A recessive lethal allele has achieved a frequency of 0.22 due to genetic drift in a very small population. Based on natural selection, how would you expect the allele frequencies to change in the next three generations? (Note: Your calculation can assume that genetic drift is not altering allele frequencies in either direction.)

A recessive lethal allele has achieved a frequency of 0.22 due to genetic drift in a very small population. Based on natural selection, how would you expect the allele frequencies to change in the next three generations? (Note: Your calculation can assume that genetic drift is not altering allele frequencies in either direction.)

Human Heredity: Principles and Issues (MindTap Course List)

11th Edition

ISBN:9781305251052

Author:Michael Cummings

Publisher:Michael Cummings

Chapter19: Population Genetics And Human Evolution

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7QP: How Can We Measure Allele Frequencies in Populations? Drawing on your newly acquired understanding...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A recessive lethal allele has achieved a frequency of 0.22 due to genetic drift in a very small population. Based on natural selection, how would you expect the allele frequencies to change in the next three generations? Now: Your calculation can assume that genetic drift is not altering allele frequencies in either direction.
How does population size affect the likelihood of changes in allele frequencies by chance alone? Can significant changes in allele frequencies (that is, evolution) occur as a result of genetic drift?
If gene A/a is not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium due to natural selection such that individuals with the genotype AA have a fitness value of 1.0, heterozygotes have only slightly reduced fitness at 0.9, and individuals with the genotype aa have a fitness value of 0.6, what kind of change in allele frequency would you expect to see over time assuming you start with equal frequencies of the 2 alleles?
If a population is in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, where the dominant allele frequency is 0.2. Which of the following is true about the recessive allele frequency? Select the formula that you would use to find it. q = 1- 2pq q = p/2 q=1-p q = 0.05 then tell us if the statement "Populations in nature are ALWAYS in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium" is TRUE or FALSE
you (should have) learned that selection alone cannot purge a population of the very last copy of a deleterious allele. If selection is unable to do so, which of the remaining mechanisms (of the five Hardy-Weinberg) assumptions is MOST LIKELY to do so? Justify your answer. That is, why is the mechanism you picked the most likely to get rid of that last copy of a harmful allele?
The Hardy-Weinberg principle states that, in a large population, the proportion of each allele will do which of the following if there are no environmental forces on the population? increase for recessive alleles decrease for dominant alleles remain the same increase for dominant alleles
A hypothetical population of 10,000 humans has 6848 individuals with the blood type AA, 2846 individuals with blood type AB, and 306 individuals with the blood type BB. What is the frequency of each genotype in this population? What is the frequency of the A allele? What is the frequency of the B allele? If the next generation contained 25,000 individuals, how many individuals would have blood type BB, assuming the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?
There are 150 dominant homozygotes, 100 heterozygotes, and 50 recessive homozygotes in a population. How many dominant and how many recessive alleles are in this population? What would be there respective allele frequencies?
Why is it appropriate to define evolution as the change in allele frequencies of a population over time?
if a population of jumping spiders consists of 40 females and 40 males, what is the effective population size? Give the appropriate equation and show your work. Will genetic drift be an important evolutionary force in this population? Why or why not? If your answer is "yes", what does genetic drift do to allele frequencies? If your answer is "no", name two forces other than genetic drift that might be important in determining allele frequencies. asap
Which of the following statements most accurately describes the effects of genetic drift on a population? a. Populations of the same size will follow the same evolutionary trajectory when evolving due to drift. b. Genetic drift has the potential to drive evolution in all populations. c. Allele frequencies in a population of infinite size will ultimately drift to fixation or loss. d. The loss of otters in California due to excessive hunting cause a founder effect.
Which of the following statements about genetic drift is correct? Genetic drift causes predictable fluctuations in allele frequencies from one generation to the next and increases genetic variation within populations. Genetic drift causes predictable fluctuations in allele frequencies from one generation to the next and reduces genetic variation within populations. Genetic drift causes unpredictable fluctuations in allele frequencies from one generation to the next and does not affect genetic variation within populations. Genetic drift causes predictable fluctuations in allele frequencies from one generation to the next and do not affect genetic variation within populations. ) Genetic drift causes unpredictable fluctuations in allele frequencies from one generation to the next and tend to reduce genetic variation within populations.