i need help with this question 8) Consider the economy of Hicksonia.a. The consumption function is given byC=200 +0.75(Y-T)The investment function isI = 200-25iGovernment purchases and taxes are both 100. For this economy, graph the IS curvefor i ranging from 0 to 8. Is the Government running a surplus or a deficit (orneither)?b. The money dema File Preview n Hicksonia is--)d=Y-100iThe money supply M is 1,000 and the price level P is 2. For this economy, graph theLM curve for i ranging from 0 to 8.c. Find the equilibrium interest rate i and the equilibrium level of income Y.d. Suppose that the government purchases are raised from 100 to 150. How much doesthe IS curve shift? What are the new equilibrium interest rate and level of income?e. Suppose instead that the money supply is raised from 1,000 to 1,200. How much doesthe LM curve shift? What are the new equilibrium interest rate and level of income?f. With the initial values for monetary and fiscal policy, suppose that the price level risesfrom 2 to 4. What happens? What are the new equilibrium interest rate and level ofincome?

Since you have posted a question with multiple sub-parts, we will solve the first three subparts for…

8) Consider the economy of Hicksonia. a. The consumption function is given by C=200 +0.75(Y-T) The investment function is I = 200-25i Government purchases and taxes are both 100. For this economy, graph the IS curve for i ranging from 0 to 8. Is the Government running a surplus or a deficit (or neither)?

8) Consider the economy of Hicksonia. a. The consumption function is given by C=200 +0.75(Y-T) The investment function is I = 200-25i Government purchases and taxes are both 100. For this economy, graph the IS curve for i ranging from 0 to 8. Is the Government running a surplus or a deficit (or neither)?

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter24: Fiscal Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is the main advantage of automatic stabilizers over discretionary fiscal policy?
Explain whether or not you agree with the premise of the Ricardian equivalence theory that rational people might reason: Well, a higher budget deficit (surplus) means that Im just going to owe more (less) taxes In the future to pay off all that government borrowing, so Ill start saving (spending) now. Why or why not?
Under what general macroeconomic circumstances might a government use expansionary fiscal policy? When might it use contractionary fiscal policy?
Explain how automatic stabilizers work, both on the taxation side and on the spending side, first in a situation where the economy is producing less than potential GDP and then in a situation where the economy Is producing more than potential GDP.
Why is spending by the U.S. government on scientific research at NASA fiscal policy while spending by the University of Illinois is not fiscal policy? Why is a cut in the payroll tax fiscal policy whereas a cut in a state income tax is not fiscal policy?
In a recession, does the actual budget surplus or deficit fall above or below the standardized employment budget?
What would happen if expansionary fiscal policy was implemented in a recession but, due to lag, did not actually take effect until after the economy was back to potential GDP?