4/6 2/ u(21,72) = z"z" where 1 Is the quantity of good 1 that he consumes and Is the quantity of good 2 that he consumes, Circe has the utility function 1/2.1/2 where yi is the quantity of good 1 that she consumes and 2 is the quantity of good 2 that she consumes. Both Odysseus and Circe are endowed with 16 units of good 1 and 16 units of good 2. If Odysseus can make Circe a take-it-or-leave-it offer, what would Circe's utility after the exchange? Note: if Circe rejects Odysseus' offer, no exchange would take place.

4/6 2/ u(21,72) = z"z" where 1 Is the quantity of good 1 that he consumes and Is the quantity of good 2 that he consumes, Circe has the utility function 1/2.1/2 where yi is the quantity of good 1 that she consumes and 2 is the quantity of good 2 that she consumes. Both Odysseus and Circe are endowed with 16 units of good 1 and 16 units of good 2. If Odysseus can make Circe a take-it-or-leave-it offer, what would Circe's utility after the exchange? Note: if Circe rejects Odysseus' offer, no exchange would take place.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter4: Utility Maximization And Choice

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4.11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Megan is a college student who consumes food and transportation. Last year, she consumed 90 meals and purchased 100 gallons of gasoline per month. Suppose that last year the price of a meal was $5 and the price of a gallon of gasoline was $2.23. However, this year, the price of a meal is $6 and the price of a gallon of gasoline is $3.92. As a result, Megan consumes 100 meals and 80 gallons of gasoline. For this example, assume Megan's utility this year is the same as her utility last year (and that her preferences have not changed). Calculate a Laspeyres cost-of-living index for Megan using 100 as the base for last year. In particular, the Laspeyres index for this year is nothing. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
Consider an economy composed of 16 consumers. Of these, 5 consumers each own one right shoe and 11 consumers each own one left shoe. Shoes are indivisible. Everyone has the same utility function, which is Min(2R, L}, where R and L are, respectively, the quantities of right and left shoes con sumed. A) (10%) Is the status quo (where each individual has his own shoe) Pareto efficient? If so, briefly explain why. If not, provide a Pareto improvement b) (10%) Characterize all Pareto efficient allocations
An individual is faced with a choice of buying housing in one of two markets; the private market where he may buy any amount of housing he pleases at the going price, and the public housing market where he will be offered, on a take-it-or-leave-it-basis, a particular amount of housing at a price lower than that which he would pay for it on the private market. Will he necessarily choose the public housing? If so, may we conclude that he will consume more housing than he would have purchased had he been forced to buy it on the private market? (With thanks to Dr Leslie Rosenthal.)
Rohan’s current marginal utility from consuming peanuts is 100 utils per ounce and his marginal utility from consuming cashews is 200 utils per ounce. If peanuts cost $0.10 per ounce and cashews cost $0.50 per ounce, is Rohan maximizing his total utility from the kinds of nuts? Enter your responses as whole numbers. At the current level of peanut consumption, Rohan receives: utils per dollar.At the current level of cashew consumption, Rohan receives: utils per dollar.Therefore, Rohan maximizing his total utility because MUp/Pp is MUc/Pc.
Suppose that each week Fiona buys 16 peaches and 4 apples at her local farmer's market. Both kinds of fruit cost $1 each. From this we can infer that: If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be greater than her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. Fiona is not maximizing her utility. If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be equal to her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. The law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold for Fiona.
A consumer finds only three products, X, Y, and Z, are for sale. The amount of utility which their consumption will yield is shown in the table below. Assume that the prices of X, Y, and Z are $10, $2, and $8, respectively, and that the consumer has an income of $74 to spend. Product X Product Y Product Z Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ 1 42 NA 1 14 NA 1 32 NA 2 82 4 2 26 6 2 60 3.5 3 118 3.6 3 36 5 3 84 3 4 148 3 4 44 4 4 100 2 5 170 2.2 5 50 3 5 110 1.25 6 182 1.2 6 54 2 6 116 0.75 7 182 _0 7 56.4 _1.2 7 120 _0.5_ Why would the consumer not be maximizing utility by purchasing 2 units of X, 4 units of Y, and 1 unit of Z?
A consumer finds only three products, X, Y, and Z, are for sale. The amount of utility which their consumption will yield is shown in the table below. Assume that the prices of X, Y, and Z are $10, $2, and $8, respectively, and that the consumer has an income of $74 to spend. Product X Product Y Product Z Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ 1 42 NA 1 14 NA 1 32 ___NA__ 2 82 4 2 26 6 2 60 __3.5_ 3 118 3.6 3 36 5 3 84 __3___ 4 148 3 4 44 4 4 100 __2___ 5 170 2.2 5 50 3 5 110 _1.25___ 6 182 1.2 6 54 2 6 116 _0.75__ 7 182 0 7 56.4 1.2 7 120 _0.5_ How many units of X, Y, and Z will the consumer buy when maximizing utility and spending all…
A common marketing tactic among many liquor stores is to offer clientele quantity (or volume) discounts. For instance, the second-leading brand of wine exported from Chile sells in the United States for $15 per bottle if the consumer purchases up to eight bottles. The price of each additional bottle is only $8. If a consumer has $200 to divide between purchasing this brand of wine and other goods, graphically illustrate how this marketing tactic affects the consumer's budget set if the price of other goods is $1. Assuming a consumer has standard indifference curves (i.e.,resembling those in Figure 4-2), will she ever purchase exactly 8 bottles of wine?
Mylie’s total utility from singing the same song over and over is 50 utils after one repetition, 90 utils after two repetitions, 70 utils after three repetitions, 20 utils after four repetitions, −50 utils after five repetitions, and −200 utils after six repetitions. Write down her marginal utility for each repetition. Once Mylie’s total utility begins to decrease, does each additional singing of the song hurt more than the previous one or less than the previous one?
True or false with reasoning: 1) _______When we claim that utility can be ordinally measured, we assume that the consumer is able to measure the total and marginal utility received when one extra unit of a commodity is consumed. 2)_______If MRS between two goods is constant, then having more of one good without having more of the other does not increase utility. 3)_______Marginal Utility increases until total utility is at a maximum and then marginal utility decreases.
Assume that the prices of good X, Y and Z are as follows R5,R1 and R4 respectively, and the Judith has an income of R37 to spend. HOW much of each good will judith consume in order to maximise her utility? What will be her total utility and marginal utility of the last rand spent on each good? Show all the calculations
Mats, who has reference-dependent preferences over beer and money, goes to the local pub with a friend, but is not planning on drinking any beer or spending any of his 50 Euro in cash. Let his end-of-evening outcomes in pints of beer consumed and cash be c1 and c2, respectively, and let his reference point in pints of beer and cash be r1 and r2, respectively. Then, Mats’ utility is given by v(6c1 − 6r1) + v(c2 − r2), where v(x) = x for x ≥ 0, and v(x) = 1.5x for x < 0. (a) Suppose that the price of beer is pB. Calculate Mats’ utility from drinking one pint of beer at this price. What is Mats’ utility from drinking no beer? And, comparing these two utility values, what is the maximum price pB that Mats would pay for one beer? (b) Suppose that Mats unexpectedly gets a pint of beer as part of a promotion at the pub, and incorporates its consumption into his reference point in beer. [Hint: this means that (r1, r2) = (1, 50).] Suppose that Mats could sell the beer at a price pS.…