In order to encourage energy conservation, many public utility companies charge consumers a higher rate on units of electricity consumed in excess of some threshold amount. In contrast, a common practice by other firms is to offer “quantity discounts” to consumers who purchase large quantities of a good. Suppose income is $100, PX = $2 if the consumer buys less than 40 units of X, and PY = $5. A. For the energy case, assume PX = $3 if the consumer buys more than 40 units of X B. For the “quantity discounts” case, assume PX = $1 after 40 units of X were consumed Draw the budget constraints in each of the cases above. What are the implications of the opportunity sets in terms of consumer behavior to consume each of the products?

In order to encourage energy conservation, many public utility companies charge consumers a higher rate on units of electricity consumed in excess of some threshold amount. In contrast, a common practice by other firms is to offer “quantity discounts” to consumers who purchase large quantities of a good. Suppose income is $100, PX = $2 if the consumer buys less than 40 units of X, and PY = $5. A. For the energy case, assume PX = $3 if the consumer buys more than 40 units of X B. For the “quantity discounts” case, assume PX = $1 after 40 units of X were consumed Draw the budget constraints in each of the cases above. What are the implications of the opportunity sets in terms of consumer behavior to consume each of the products?

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter4: Utility Maximization And Choice

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4.14P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose the utility function for Njeru is given by U = f(X1, X2) = X10.25 X20.75. Given that the price of commodity X1 is Kshs. 10 per unit and that of community X2 is Kshs. 15 per unit. Using Lagrangian multiplier technique determine units of the two commodities Njeru will buy given an income of Kshs. 40,000 in order to maximize his utility.
Consider a person who consumes water and bread, deriving utility by xy if x is the amount of water consumed and y is the amount of bread consumed. Suppose this person's income is Rs. 10, the unit price of bread is Rs. 3 and the unit price of water facing this person is Re. 1. The price of water incorporates a per unit subsidy of Re. 1, i.e., for every unit of water consumed by this person, she pays Re. 1 to the water supplier and the government pays Re. 1 to the water supplier. Suppose this person's demand is (x0, y0). ,If the government provides this person a lump-sum income subsidy that exactly offsets her utility loss on account of removal of the water subsidy, then the required lump-sum subsidy is
The government wants to make medicare benefits available to more people, but to achieve this goal, it needs to make cuts in the existing medicare budget. The two areas where they are considering cuts are non-essential elective surgery and 6-12 month mental health care programs. Applying the concept of diminishing marginal utility, the budget cuts should be made for spending on: a. neither can be compared by measuring marginal utility. b. mental health therapy due to its higher marginal return rate. c. elective surgery due to its lower marginal return rate. d. both programs, which have the same marginal return rate.
If the initial distribution of two goods between two people is Pareto optimal, which of the following statements is TRUE? A. It is possible to reallocate the goods between the two people so as to increase the utility of both people. B. It is possible to reallocate the goods between the two people so as to increase the utility of one person without decreasing the utility of the other. C. It is possible to reallocate the goods between the two people so as to increase the utility of one person, but only at the expense of the other person. D. It is impossible to reallocate the goods between the two people so as to increase either person's utility. E. None of the above
Consider a two-person exchange economy in which initial endowments for both individuals are such that (e1 = e1) = (1,1). Suppose the two individuals have the following indirect utility functions: V1 (x, y) = ln M1 - a ln Px - (1-a) ln Py V2 (x, y) = ln M2 -b ln Px - (1-b) ln Py Where Mi is the income level of person i and Px and Py are the prices for goods x and goods y, respectively. a) Calculate the market clearing prices.
The U.S. government spends over $74 billion on its Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to provide millions of Americans with the means to purchase food. Beneficiaries use an Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card to transfer their government benefits from a federal account to a retailer account. The funds on an EBT card cannot be sold for cash or used to purchase nonfood items. The average SNAP benefit is about $284 per month. Suppose that, in the absence of SNAP, the average consumer must divide $600 in monthly income between food and “all other goods” such that the following budget constraint holds: $600 = $12A + $4F, where A is the quantity of “all other goods” and F is the quantity of food purchased. Using the vertical axis for “all other goods,” draw the consumer’s budget line in the absence of SNAP. What is the market rate of substitution between food and “all other goods”? On the same graph, show how SNAP alters the average consumer’s budget line. Would this…
Assume an individual spends all of the their income on a bundle comprised of good #1 and good #2. In particular, their utility function is given by: U(q1,q2) = q12/3q21/3 Assume the price of good #1 is $1 (p1=1) and the price of good #2 is $3 (p2=3). What must the individual's income be if they maximize their utility by purchasing 10 units of good #1?
Because Income depends on work effort and work effort depends on nutrition, suppose the relationship between income (Y) and total food availability (F) in a poor household is given by: Y = 10F + 20F2 – 0.6F3 a) If food availability in a two-person household is 20, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain. b) If food availability in a two-person household is 30, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain.
Exercise 2. In order to encourage energy conservation, many public utility companies charge consumers a higher rate on units of electricity consumed in excess of some threshold amount. In contrast, a common practice by other firms is to offer “quantity discounts” to consumers who purchase large quantities of a good. Suppose income is $100, PX = $2 if theconsumer buys less than 40 units of X, and PY = $5.A. For the energy case, assume PX = $3 if the consumer buys more than 40 units of XB. For the “quantity discounts” case, assume PX = $1 after 40 units of X were consumed Draw the budget constraints in each of the cases above. What are the implications of the opportunity sets in terms of consumer behavior to consume each of the products?
Concerned about the welfare of people, the Government restricts consumption of good 2 to a maximum of 20 units. If a consumer has an income of $50 and faces price p1 = 1 and p2 = 2, what is the budget constraint for the consumer given the rule from Government? Group of answer choices x2 = 20 if x1 ≤ 10, x1 + 2x2 = 50 if 10 ≤ x1≤ 50 x1 + 2x2 = 50 if 0 ≤ x1≤ 50 none of the above x2 = 20 if x1 ≤ 20, x1 + 2x2 = 50 if 20 ≤ x1≤ 50 x2 = 20
Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves one year of life at a cost of $10,000. Treatment 2 saves ten years of life at a cost of $1,000,000. Which treatment is more cost-effective? Why? Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves six years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $90,000. Treatment 2 saves three years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $60,000. Which treatment is preferred from a cost utility analysis perspective? Suppose Jay has been experiencing back pain and that there are two options for back pain: Treatment Regimen Total Cost Pain Reduction Do nothing $0 0 units Cortisone injections $600 30 units Calculate the ICER between cortisone injections and doing nothing. Jay says he is willing to pay $10 for a per unit of pain reduction. Should he choose cortisone injections? Another treatment is discovered. It costs $700 and reduces pain by 25 units. Should he choose the new treatment?
An individual is faced with a choice of buying housing in one of two markets; the private market where he may buy any amount of housing he pleases at the going price, and the public housing market where he will be offered, on a take-it-or-leave-it-basis, a particular amount of housing at a price lower than that which he would pay for it on the private market. Will he necessarily choose the public housing? If so, may we conclude that he will consume more housing than he would have purchased had he been forced to buy it on the private market? (With thanks to Dr Leslie Rosenthal.)