Why Should The United States Have A Better Constitution?

One strength of the UK constitution is the flexibility that it has, for the reason that the constitution is uncodified or unwritten and is therefore not entrenched in law. Due to the fact that the UK’s constitution is uncodified or unwritten, it has an opportunity to modernise itself to the ever changing society or any other new circumstances that may arise. An example of the flexibility of the UK’s

The Differences Betweek the UK and US Constitutions The constitution of a state, at its most basic, can be described as the fundamental principles from which it is governed, usually defining how power is split up within it and thereby constructing a framework within which it operates (www.oed.com). In this essay, I will first provide a brief summary of the UK and US constitutions and then attempt to outline the key differences and similarities between the two and discuss whether the differences really do pale in comparison with the fundamental similarities. Queen Elizabeth the 2nd once said, “The British constitution has always puzzled me” (Hennessy, 1996) and this certainly becomes

On June 12, 1776, the Continental Congress appointed a committee, consisting of one delegate from each of the thirteen states, for the purpose of setting up a cohesive Federal Government. Headed by John Dickinson, the committee presented a draft of the Articles of Confederation to Congress a month later. Though the Articles were not officially ratified until five years later, Congress began operating under them in 1777. The delay that occurred during the years from drafting to ratification was partially caused by the opening of a multi-faceted debate that encompassed the issues of representation for citizens, the balance of power within the country, and state sovereignty. Densely-populated states wanted a system of representation based on

Amending the United States Constitution is no easy feat thanks to the Framers. They believed a Constitution should endure what Chief Justice Marshall would later call “a Constitution for the ages" (Finkelman). Members of Congress have proposed more than 10,000 amendments, but there have been only 17 amendments to the U.S. Constitution Since 1791. The difficulty in proposing amendments has not dampened politicians' desire to address issues they feel strongly about, such as flag burning and same-sex marriage.

The United States has established a baseline for all human beings to go by. This baseline, or what politics claims as basic human rights, protects all citizens of the U.S. against evil doings. When the U.S. created the Constitution, human rights were being ignored. People were not treated like people, more like cattle, actually. The corporeal reasoning behind this was skin color and poverty. The First Amendment protects any citizen against prosecution if they were to speak, do, or write something that someone else does not like. Some of these rights are the Freedom of Speech, the Freedom of Protest, and the Freedom of Religion.

People of any country, as citizens, have certain civil rights as well as responsibilities, and the United States of America is no exception. The US Constitution defines the framework. It is the supreme law of the land that defines how Federal Government works.

America is a nation founded on freedom, and at times that freedom will get tested, however the people of this great country always make tough decisions that will influence and shape the future of our society. That is why the U.S. Constitution was put in place it is a stable of change, because the founders knew nothing in the world is completely perfect, yet with time things will change and the people must adapt to the times. The preamble introduces the constitution, and states that the government comes from the people. Its general purposes are in order to form a more perfect union we have to “Establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” Its purpose is to make a good government and good laws, have peace in our homes, national security, healthy communities, and freedom to ourselves, families and friends. The people are the ones who must choose the elected officials and leaders who enforce this constitution, they have all the power in the world, because the Constitution allows them to pursue their happiness. As Benjamin Franklin once said “The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.” The Constitution does not give you rights, because the founders considered your rights to be "God-given" or "natural rights" you are born with all your rights. What the Constitution does, however, is protect your

A constitution is a set of rules that defines the manner a country is run. The British constitution is said to be an unwritten constitution, more accurately it is uncodified as much more of the British constitution is written down, however, they are not all written down in a single document like a codified constitution would require as how the US is, however draws from several different sources such as; statutes laws, common law, conventions, EU laws, authoritative documents etc. Statute law, is a written law passed down by parliament for example the human rights act of 1998 which brought the European convention on human rights into British law, conventions is another

Due to the hyperpastrsian era that Congress has been subject to, a bill simply advocating for transparency in election funding was rejected. However, it's important to examine the utility and durability of the bill if it would have been passed under these specific circumstances. Adler and Wilkerson hold that there certain factors at the time of legislation passage that will predict whether or not it will be amended in the future. The factors that have been proven to be statistically significant are: whether or not the government was divided at the time of passage, if there were subsequent chamber differences, mood of the policy, the complexity of the law, and whether or not it pertains sunset provisions(Adler and Wilkerson 178). Looking at

“We as a country are supposed to be weak and fragmented as federal govt,” are what the Founding Fathers intended. However, later on there became an environmental shift. How did we become the most powerful entity that has existed in the world when we were supposed to be so weak?

A More Perfect Union by Dr. Ben Carson, M.D. demonstrates the absolute importance of the Constitution and the original intent the founding fathers had for this uniquely American document. Throughout his book, Dr. Carson examines the history of the Constitution, as well as certain aspects of the Constitution that have been intentionally misconstrued by liberal activists for their own agendas and, whether they are aware of the consequences of their actions, to the detriment of America.

The United States is entirely a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source...When the Government reaches out to punish a citizen who is abroad, the shield which the Bill of Rights and other parts of the Constitution provide to protect his life and liberty should not be stripped away just because he happens to be in another land.

A constitution is a set of rules which may be written or unwritten, establishes the distribution of power in a political system, the limits of government jurisdiction, the rights of citizens and the method of amending the constitution itself. An uncodified constitution is unwritten, or at least not written all in one document. The constitution in the UK is found in a variety of sources which are mainly statute and common law, conventions and traditions, European law etc. There are arguments for the UK to both retain an uncodified constitution and to change this to a codified constitution like the USA. Some of the arguments for retaining the uncodified system are that; codification produces

However, just because there is a written constitution does not ensure the rights of a countries citizens will receive their rights – rather, it could lead to an elective dictatorship which might further restrict rights and may go on to persecute some of its citizens, which happened in Germany and resulted in the Second World War.

Human rights are the inherent of freedom, even though if it’s nationality, place residence, religion or ethnic origin. Human rights are still struggling in South Africa because people there are still violence actions been occurred. There are two massive problems in South Africa that happens to be a major problem, for example, less South Africans at work, uneven performance of public service causing the ailing public health system facing a burden with massive disease, poorly located and fewer infrastructures. Mostly, South Africa still lives in a divided society.