Why Is To Kill A Mockingbird Better Than The Book

In comparison with the many similarities in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird, there are also many differences. One huge difference that was almost impossible to miss, was the absence of Aunt Alexandra. Atticus' sister, Alexandra, was the thorn in Scout's side throughout the book. She always wanted Scout to act more like a lady. Towards the end, she became more like a mother in soothing Scout and trying to reassure her that Jem was not dead. I think Aunt Alexandra was a huge part of the story, and I think they should have kept her in the movie. Be that as it may, the movie moved along quite well without her. I also found there to be huge differences in the trial. For example, although Mayella Ewell, pretended to be very upset by Atticus' questioning, she did not accuse him of mocking her. I thought that this was somewhat significant because it was one of Mayella's tactics for trying to get pity from the jury. A more minor difference, was the combination of Miss Maudie and Miss Rachel. The two neighbors of the Finches were combined into one person for the movie. I do not think it mattered very much, because they served the same purpose in the end. They were there as comfort to Atticus and the children. A larger difference in the movie pertained to Mrs. Dubose. Mrs. Dubose did make a small appearance in the movie, but her role was cut down quite a bit from what it was originally in the book. Mrs. Dubose, a morphine addict,

In the novel Jem reads to Mrs. Dubois which is where Jem begins to acknowledge the racism going on after Mrs. Dubois calls Atticus a “NIgger Lover” and the film just missed an important plot to the storyline because not once does Jem read to Mrs. Dubois. Jem and Scout walk home with Atticus after the case with Tom Robinson but in the book Calpurnia walks him telling Atticus the kids are missing and without even knowing they were up where the color people section was. Calpurnia later walks them home nagging at them about how they're in trouble and Aunt Alexandra was worried as well scared. It was interesting how this was left out of film. It's not expected a maid comes in during a trial and tells one of the lawyers their kids are missing when they're actually watching the trial. Mrs. Maudie's house burns down in the book but was left out in the movie. It would of been nice to see a house burn down in a film but it wasn't a big deal because it didn't really affect anything in the

The classic To Kill a Mockingbird has many differences from its movie. These changes touch on many themes of the book such as prejudice. Even though the book is fairly different from the movie, the movie can still impact the watcher greatly today. The movie might be missing some parts, but the main idea is still

To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is a multi-faceted novel which explores the principles and morals of people in the South during the 1930s. Mockingbirds are symbolic of the people that society abuse. Lee narrates the events of the novel using Scout’s voice and uses this technique to add emotional context and develop themes. Themes of racial and classist prejudice are developed by Lee to challenge the reader. These techniques are all powerful ways to alter the views of the reader.

In the beginning of the movie, it opens up with Scout singing and drawing/coloring. The first thing I noticed was the way the audience meets Dill in the book and the movie. In the book, we meet Dill relatively late and in the movie we meet him almost as soon as the movie starts. Dill is a key character and we don’t get to see that as much as I intended too. A few

One character that was missing from the movie that played an important role was Aunt Alexandra. First of all by having Aunt Alexandra in the film the reader doesn't see the feminine side to Scout instead only Scout's tomboy side is portrayed. Also, not having Aunt Alexandra around means there is no one to challenge Atticus's authority. Without Aunt Alexandra, Miss Stephanie is also left out. Seeing how Jem and Scout act around another family member is impossible when the directors' cut Aunt Alexandra out of the movie. Showing how the children act around another family member could show different sides of their personalities. A good explanation for leaving Aunt Alexandra out could be that the movie would have just been too long with too many extra parts that may have not been necessary. Rachael Haverford, the Finches' next door neighbor, was another character deleted from the book, Dill was not living with .The movie and the book have differences in the overall way the characters appear. For instance, Jem isn't nearly as physically fit in the movie as he is described in the book. Also in the book Scout is the main character and in the movie Scout doesn't really know what's going on. All of the scenes in the movie that present Scout as anything more than the narrator were cut out. In the book, Scout is more of a girl caught in the middle of Atticus and Alexandria. She acts a lot like Alexandria although she doesn't know it.

As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.

To Kill A Mockingbird” is marvelous and unforgettable novel. The novel shows what a dramatic old town such as Maycomb is like. In Lee’s unique writings, she integrates large conflicts concerning major political issues in the South. Not only

In to kill a mockingbird there are many important scenes that were different, scenes that were the similar but different and scenes that were in one and not the other.

Neither the novel nor film version of To Kill A Mockingbird is superior to the other, just different. In the book you delve more into the separate characters while in the film you see the relationships in action. The book gives you a broader view of everything, but at the same time the movie points out everything that seems important. Lastly, the novel shows Scout as a girl caught in the middle, when the movie seems to paint Scout as a girl without a inkling of what is going on.

To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is a beloved novel published in 1960. After reading the novel there were some moments and people that I found particularly enjoyable. My favorite part of the novel was when the children went to Boo Radley's house to try to get a look at him. In addition, Atticus Finch was my favorite character in the novel. In my opinion the book was very good. I felt that it really showed the thoughts and actions, both good and bad, of the people in the South during the time of the Great Depression. At some points it was sad and at others it was comical but overall it conveyed the message that it was trying to send and everyone could learn something from it.

To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee is a beautiful story depicting a family living in the South of the 1930’s, and their struggle against the prejudice which was common to that time. The book centers on Atticus Finch, the father of the family as well as a lawyer, and his fight against prejudice. We see the story unfold through the innocent eyes of his young daughter, Scout, who is free from prejudice and not yet jaded. By viewing events as Scout sees them, the author shows us how to overcome prejudices, and gain tolerance.

In the book To Kill a Mockingbird the movie made three major changes. By doing so this changed the way Harper Lee was trying to get her message about racism out to the world. The first way it was changed was when Calpurnia went to get the kids during Tom’s trial. The Second was the absence of characters throughout the movie. And finally the third was when the kids went to see Boo Radley.

In To Kill a Mockingbird, author Harper Lee uses memorable characters to explore civil rights and the racism in the segregated Southern States of the 1930s. The story takes place in a small southern town in Alabama called Maycomb. The county itself was also called Maycomb as well. There were specific locations that were used in most of the book, which were the houses of the main characters, Finch’s Landing, the Maycomb court room and the Radly house. The time period of this book was around 1935. The film is as much a classic as the novel itself. The film received eight Academy Awards nominations as well as awards for Best Actor and Best Screenplay. The novel and the movie version complement each other on various levels. However, the

Harper Lee is the author of a very beloved book known as To Kill a Mockingbird. This book resonates with us because it brings issues into the light that, at the time, were difficult to discuss. To Kill a Mockingbird, is incredibly different from her other book newer novel Go Set a Watchman. She originally wrote Go Set a Watchman, and then it was her publisher that told her the story would have a greater impact if set from a younger Scout’s perspective. How the publisher was able to see the potential that the story had, I find to be fascinating. Personally, I did not enjoy Go Set a Watchman like I did To Kill a Mockingbird. I feel that this is partly due to the order of how we read the books. It is the same scenario as it was when we read the novel first then watched the movie with To Kill a Mockingbird. Our entire view would be altered because both conveyed the same story but used different techniques. I do not know how much we would have enjoyed reading Go Set a Watchman even if