A court does not have the power to remove a director when: Multiple Choice petitioned by shareholders. it finds that the director engaged in fraudulent conduct. it finds that the director intentionally inflicted harm on the corporation. it believes removal would help the corporation operate more globally responsibly.

A court does not have the power to remove a director when: Multiple Choice petitioned by shareholders. it finds that the director engaged in fraudulent conduct. it finds that the director intentionally inflicted harm on the corporation. it believes removal would help the corporation operate more globally responsibly.

Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives/Acct

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337485913

Author:BROOKS

Publisher:BROOKS

Chapter2: Ethics & Governance Scandals

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which of the following statements relating to corporate governance is FALSE? The legal environment in which a corporation does business can have a big impact on its decisions. Type I agency problems are more important in widely held companies. (Tick here if you think that none of the other statements is FALSE.) Straight voting is better for minority shareholders than cumulative voting. In a civil law system, judges interpret the law but they cannot change it.
When a corporation is dissolved due to fraud, graft, and corruption, can innocent employees and stockholders have claims over the asset of the corporation after satisfying all its liabilities?
An investor or creditor believes that they have suffered harm due to the unexpected the bankruptcy of a large corporation: Required: Can that investor or creditor sue the auditor of the large corporation under contract law? Explain. If the investor or creditor chooses to sue the auditor of the large corporation under tort law, what must they prove before their claim can succeed? How can the auditor contest a claim of negligence?
The Corporation Code sanctions a contract between two or more corporations which have interlocking directors, provided there is no fraud that attends it and it is fair and reasonable under the circumstances. The interest of an interlocking director in one corporation may be either substantial or nominal. It is nominal if his interest: a. does not exceed 25% of the outstanding capital stock. b. exceeds 25% of the outstanding capital stock. c. exceeds 20% of the outstanding capital stock. d. does not exceed 20% of the outstanding capital stock.
Enron's directors realized that Enron's conflict of interests policy would be violated by Fastow's proposed SPE management and operating arrangements and they instructed the CEO, Andrew Fastow, as an alternative oversight measure, endure that he kept the company out of trouble. What was wrong with their alternatives?
After dissolution caused by the illegal acts, fraud, corruption and etc. of the directors, trustees, officers, or employees, what will happen to the innocent stockholders and employees? Are they going to receive something from the company's assets since they are not involved to that act?
Question If a company adopted a particular accounting policy that ASIC considered to be questionable, in principle ASIC might consider taking legal action against the company’s directors for failing to produce true and fair financial statements. However, from a practical perspective, why would it be difficult for ASIC to prove in court that the company’s financial statements were not true and fair?
A director’s duty to avoid a conflict of interest includes:Select one:a. Not making a personal profit from an opportunity arising from their officeb. Not taking up an opportunity that belongs to the companyc. Not using his or her position for private gaind. All of the above
The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits public accounting firms froma. Acting in a managerial decision-making role for an audit client.b. Auditing the firm’s own work on an audit client.c. Providing tax consulting to an audit client without audit committee approval.d. All of the above.
Which of the following is incorrect: Options: a) The Market for Corporate Control is an important external mechanism for encouraging corporate managers to act in their shareholders’ best interests b) GMU Dean Emeritus Henry G. Manne developed the theoretical concept of “Market for Corporate Control” c) The Market for Corporate Control was enacted into law by the Williams Act d) The Market for Corporate Control protects rationally ignorant shareholders e) None of the above
Agency conflicts between managers and shareholders Remember, an agency relationship can degenerate into an agency conflict when an agent acts in a manner that is not in the best interest of his or her principal. In large corporations, these conflicts most frequently involve the enrichment of the firm’s executives or managers (in the form of money and perquisites or power and prestige) at the expense of the company’s shareholders. This usurping and reallocation of shareholder wealth is most likely to occur when shareholders do not have sufficient information about the decisions and actions being made by the firm’s management. Consider the following scenario and determine whether an agency conflict exists: Michael and Primalia equally own and manage A New Beginning (ANB), a store that sells preowned clothing and furniture. Michael is responsible for ANB’s back-office activities, and Primalia staffs the store and makes deliveries to customers. Both have equal decision-making…
Senior executives cannot be criminally prosecuted for the wrong doings they commit on behalf of the companies where they work. Group of answer choices True False