natural evil (Sober, 2005, p. 120). Human action discusses how experiences makes us better people, while natural evil are tragic events that are not under the control of humans. Each category is used as evidence to refute God as an all-powerful omniscient, omnibenevolent, or omnipotent being. In order to understand the strengths of this argument, it is important for an overall assessment of how the presence of evil questions if a Supreme Being actually exists, by arguing why a being of all-good would allow evil, importance of evil in a good world, and questioning God’s intervention in evil.

In the Possibility of evil this book has very many twist and turns all through out this story . With revenge and karma just around the corner. In the Possibility of Evil by shirley jackson it is clear that what goes around comes around comes because she wrote mean letter to her neighbors, which caused them to cut down and destroy her garden; but she was also mean and rude to the kids in her neighborhood. The counter claim in this story is treat other the way you want to be treated. In this story the theme is what goes around comes around, and karma coming back at you.

The second chapter found in The Problem of Evil, begins to address the logical problem of evil. Within this chapter Evans breaks down Alvin Plantinga and the free-will defense. Here Evans compares the logical arguments of J.L. Mackie and Alvin Plantinga. Mackie uses a deductive argument to state that if God is all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-good, then evil cannot exist. This would be a contradiction to logic. Plantinga provides a valid argument involving free will to make the case for the existence for evil. Evans uses the remainder of the chapter to compare and contrast the two views.

His argument for God seems to give reasons that there is no evil in the world. He states that God is an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent, then he must have the ability to stop something bad happen and make the world become better. In most cases, there always have many evils happen such as murder, rob, rape, and stealing. If God does exist, he will not allow those evils and suffering happen because he wants everything to be good. While God doesn’t stop evils happen, so he urges that God is not existing in the world and the existence of God is only

Being a spiritual person who has grown up in a Catholic home, God is very important to me and is the one I turn to and pray to in times of despair. However, in many situations it has been seen throughout the world that society blames God for difficult moments. Society has questioned God “if he really existed why would he allow such evil things to happen”, now the question why do bad things happen to good people is one that I also question myself.

How can God be good, omniscient and omnipotent if there is still natural evil in this world. The main defense to such a claim is the existence of another supernatural evil being, the Devil. The Devil, as is traditionally believed, was an angel created by God and provided with free will, and since free will is uncontrollable by God, the Devil is able to bring upon natural disasters which fall under moral evil in this case and therefore it does not contradict the free will theodicy. Another argument to the natural evil issue is St. Augustines argument.

Aquinas then argues that by understanding the essences of God’s creations, humans are able to derive that He is, but are not able to understand His essence. Thus, Man’s knowledge is lacking and humans are left with a natural desire to seek the First Cause. According to Aquinas’ first observation, Man is unable to be perfectly

Humans are inherently evil and cruel. Take a look at any media outlet and you will see stories about violence. Terrorism is a big topic right now. However, there are more types of violence happening. Bullying in schools, assaults and shootings at places of worship, and overall just general racism, sexism, and

Ordinarily, two separate quotes offered during the beginning of the first objection both try to rationalize why evil would exist in the world. Comparatively, Epicurus offers his idea through two thought processes. Subjectively, he claims that if God wishes well in the world, but cannot stop evil, he is inadequate. Furthermore, he states that if he has the power to demolish evil, but chooses not to, then God is malevolent. Nevertheless, he leads to a question in his argument, where, if God wants to demolish evil and has the ability, why hasn’t he completed his task. Alternatively, John Stott identifies the fact of suffering to be one of the greatest challenges to Christianity over many generations. Thus, its varying severity, and delivery seem

Logical problem explains that if evil exists then there must be no God. God is said to be all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-good. If God is morally perfect then God should have the desire to eliminate all evil, but evil still exists. The two, evil and God are inconsistent with each other. The evidential problem explains that there is an unnecessary evil in this world, and if God existed there would be no such thing. Therefore God is nonexistent.