CCN2231 – GENERAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Lecturer: Dr. IVAN CHUNG
GROUP PROJECT
LAB REPORT 1
Group B
Student Name: Yip Ho Yin (Student ID:12309985A)
Student Name: Wong Kin Hin (Student ID:12310084A)
Student Name: Ling Tung Yin (Student ID:12307848A)
Student Name: Cheuk Hiu Fung (Student ID:12309957A)
Student Name: Wong Hoi Tung (Student ID:12309501A)
Date of submission:
Date of Experiment: Introduction
Glucose-6-phosphase (G6Pase) is an enzyme presented in liver and used in the hydrolysis of glucose-6-phosphate (G6P). This catalyst the final step in glycogeneogeneis and glycogenolysis which is the key point of homeostatic regulating the blood
…show more content…
During the experiment, the samples are placed in the water bath. The water tank has a large volume and it is an open system. The temperature of the water inside is difficult to keep constant. That makes the reaction in the sample cannot perform well at a suitable temperature, which is the body temperature. As there is a difference in the temperature, the reaction completeness in each sample may not be the same. The products formed may not be completed. That means there are some reactants were at complex form. This affects the result of the experiment. We cannot have an accurate measure of each sample. Thus, the accuracy of the experiment is not good enough.
Another reason that causes an error is the sedimentation of the homogenized liver tissue. After grounding and homogenizing the liver tissue, it was put into a container and wait for the next step of the experiment. However, during this period of time, the sedimentation of the sample occurred. The G6Pase that we needed may lie down. Only the surface of the homogenized liver tissue is extracted and therefore the amount and purity of the enzyme is not accurate.
The last reason that leads to an error is that the experiment last
One of our flaws was that the temperature of the water was not exactly the same when we did the different trials. The temperatures were slightly off from our recorded value during the experiments. The change in temperature would affect the time it took for the Alka-Seltzer tablet to dissolve in the water. If there was a direct relationship between water temperature and dissolve time, we would not be able to see it because the temperatures are off and the dissolve times are not associated with the correct temperature. Another flaw is that we did not use the same amount of water throughout the experiment. We used a beaker to measure the water, which did not result in accurate measurements. The difference in amount of water could result in a difference in reaction time. The third flaw in the experiment was that during the reaction of the warm water, the water in the cup overflowed and spilled, bringing some of the Alka-Seltzer tablet with it. There were different amounts of tablet in different areas of the water, which means a different amount of Alka-Seltzer remained inside of the cup in each trial. This difference would mean that data for the warm water would fluctuate and we would not have accurate
The dependent variable in the experiment was the temperature and energy absorbed by the water.
The difference was in how long it took for the bubbles to come to the surface and the solution to become clear. Also, when doing the lab, once the correct temperature for the water was reached, the experimenter pulled the beakers out one by one completing all 5 trials. This may have caused slight fluctuations in data because by the time the 4 trials were finished, the temperature of the beaker may have increased by a few degrees. As for the act of measuring, there was a slight error because the experimenters did not take the beakers off the hot plate at exactly 30.00 degrees, or whatever the temperature may be. In order to provide more accurate results, the experimenter could do all
What other conditions that may affect the action of enzymes? Substrates could affect the action of the
To make the results of the experiment valid four variables to take into account are if the freezer is the same temperature for both tests, the water is the same water just different temperatures, the ice cube trays are the same size, and finally both trays are in the freezer for the same amount of time.
Controls- The control in this experiment was very important because if it was not contained, then the data would have been faulty. It was very difficult to keep
After the substrate solution was added, five drops of the enzyme were quickly placed in tubes 3, 4 and 5. There were no drops of enzyme added in tubes 1 and 2 and in tube 6 ten drops were added. Once the enzyme solution has been added the tubes were then left to incubate for ten minutes and after five drops of DNSA solution were added to tubes 1 to 6. The tubes were then placed in a hot block at 80-90oC for five minutes. They were then taken out after the five minute period and using a 5 ml pipette, 5 ml of distilled water were added to the 6 tubes and mixed by inversion. Once everything was complete the 6 tubes were then taken to the Milton Roy Company Spectronic 21 and the absorbance of each tube was tested.
In the lab the total volume of solutions used is kept constant in all the trials so that the temperature change remains directly proportional to the amount of reaction that occurs as well to the extent of the reaction.
The experiment is repeated twice and an average is obtained. This ensures the consistency of the measurement as the reading is triplicated, thus reducing anomalies. It can be seen that the reading obtained were around the same value. This proves that the results are reliable.
This lab is performed in order to determine the total energy in a reaction between zinc and hydrochloric acid. The reaction is done twice, once to measure the heat of the reaction and again to determine the work done in the system. This is because Enthalpy equals heat plus work (∆H= ∆E+W). Heat and work can be broken down further into separate components so the equation used in lab is ∆H=mc∆T + PV. Many calculations are used in the lab to find out what cannot be measured directly (ex: volume). After all the calculations were complete it was shown to have a very small percent error.
One possible source of error that can affect the results was that a mercury thermometer was used instead of an electronic one. The use of a mercury
To find the effect of temperature on the activity of an enzyme, the experiment deals with the steps as follows. First, 3 mL if pH 7 phosphate buffer was used to fill three different test tubes that were labeled 10, 24, and 50. These three test tubes were set in three different temperature settings. The first test tube was placed in an ice-water bath for ten minutes until it reached a temperature of 2° C or less. The second tube’s temperature setting was at room temperature until a temperature of 21°C was reached. The third tube was placed in a beaker of warm-water until the contents of the beaker reached a temperature setting of 60° C. There were four more test tubes that were included in the procedure. Two of the test tubes contained potato juice were one was put in ice and the other was placed in warm-water. The other two test tubes contained catechol. One test tube was put in ice and the other in warm water. After
The substrates of glycerate kinase are ATP and D-glycerate and the products are ADP and 3-phospho-D-glycerate. This enzyme belongs to the family of transferases.1 Other common names include: glycerate kinase (phosphorylating), D-glycerate 3-kinase, D-glycerate kinase, glycerate-3-kinase, GK, D-glyceric acid kinase, and ATP: D-glycerate 2-phosphotransferase. 1 This enzyme participates in 3 metabolic pathways: serine/glycine/threonine metabolism, glycerolipid metabolism, and glyoxylate-dicarboxylate metabolism.1
There were three test tubes in which the experiment was held. A relatively equal sized portion of raw potato (this contained the enzyme [a biological catalyst] hydrogen peroxidase) was placed in each tube. Then, enough water to cover the potato was added. Proceeding this, each of the test tubes were assigned a temperature; cold, room temperature or warm (this was written on the tag so that they were not confused). The test tube destinated ‘cold’ was placed in a ice bath for five minutes. At the same time, the ‘hot’ test tube was placed in a hot water bath for five minutes. Meanwhile, the room temperature test tube sat at room temperature for five minutes. When the five minutes were over, the test tubes were returned to the rack (so that they were able to be observed). Then, the test tubes were allowed to sit at room temperature for five more minutes. Once that period of time was over, 2 ml of hydrogen peroxide (the substrate) was added to each tube.
The water was taken from the same source and the same thermometer was used, yet different values were derived each time. This is a type of environmental factor, which is a random error as it affected the values differently.