2. Consider the labor leisure decision with utility of In(c)+ aln(1). This utility function is characterized by an elasticity of substitution equal to one. a. What observation leads us to use this utility function? In answering this question, be sure to both list this observation and explain how it relates to the unit elasticity of substitution property. b. Explain why this utility function leads to the following claim: "To predict the effect of a change in the tax rate on work hours, one needs to know how the tax revenues are spent." In your explanation, you must demonstrate with the indifference curve/budget constraint diagram(s) two cases: one where the use of the tax revenues has no effect on the equilibrium work hours and another use of tax revenues where it does affect equilibrium work hours.

2. Consider the labor leisure decision with utility of In(c)+ aln(1). This utility function is characterized by an elasticity of substitution equal to one. a. What observation leads us to use this utility function? In answering this question, be sure to both list this observation and explain how it relates to the unit elasticity of substitution property. b. Explain why this utility function leads to the following claim: "To predict the effect of a change in the tax rate on work hours, one needs to know how the tax revenues are spent." In your explanation, you must demonstrate with the indifference curve/budget constraint diagram(s) two cases: one where the use of the tax revenues has no effect on the equilibrium work hours and another use of tax revenues where it does affect equilibrium work hours.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter16: Labor Markets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16.11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Assume the following production function (photo aswell) q = [0.3k^(-1)+ 0.7l ^(-1)] ^(-1) a) Determine the rate of technical substitution, RTS. b) Determine the elasticity of substitution. c) What would happen to the capital intensity if the relative factor price w/v were to increase by 10%? d) If the elasticity of substitution were higher than what you calculated in (b), would the effect of a 10% increase in the relative factor price w/v on the capital intensity be higher or lower than what you calculated in (c)? Explain your reasoning.
Consider a firm for which production depends on two normal inputs, labor and capital, with prices w and r, respectively. Initially the firm faces market prices of w = 6 and r = 4. These prices then shift to w = 4 and r = 2.a. In which direction will the substitution effect change the firm’s employment and capital s tock?b. In which direction will the scale effect change the firm’s employment and capital stock?c. Can we say conclusively whether the firm will use more or less labor? More or less c apital?
69. If the price of labor falls relative to the price of capital, and as a result the quantity of capital employed decreases, it can be concluded that: A. The substitution effect is greater than the output effectB. The output effect is greater than the substitution effectC. The income effect is greater than the output effectD. Labor cannot be easily substituted for capital
in your own Words How do the concepts of income and substitution effects enhance our understanding why annual hours worked have tended to fall over time"
What is the marginal rate of substitution at point A? Interpret this value.
What is the marginal rate of substitution of x for y when x = 16 and y = 54?
Constrained Optimization: Cobb-Douglas Production Function:1. Based from the factor shares of the two inputs, what will happen to the number of output if it the firm decides to triple both the amount of labor and capital?2. State the optimization problem of the firm.3. Solve for the formulas of the Marginal Product of Labor (MPL), and Marginal product ofCapital (MPK)4. Using your knowledge of the tangency condition in Producer’s theory, find the combinationof K and L that the firm should use to produce the maximum possible output. Do not solvethe problem using the Lagrangian method.Note: The tangency conditions just states that the slope of the production function must beequal to the slope of the isocost function.5. What is the maximum possible output that the firm could earn given the constraint it faces?
Katie’s preferences for consumption and leisure can be expressed as U(C, L) = (C – 80) x (L – 40) This utility function implies that Katie’s marginal utility of leisure is C – 80 and her marginal utility of consumption is L – 40. There are 110 hours in the week available to split between work and leisure. Katie earns $15 per hour after taxes. She also receives $200 worth of assistance benefits each week regardless of how much she works. Graph Katie’s budget line. What is Katie’s marginal rate of substitution when L = 70 and she is on her budget line? What is Katie’s reservation wage? Find Katie’s optimal amount of consumption and leisure.
4. Akua gains utility from consumption C and leisure L. The most leisure she can consume in any given week is 110 hours. Her utility function is U (C, L) = C × L. Akua receives 660 GHS each week from her great-grandmother—regardless of how much she works. a. What will be Akua’s marginal rate of substitution. b. What will be Akua’s reservation wage? (Explain in detail)
Define marginal rate of substitution.
Briefly explain and graphically illustrate the property of diminishing margincal rate of substitution and its relation to marginal utilities.
Suppose that the owner of Boyer Construction is feeling the pinch of incrs associated with worker’s compensation and has decided to cut the wages of its two employees (Albert and Sid) from $25 per hour to $22 per hour. Assume that Albert and Sid view income and leisure as “goods,” that both experience a diminishing rate of marginal substitution between income and leisure, and that the workers have the same before- and after-tax budget constraints at each wage. Draw each worker’s opportunity set for each hourly wage. At the wage of $25 per hour, both Albert and Sid are observed to consume 12 hours of leisure (and, equivalently, supply 12 hours of labor). After wages were cut to $22, Albert consumes 10 hours of leisure and Sid consumes 14 hours of leisure. Determine the number of hours of labor each worker supplies at a wage of $22 per hour. How can you explain the seemingly contradictory result that the workers supply a different number of labor hours? (LO2, LO3, LO7)