Amy is a creditor of Bia. In order to escape the liability to Amy, Bia sells all his property to Cathy. May Amy ask for rescission of the contract of sale between Bia and Cathy? * Yes even if the right of levy and execution and accion subrogatoria are still available. Yes because creditors are protected in cases of contracts intended to defraud them. No because Amy is not a party to the contract. No because Amy has no right of rescission.

Amy is a creditor of Bia. In order to escape the liability to Amy, Bia sells all his property to Cathy. May Amy ask for rescission of the contract of sale between Bia and Cathy? * Yes even if the right of levy and execution and accion subrogatoria are still available. Yes because creditors are protected in cases of contracts intended to defraud them. No because Amy is not a party to the contract. No because Amy has no right of rescission.

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter8: Business Crime

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Ray loses his job as a result of a corporate downsizing. Consequently, he falls behind on the mortgage payments on his personal residence. His friend Ted would like to make the delinquent mortgage payments for him. a. Could the payments be structured so that Ray can deduct the mortgage interest? b. Could the payment arrangement deny both Ray and Ted a mortgage interest deduction? c. Could the payments be structured so that Ted can deduct the mortgage interest?
Due to his debt to Chur, Schwyz wrote a promissory note which is payable to the order of Chur. Chur's sister, Sion, misrepresenting herself as agent of Chur, obtained the note from Schwyz. Sion then negotiated the note to Lausanne after forging the signature of Chur. May Lausanne enforce the note against Schwyz? a. Yes, since Schwyz is the principal debtor. b. No, since it is Chur who can enforce it, the note being payable to the order of Chur. c. No, since the signature of Chur was forged. d. Yes, since Schwyz, as maker, is primarily liable on the note.
After agreeing to rent a car from Drive-Around Inc., Eden is given the keys to one of the agency’s cars by Fess, a Drive-Around employee. With respect to the bailed property, this is a. not a delivery. b. an involuntary delivery. c. a constructive delivery. d. a physical delivery.
Neil and Dylan are partners in a lawn mower repair business in Ohio. While Neil is on vacation visiting his sister in Georgia, his sister's neighbor has trouble with her mower and Neil fixes it for her. She insists on paying him . Neil : O a. may keep the money as this partnership is NOT a professional business pursuant to the non - professional exception rule. O b. may not accept the money because it would create a conflict of interest. O c. may keep the payment since he did the work while he was on vacation. O d. may not accept the money because it would mean he was taking a business opportunity away from the partnership. O e. must turn the money over to the partnership because he earned it doing the kind of work that the partnership does.
Lynn and Jack jointly own shares of stock of a corporation, have a joint bank account, and have purchased and own as tenants in common a piece of real estate. They share equally the dividends paid on the stock, the interest on the bank account, and the rent from the real estate. Without Lynn’s knowledge, Jack makes a trip to inspect the real estate and on his way runs over Samuel. Samuel sues Lynn and Jack for his personal injuries, joining Lynn as defendant on the theory that Lynn was Jack’s partner. Is Lynn a partner of Jack?
Jose sued Mari for breach of promise to marry. Mari lost the duly paid the court's award that included, among others, P100,000 as moral damages for the mental anguish Jose suffered. Did Jose earn a taxable income? He had no taxable income because it was a donation. He had no taxable income since moral damages are compensatory. He had taxable income since he made a profit. He had a taxable income of P100,000 since income is income from whatever source.
Fatima and Saira are sisters. They own a land. Fatima and Saira gave their land to Fatima's daughter, Mariam. The land was given to Mariam by Fatima on the condition that she will pay 200 OMR to Saira every year. The daughter agrees to the condition and signs the agreement, but later does not pay it. So, Saira has filed a complaint against Mariam. Questions a. Can Saira claim the payment from Mariam? Explain why or why not? b. Is the contract in this case enforceable by law? Explain why or why not?