Assume that items 1–8 are situations that Blas, CPA, has encountered during his audit of GELAY, Inc., a private company.
Assume that items 1–8 are situations that Blas, CPA, has encountered during his audit of GELAY, Inc., a private company.
List A represents the types of opinions the auditor ordinarily would issue, and List B represents a portion of the needed report modifications — whether an additional paragraph will be included. For each situation, select one response from List A and one (1) from List B. Select the best answers for each item the action the auditor would normally take. The types of opinions in List A and the report modifications in List B may be selected once, more than once, or not at all.
Assume the following:
- The auditor is
- The auditor previously expressed an unmodified opinion on the prior year’s financial
- Only single-year (not comparative) statements are presented for the current
- The conditions for an unmodified opinion exist unless contradicted by the
- The conditions stated in the items to be answered are material, unless otherwise
- Each item to be answered is independent of the
- No report modifications are to be made except in response to the factual
- The auditor will not treat a situation as an “emphasis of a matter” in what remains an unmodified audit report unless it is one of those circumstances specifically illustrated in the Professional Standards as an example of a matter an auditor may wish to
List A Types of opinions |
List B Report modifications |
A. Qualified opinion or adverse opinion |
H. Basis for Modification paragraph |
B. Qualified opinion or disclaimer of opinion |
I. Emphasis of Matter paragraph |
C. Either an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion |
J. Other Matter paragraph |
D. Qualified opinion |
K. No additional paragraph |
E. Unmodified opinion |
L. Describe the circumstances within the opinion paragraph |
F. An adverse opinion |
|
G. A disclaimer of opinion |
|
|
Types of Opinions (A–G) |
Additional Paragraph (H–L) |
1. Blas hired an actuary to assist in corroborating GELAY’s complex pension calculations concerning accrued pension liabilities that account for 35% of the client’s total liabilities. The actuary’s findings are reasonably close to GELAY’s calculations and support the financial statements. |
|
|
2. GELAY holds a note receivable consisting of principal and accrued interest receivable in 20X4. The note’s maker recently filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition, but GELAY failed to reduce the recorded value of the note to its net realizable value, which is approximately 20% of the recorded amount. |
|
|
3. Blas was engaged to audit a client’s financial statements after the annual physical inventory count. The accounting records were not sufficiently reliable to enable him to become satisfied as to the year-end inventory balances. |
|
|
4. Blas found an immaterial adjustment relating to inventory. GELAY has refused to adjust the financial statements to reflect this immaterial item. |
|
|
5. GELAY’s financial statements do not disclose certain long-term lease obligations. Blas determined that the accounting standards require the omitted disclosures. |
|
|
6. Blas decided not to take responsibility for the work of another CPA who audited a wholly-owned subsidiary of GELAY. The total assets and revenues of the subsidiary represent 27% and 28%, respectively, of the related consolidated totals. |
|
|
7. GELAY changed its method of accounting for the cost of inventories from first-in, first-out (FIFO) to last-in, first-out (LIFO). Blas concurs with the change, although it has a material effect on the comparability of the financial statements. |
|
|
8. Due to losses and adverse key financial ratios, Blas has substantial doubt about GELAY’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period. The client has adequately disclosed its financial difficulties in a note to its financial statements. Also, Blas has ruled out the use of a disclaimer of opinion. |
|
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps