At the a = 0.05 significance level, what is the most appropriate conclusion to draw from this test?Choose 1 answer:This is convincing evidence that the distribution of shot type differs between Tabitha andLauren.This isn't enough evidence to say that the distribution of shot type differs between Tabitha andLauren.This is convincing evidence that shot type and player are not independent.They lack evidence to say that shot type and player are not independent. Basketball players can take shots worth 3 points, 2 points, or 1 point. A scout is assessing two players-Tabitha and Lauren-who play for different teams in different leagues. The scout wonders if they havesimilar or different shot selections. They take a random sample of Tabitha's games and a separate randomsample of Lauren's games. They tally how many of each type of shot the players attempted in those games.Here is a summary and the results of a chi-square test:Chi-square test: Shot vs.playerTabitha Lauren3-point8 12Expected10.349.662-point4037Expected39.8337.171-point12Expected9.839.17x² = 2.097, DF = 2, P-value = 0.350%3DAssume that all conditions for inference were met.At the a = 0.05 significance level, what is the most appropriate conclusion to draw from this test?Choose 1 answer:This is convincing evidence that the distribution of shot type differs between Tabitha andLauren.

Name: At the a = 0.05 significance level, what is the most appropriate conc
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: At the a = 0.05 significance level, what is the most appropriate conclusion to draw from this test?Choose 1 answer:This is convincing evidence that the distribution of shot type differs between Tabitha andLauren.This isn't enough evidence to say tha

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/d97cf1f9-8de5-41a1-8f07-12dc80742821.jpg

Math

Statistics

At the a = 0.05 significance level, what is the most appropriate conclusion to draw from this test? Choose 1 answer: This is convincing evidence that the distribution of shot type differs between Tabitha and Lauren. This isn't enough evidence to say that the distribution of shot type differs between Tabitha and Lauren. This is convincing evidence that shot type and player are not independent. They lack evidence to say that shot type and player are not independent.