B. Richard's nickname is "No-Risk Rick" because he is an extremely risk-averse individual. His utility function is given by U(W) = √W. where W represents his current wealth in dollars. He currently has $100 worth of property, but there is a 50% chance that all of it will be stolen. What is Richard's expect wealth and expected utility of wealth? An insurance company offers to reimburse Richard for his loss if the money is stolen. What is the most that Richard would pay for such a policy?

B. Richard's nickname is "No-Risk Rick" because he is an extremely risk-averse individual. His utility function is given by U(W) = √W. where W represents his current wealth in dollars. He currently has $100 worth of property, but there is a 50% chance that all of it will be stolen. What is Richard's expect wealth and expected utility of wealth? An insurance company offers to reimburse Richard for his loss if the money is stolen. What is the most that Richard would pay for such a policy?

Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091985

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter9: The Basic Tools Of Finance

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Jamal has a utility function U = W1/2, where W is his wealth in millions of dollars and U is the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Jamal a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1 million with probability 0.6 and $9 million with probability 0.4. (1) Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected utility? Explain your reasoning with calculations. (2) Should Jamal pick A or B? Why? I would like help with the unanswered last parts of the questions.
Show, using equations or a diagram, that an expected utility maximizer requires a higher return for a riskier asset
. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) = square root x. There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?
. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) √x . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain.
Jamal has a utility function U = W1/2, where W is his wealth in millions of dollars and U is the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Jamal a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1 million with probability 0.6 and $9 million with probability 0.4. a. b. c. d. Graph Jamal’s utility function. Is he risk averse? Explain. (2+2) Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected prize? Explain your reasoning with appropriate calculations. (1) Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected utility? Explain your reasoning with calculations. (2) Should Jamal pick A or B? Why?
Consider an insurance contract with the premium r=$200 and payout q=$800. What is John’s expected income without this insurance contract? What is John’s expected income with this insurance contract?
Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) = square root x . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain
Stewart will have a total wealth of $12,000 this year, if he stays healthy. Suppose Stewart has a 50% chance of staying healthy and a 50% chance of getting sick. If Stewart gets sick, then he will have to pay $8,000 for medical bills, leaving him $4,000 of total wealth. Under these conditions, Stewarts expected wealth (a.k.a. expected value of wealth) is $8,000. Based on the graph shown below, what level of wealth with certainty (i.e., wealth that Stewart is certain to have) would make Stewart equally as happy as he is when facing the 50% chance of being sick?
. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain.
Please answer true or false for each of the following statements. A risk-averse consumer has increasing marginal utility. A risk-neutral consumer is willing to pay a positive risk-premium to avoid risk. A risk-neutral consumer has a linear utility function. A risk-loving consumer has a convex utility function. A risk-averse consumer can increase her expected utility by buying multiple stocks whose outcomes are not closely related, instead of buying only one stock.
Gary likes to gamble. Donna offers to bet him $31 on the outcome of a boat race. If Gary’s boat wins, Donna would give him $31. If Gary’s boat does not win, Gary would give her $31. Gary’s utility function is p1x^21+p2x^22, where p1 and p2 are the probabilities of events 1 and 2 and where x1 and x2 are his wealth if events 1 and 2 occur respectively. Gary’s total wealth is currently only $80 and he believes that the probability that he will win the race is 0.3. Which of the following is correct? (please submit the number corresponding to the correct answer). Taking the bet would reduce his expected utility. Taking the bet would leave his expected utility unchanged. Taking the bet would increase his expected utility. There is not enough information to determine whether taking the bet would increase or decrease his expected utility. The information given in the problem is self-contradictory.
Angie owns an endive farm that will be worth $90,000 or $0 with equal probability. Her Bernouilli utility function is u(w) =√w, where w is her wealth level (sum of initial wealth and the worth of the endive farm). 1. Suppose her firm is the only asset she has, that is, she has no initial wealth. What is the lowest price P at which she will agree to sell her endive farm before she knows how much it will be worth? 2. Redo part (1) assuming that she has $160,000 in her bank safe. 3. Compare and discuss your results in parts (1) and (2). What relationship can you find between Angie’s initial wealth level (zero versus $160,000) and her risk aversion?