Why Is Trump Travel Banned

Don’t Discriminate ` Has anyone ever violated your human rights or taken away your rights? Donald Trump has violated the human rights for the U.S. wrestlers to travel to Iran despite travel ban. By executive order from president Donald trump had took the rights of the U.S wrestlers to compete next month in Iran, one of the seven countries whose citizens were temporarily banned from the U.S. Donald Trump’s ban has affected and was inhumane. He has discriminated the rights for the Iranians to compete

support by statute or the Constitution (Pate, 2017). Newly elected President, Donald J. Trump, has caused protests across the nation and parts of the world due to his controversial orders. Without a doubt, the most controversial of Trump’s orders deals with immigration and how he will put an end to terrorism on U.S. soil. On January 27, President Trump signed an

Donald Trump’s first executive orders was to cease all immigration into the country for 90 to 120 days- Syrians are banned indefinitely. To add to the already heinous crime, Trump’s policy is to focus on Christian immigrants. This action is not only and odious, disgusting act, but it’s also illegal. The decision to enact the travel ban caused chaos on an

little bit better in some way. The 1st amendment deals with the most commonly known laws, such as: The freedom of speech, the freedom of press, freedom to peacefully assemble, freedom to petition, and lastly freedom of religion. The 1st amendment is why our

was banned from entering the United States? Imagine if your cousin wants to escape their politically, unstable country in order to survive, but not be allowed to? Recently, President Donald Trump has created various executive orders to restrict immigrants from entering the United States of America. One of the most influential executive order that was made included a travel ban on immigrants and refugees from certain Muslim-dominant nations in the Middle East. Trump has established this travel ban

James Nelson, “Legal Scholars: Why Congress Should Impeach Donald Trump”, a retired Justice of Montana supreme court makes a great argument as to how Donald Trump hasn’t been upholding the constitution and why he should be impeached. His article talks about how he is letting business interests interfere with his presidency. John Nichols, “Congressional Democrats are already warning Trump about Impeachment”, a novelist has a similar article on the same topic, but Nichols goes more in detail into the

religion based treatment that violates both the Constitution's establishment clause and the Geneva Conventions’ mandate against denying refugees asylum, Trump created a controversial problem that produced a divide between not only American citizens,

about securing our borders from immigrants he claims are may pose a threat to our nation. On reason this topic is so highly debated is it affects employment, crime, and many other large topics that touch everyone who lives in the country. Ever since Trump formally launched his campaign on June 16, 2015 one of his main topics to speak on are immigration and how he’s going to secure

one of the reasons why it is is because of Trump. Trump is America’s 45th president, but most of the media resent him. In my opinion, I think the media is sometimes unfair to Trump since it can occasionally go overboard and exaggerate the atrocious behavior in Trump, but it’s also Trump’s fault for his erroneous and impulsive resolutions, which makes the media dislike him. One reason why I consider the media is treating Trump unfairly is due to the media overemphasizing what Trump does. They only highlight

On January 27, 2017, Trump passed a law banning immigrants and citizens from seven countries. The countries include Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, nations composed of a Muslim majority. Many people believe Trump’s Muslim country ban was not sufficient in performing its rightful task of keeping terrorists out of the country. Trump’s ban was not necessary due to the problem the situation causes, such as its sudden implication, deterioration of presidential image, and overall effectiveness