4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Blahnik and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2019 and 2069. Year 2019 2069 Year 2019 2069 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 11 16 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 8 13 Blahnik Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Output (Gobs of goo) 1,800 2,160 Gribinez Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Productivity (Gobs per worker) Output Productivity (Gobs of goo) (Gobs per worker). 900 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Blahnik than in Gribinez. From 2019 to 2069, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Blahnik to rise by a the effect.

4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Blahnik and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2019 and 2069. Year 2019 2069 Year 2019 2069 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 11 16 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 8 13 Blahnik Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Output (Gobs of goo) 1,800 2,160 Gribinez Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Productivity (Gobs per worker) Output Productivity (Gobs of goo) (Gobs per worker). 900 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Blahnik than in Gribinez. From 2019 to 2069, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Blahnik to rise by a the effect.

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter20: Economic Growth In The Global Economy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Say that the average worker in the U.S. economy is eight times as productive as an average worker in Mexico. If the productivity of U.S. workers grows at 2 for 25 years and the productivity of Mexicos workers grows at 6 for 25 years, which country will have higher worker productivity at that point?
Refer back to the Work It Out about Comparing the Economies of Two Countries and examine the data for the two countries you chose. How are they similar? How are they different?
An economy starts off with a GDP per capita of 5,000. How large will the GDP per capita be if it grows at an annual rate of 2 for 20 years? 2 for 40 years? 4 for 40 years? 6 for 40 years?
Are there other ways in which we can measure productivity besides the amount produced per hour of work?
Why dues productivity growth in high-income economies not slow down as it runs into diminishing returns from additional investments in physical capital and human capital? Does this show one area where the theory of diminishing returns fails to apply? Why or why not?
How did the Industrial Revolution increase the economic growth rate and income levels in the United States?
What do the growth accounting studies conclude are the determinants of growth? Which is more important, the determinants or how they am combined?
Consider the economies of Sporon and Gobbledigook, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 20 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2015 and 2035. Sporon Year Physical Capital (Tools per worker) Labor Force (Workers) Output (Gobs of goo) Productivity (Gobs per worker) 2015 11 30 1,800 2035 16 30 2,160 Gobbledigook Year Physical Capital (Tools per worker) Labor Force (Workers) Output (Gobs of goo) Productivity (Gobs per worker) 2015 8 30 900 2035 13 30 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Sporon than in Gobbledigook. From 2015 to 2035, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker…
1. Country A and B both have the production functionY = F (K, L) = K ½L ½or Y = K0.5 L0.5 a) What is the per-worker production function, y= f (k)? Please make sure to write specificfunctional form of the per-worker production function. b) Assume that neither country experiences population growth nor technological progressand that 4 percent of capital depreciates each year. Assume further that country A saves 24percent of output each year and country B saves 16 percent of output each year. Using youranswer from part a) and the steady-state condition, find the steady-state level of capital perworker for each country. Then find the steady-state levels of income per worker for eachcountry and steady-state level of consumption per worker for each country.
Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce gaggles of gop using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 10 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2016 and 2026. **THE TABLE IS ATTACHED** Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Hermes than in Gribinez. From 2016 to 2026, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Hermes to rise by a _________ (LARGER/SMALLER) amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates the _______ (CATCH-UP/NATURAL RESOURCES/TECHNOLOGY/HUMAN CAPITAL) effect. THANK YOU FOR THE HELP
Computing growth rates (II): Suppose k, l, and m grow at constant rates givenby g k, gl , and gm. What is the growth rate of y in each of the following cases?(a) y = k 1/3(b) y = k 1/3l 2/3(c) y = mk 1/3l 2/3(d) y = mk 1/4l 3/4(e) y = mk 3/4l 1/4(f ) y = 1klm2 1/2(g) y = 1kl2 1/4 11/m2 3/4
Suppose that total capital and labour both increase by the Suppose that total capital and labour both increase by the same percentage amount so that the amount of capital per worker k does not change. Writing the production function in per-worker terms, y = f(k), requires that this increase in capital and labour must not change the amount of output produced per worker y. Use the growth accounting equation to show that equal percentage increases in capital and labour will leave output per worker unaffected only if aK + aN = 1. Suppose that total capital and labour both increase by the