In order to become more aware of the competitive nature of the retail environment, our group conducted a competitive analysis over three different retail stores. In order to see a difference between stores, we knew we would analyze one discount/mass store, one department store, and one specialty store. From there, we chose one classification of products to analyze: women’s cropped workout leggings. We then graded this classification of products on multiple topics including: presentation of product, service, depth of assortment, location of store, shopability of classification, promotion/marketing of product, price of products and product pricing, return policy, and website. For grading purposes, we assigned each topic a score from one to five,
When examining competitive advantage, it is also important to consider the market and take into account the existing competition against larger firms.
An industry’s key success factors (KSFs) are those competitive factors that most affect industry member’s ability to survive and prosper in the market place. In this industry, the first KSF is consumers are willing to pay premium for quality of products and services. Indeed, my analysis shows that over past 30 months, growing numbers of female shoppers were patronizing the company’s stores to pay premium prices for lululemon-branded items that offered performance, fit, and comfort and were stylish as well. In fact, people were flocking to lululemon stores not only because of the
The retail industry is a highly competitive and mature. For this reason, above-average returns can only be obtained by competitive actions and responses against competitors. Porter five forces model will be used to analysis the development and competition situation in retail industry.
The industry we have chosen is the department store-retail industry. Within this industry, we have chosen the department stores of JCPenney and Macy’s. We find this industry, as well as these two companies, interesting from a strategic perspective. JCPenney has recently undergone a massive strategic restructuring in regards to its pricing, brand offerings, and store layout, pushing it away from the typical department store strategy of discounts and coupons. Its new strategy has become much closer to Wal-Mart’s strategy of every day low prices. Macy’s, on the other hand, has restructured with a push from the economic
This report presents data describing the differences amongst the two department stores, their fundamental visions, and comparative statistics. Macy’s or Dillard’s: Differences amongst these competitors There are several aspects you can analyze from each department store. Major pieces do set each one apart from the other. Brand names carried by Macy’s and Dillard’s from an average shoppers point of view can go completely unnoticed unless price is involved. For trend shoppers brand names can either make or break a retail store. It can easily determine if he or she will walk to Macy’s or Dillard’s because they already know the store does or does not carry that brand. This is consistent with each department throughout both stores and
The companies that were chosen for a company analysis include Macy’s, Kohl’s, and Burlington. Since the retail industry has been lagging behind lately, these companies will help determine the prospective financial investment in the retail industry. As Macy’s as our primary company, we chose Kohl’s and Burlington to be the two comparative companies. These companies are comparable due to the same SIC code of 5311 in the subgroup of department stores. These companies offer similar products and services with little differentiation between the three.
Comparative shopping is done in the industry constantly. But the point of the task is to identify strengths and weaknesses of your store’s merchandise mix in comparison to the competitors’. Are you offering the customer something unique in one segment of your business, but not in others? Are you just a poor second in comparison to a strong competitor? Are you under- or over-developed in certain classifications? Are your prices in line with the rest of your store? In relation to your
The Five Forces Model as defined by Dr. Michael Porter of Harvard University uses five different strategic factors to explain Competitive Rivalry a company or industry faces. The fiver forces that comprise the model are Bargaining Power of Suppliers, Bargaining Power of Buyers, Threat of Substitute Products, Potential Entrants and Completive Rivalry (Porter, 2008). The intent of this analysis is to rank-order each of these five factors from the standpoint of their influence on Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT) and their competitive position in the retailing industry. Each of the five forces are rank-ordered in terms of their importance to Target.
Style, quality and price are some of the most significant competitive factors in the industry. Merchandise mix, brands, service, loyalty programs, credit availability, and customer experience and convenience are also key competitive factors. Primary competitors are traditional department stores, upscale mass merchandisers, off-price retailers, specialty stores, internet and catalog businesses and retail commerce. Specific competitors vary from market to market by include the following: Target, Nordstrom, The Gap, Walmart, Macy’s Inc., J.C. Penny, L Brands, Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., the TJX Companies Inc., and Bed Bath and Beyond Inc.
The financial data will support the strategy as the ratios and numbers show that Macy’s has resources and capital available for the implementation. Evaluation of external and internal factors positively presenting an opportunity for Macy’s to use designed strategy to and keep competitiveness in the industry. Summarizing Macy’s is a well-established organization with over 150 successful years in business that still has an ability to compete with leaders in the industry if the right
In this paper I will discuss Macy’s Incorporated by analyzing their business level strategies to determine which I think is the most important to their long term success and if I think it is a good choice. I will analyze their corporate level strategies to determine which I think is the most important and whether or not I believe it is a good choice. I will analyze the competitive environment to determine the corporations’ most significant competitor and compare the two companies’ strategies at each level and evaluate which company I think is most likely to succeed in the long term. Once the
This is a useful tool developed by Michael Porter that allows analysing the competitive environment of a brand, company or product as well as gives feedback about the level of profitability of that industry. Porter’s forces are divided into five different variables that should be
The recognized giants in today’s discount retail market are Wal-Mart, Sears, Roebuck and Company, and Target, and this paper compares Wal-Mart and Target. As the competition stiffens to capture market niches, these two organizations are heading for a showdown. This work demonstrates distinctive differences in company culture, promotion within the organization, lofty goal setting, and leadership styles between these two organizations. Although this paper shows a definite competitive advantage for the Wal-Mart organization, it will also demonstrate that Target
Porter’s five model is defined as the framework that evaluate the position of a company in the external environment with focus drawn on the level of competitiveness (Roy 2011). The framework considers factors such as rivalry, substitute goods, the power of suppliers and buyers as well as new entrants. Four forces can influence the success of Michael Kors. The first one is competitive rivalry. Here, the struggle is about maintaining performance despite different tactics used by different companies to increase sales. For instance, Ralph Lauren uses premium prices for quality products to differentiate itself, while Coach uses product variety within the line of handbags to remain competitive (Stewart 2016). Also, when the industry is flooded with similar companies producing similar merchandise, the probability of a company stagnating is high because consumers have a variety to pick from. Hence, the need to establish loyal customers.
Competition has became evident and essential in the market of the world’s most important companies. It has allowed consumers to receive ultimate value from the goods and services that they are seeking. In my case study this competition is between two companies that produce ponchos for the fashion industry. The company that we are introduced with is named Tela and their running mate, Saira, is the Goliath of this market. Tela is trying to stay afloat and gain more customers as the underdog. Their plan to reach out to prospective customers is to introduce their new marketing strategy. This strategy includes Tela’s new mission statement which would make consumers aware of their core values and advantages over the Saira. Tela is owned by