Finally, some other possible causes will be discussed in this section. First of all, Hoshi and Kashyap (2011) demonstrate that there are three primary causes of the long recession in 1990s. One of them is “Zombie lending and depressed restructuring”. The lax misleading supervisions of the banking system were extremely serious, but the Japanese government not takes any measure to stop lending money to zombie firms. Zombie firms are defined as firms are low on production and profit should exit the market but still continue the business by government’s support. They kept recruit labor supposed be work in regular firms lead to decreasing of production. When the assets price falls, most banks losses numerous loans and they could try to find new customers, but banks followed the policy by government and continued to support existing firms. Zombie firms are grown in number in 1990s after the “bubble economy”. The most important assumption is that zombie firms obstructed the growth of regular firms. If zombie firms did not rose, there would be more productive firms, more investment and employment. The second part is “Government Regulatory Restrictions”. One example is reported that Long-Term Credit Bank LTCB had lending policies with government that one of the conditions is LTCB must keep supporting small borrowers. Bank owners were forced to continue leading. Take 1970-2002 as research sample, it can be proved that severer regulated industries lower productively
1. In the United States, the government has played an important role in production in several sectors, although its role is far more limited than in most other countries. Market failures provide an explanation for government intervention, but not an explanation for government production.
The banking crisis of the late 2000s, often called the Great Recession, is labelled by many economists as the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Its effect on the markets around the world can still be felt. Many countries suffered a drop in GDP, small or even negative growth, bankrupting businesses and rise in unemployment. The welfare cost that society had to paid lead to an obvious question: ‘Who’s to blame?’ The fingers are pointed to the United States of America, as it is obvious that this is where the crisis began, but who exactly is responsible? Many people believe that the banks are the only ones that are guilty, but this is just not true. The crisis was really a systematic failure, in which many problems in the
One of the primary factors that can be attributed as to have led the recent financial crisis is the financial deregulation allowing financial institutions a lot of freedom in the way they operated. The manifestation of this was seen in the form of:
In the 1900s, Japan faced a lot of economic obstacles. Due to its location on four moving tectonic plates, Japan experiences earthquakes more often than most other countries, Banks, at the time, struggled to keep economic activity stable after earthquakes and even attempted to regulate the flow by granting companies the ability to sell their products without having a drastic change in price. Following the discussion of earthquake bills and such, news was brought to the attention of the Japanese government that a bank in Tokyo had finally gone bankrupt. This sent many into a frenzy trying to get a hold of their money from banks, and in turn, many banks closed. However, this Japanese bank was indeed, not bankrupt, it was only struggling,
As for economic downturn, the lack of regulation and the failures of banks were both caused by the Gulf Wars. The United States government was too focused upon military conflict outside of its borders to pay attention to the loopholes that banks were using to make unwise lending decisions.
Today in Japan, a reinvention is necessary. There are many struggles with the young generation, the old generation, and catastrophic events which should be addressed. Specifically, the Japanese economy has been experiencing deflation for the past twenty years. In an article, the results of the deflation were described. The authors said, “Because of fewer available jobs and lower
Recession cycles are thought to be a normal part of living in a world of inexact balances between supply and demand. What turns a usually mild and short recession or "ordinary" business cycle into an actual depression is a subject of debate and concern. Scholars have not agreed on the exact causes and their relative importance. The search for causes is closely connected to the question of how to avoid a future depression, and so the political and policy viewpoints of scholars are mixed into the analysis of historic events eight decades ago. The even larger question is whether it was largely a failure on the part of free markets or largely a failure on the part of government efforts to regulate interest rates, curtail widespread bank failures, and control the money supply. Those who believe in a large role for the state in the economy believe it was mostly a failure of the free markets and those who believe in free markets believe it was mostly a failure of government that compounded the problem.
Government involvement in a market economy is necessary only when the industry is systemically important to the overall functioning of the economy. In many instances, little government involvement is beneficial to the market economy as it allows competitive forces to dictate operating results. For one, government involvement occasionally undermines the competitive climate of industry. Capitalism is predicated on innovation and profit motives to drive business results. With government intervention, this incentive is dramatically abated as firms are reluctant to innovate. However, in the case of systemically important institutions, government oversight is indeed needed. The most recent example occurred with the financial crisis of 2008. In this particular instance, government intervention was needed to insure the stability and confidence within the market economy. As confidence in the market declines, so too does the prevalence of capital. Overly pessimistic views of a market economy can cripple much need liquidity in the system. As a result, government involvement is needed to instill confidence within the overall system. In regards to the banking industry example, capital requirements have been implemented by government to insure the safety and viability of the market economy as a whole.
The U.S. subprime mortgage crisis was a set of events that led to the 2008 financial crisis, characterized by a rise in subprime mortgage defaults and foreclosures. This paper seeks to explain the causes of the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis and how this has led to a generalized credit crisis in other financial sectors that ultimately affects the real economy. In recent decades, financial industry has developed quickly and various financial innovation techniques have been abused widely, which is the main cause of this international financial crisis. In addition, deregulation, loose monetary policies of the Federal Reserve, shadow banking system also play
Deregulation is believed to be one of the major factors that led to the 2008 Financial Crisis. Deregulation refers to the reduction of governmental influence in an industry in order to create more competition (“Deregulation”, 2015). The reduction in government influence creates a more competitive market that
In 1945, Japan was devastated and lost a quarter of the national wealth after suffering a defect in the second world war. A majority of the commercial buildings and accommodation had been demolished, and massive machinery and equipment formerly used in production for the civil market were out of service to provide metal for military supplies (Miyazaki 1967). Despite the trash and ruins had left over in Japan, Japan was able to rebuilding its infrastructure and reconstruct their economy. It is revealed that the Japanese economy was on its way to recovery, which received a rapid development since the war, and the reconstruction of Japan had spent less than forty years to become the world’s second largest economy in the 1980s. This essay will explore the three factors account for the economic growth of post-war Japan: the financial assistance from the United States, the external environment, and the effective policy of Japanese government.
There are various government structures in organizations although they are different from one branch of the government to the other. The structures help the government manage its economy efficiently. In the economy a too big to fail firm (TBTF) exists and it is defined as one that its complexity, size, critical functions, and interconnections are in the sense that in case the firm goes into liquidation unexpectedly, the rest of the economy and financial system will face severe consequences. The government provides support to TBTF companies not because they favor them but because they recognize implications for an advanced economy of allowing a disorderly failure outweighs the cost of avoiding the failure. Helping the TBTF firms enable the economy to realize high revenue. Various activities are to prevent their failure. They include providing credit, facilitating a merger, or injecting the capital of the government. The paper addresses the structures of the administration and the concept of too big to fail in financial and non-financial institutions plus the ethics involved with the theory.
The onset of Super Endaka in 1995 summed up to an already existing situation of global recession (1991), with price pressures, posted production and sales declines. Moreover, trade barriers in Europe prevented Japan's firms to expand and compensate for the US losses, where the price effects of yen appreciation were most severe. This time, the challenge posed by the new exchange rate shift was even harder than the first one.
In addition to the causes above, the following events have further deepened Japan’s economic situation during the Lost Decades:
Sectoral Slumps. A slump in the sectors where financial institutions’ loans and investments are concentrated could have an immediate impact on financial system soundness. It deteriorates the quality of financial institutions’ portfolios and profitability margins, and lowers their cash flow and reserves. In transition economies, these problems may also arise due to lack of progress in the restructuring of state-owned enterprises.