Big Bear lake has 22 miles of shoreline and is an ideal place for paddle boarders. A researcher wants to know if the time it takes to paddle board across Big Bear Lake decrease when the paddle boarder listens to music? Nine paddle boarders were timed as they paddle boarded across Big Bear Lake while listening to music and again while not listening to music. The resulting times, in minutes, are shown in the table below. Paddle Boarding Time to Cross Big Bear Lake Listened to Music 44 38 49 50 40 45 45 41 54 No 47 44 52 5o 42 53 44 47 59 Music Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = 0.10 level of significance? For this study, we should use t-test for the difference between two dependent population means a. The null and altemative hypotheses would be: Họ: pd H: pd b. The test statistic t v = -3.600 (please round your answer to 3 decimal places.) c. The p-value = 0.0035 d. The p-value is 3 Va e. Based on this, we should (reject f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is less than the population mean paddle boarding time without music. (Please round your answer to 4 decimal places.) ]the null hypothesis. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the nine paddle boarder finished in less time on average with music compared to paddle boarding without music. The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is less than the population mean paddle boarding time without music. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is equal to the population mean paddle boarding time without music. g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O lf the sample mean paddle boarding time with music for the 9 paddle boarders is the same as the sample mean paddle boarding time without music for these 9 paddle boarders and if another 9 paddle boarders are observed paddle boarding the 10K with and without music then there would be a 0.35% chance of concluding that the mean paddle boarding time with music for the 9 paddle boarders is at least 3.6 minutes less than the mean paddle boarding time for these 9 paddle boarders without music. O There is a 0.35% chance of a Type I error. O There is a 0.35% chance that the mean paddle boarding time for the 9 paddle boarders with music is at least 3.6 minutes less than the mean time for these 9 paddle boarders without music. O lf the population mean paddle boarding time with music is the same as the population mean paddle boarding time without music and if another 9 paddle boarders compete with and without music then there would be a 0.35% chance that the mean paddle boarding time for the 9 paddle boarders would be at least 3.6 minutes less with music compared to them paddle

Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
4th Edition
ISBN:9781305071742
Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Chapter4: Exponential And Logarithmic Functions
Section4.CT: Chapter Test
Problem 13CT: An earthquake measuring 6.4 on the Richter scale struck Japan in July 2007, causing extensive...
icon
Related questions
Question
Big Bear lake has 22 miles of shoreline and is an ideal place for paddle boarders. A researcher wants to
know if the time it takes to paddle board across Big Bear Lake decrease when the paddle boarder listens to
music? Nine paddle boarders were timed as they paddle boarded across Big Bear Lake while listening to
music and again while not listening to music. The resulting times, in minutes, are shown in the table below.
Paddle Boarding Time to Cross Big Bear Lake
Listened
to Music
No
Music
44 38 49 50 40 45 45 41 54
47 44 52 50 42 53 44 47 59
Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = 0.10 level of significance?
For this study, we should use t-test for the difference between two dependent population means
a. The null and altenative hypotheses would be:
Ho: pd
H: pd
μα
b. The test statistic t v= -3.600
(please round your answer to 3 decimal places.)
%3D
c. The p-value = 0.0035
(Please round your answer to 4 decimal places.)
d. The p-value is sva
e. Based on this, we should reject
f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
v the null hypothesis.
O The results are statistically insignificant at oa = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to
conclude that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is less than the population
mean paddle boarding time without music.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the nine paddle boarder finished in less time on average with music compared to paddle
boarding without music.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is less than the population mean
paddle boarding time without music.
O The results are statistically insignificant at oa = 0.10, so there is statistically significant
evidence to conclude that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is equal to
the population mean paddle boarding time without music.
g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
O f the sample mean paddle boarding time with music for the 9 paddle boarders is the same as
the sample mean paddle boarding time without music for these 9 paddle boarders and if
another 9 paddle boarders are observed paddle boarding the 1OK with and without music then
there would be a 0.35% chance of concluding that the mean paddle boarding time with music
for the 9 paddle boarders is at least 3.6 minutes less than the mean paddle boarding time for
these 9 paddle boarders without music.
O There is a 0.35% chance of a Type I error.
O There is a 0.35% chance that the mean paddle boarding time for the 9 paddle boarders with
music is at least 3.6 minutes less than the mean time for these 9 paddle boarders without
music.
O f the population mean paddle boarding time with music is the same as the population mean
paddle boarding time without music and if another 9 paddle boarders compete with and
without music then there would be a 0.35% chance that the mean paddle boarding time for the
9 paddle boarders would be at least 3.6 minutes less with music compared to them paddle
boarding without music.
Transcribed Image Text:Big Bear lake has 22 miles of shoreline and is an ideal place for paddle boarders. A researcher wants to know if the time it takes to paddle board across Big Bear Lake decrease when the paddle boarder listens to music? Nine paddle boarders were timed as they paddle boarded across Big Bear Lake while listening to music and again while not listening to music. The resulting times, in minutes, are shown in the table below. Paddle Boarding Time to Cross Big Bear Lake Listened to Music No Music 44 38 49 50 40 45 45 41 54 47 44 52 50 42 53 44 47 59 Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = 0.10 level of significance? For this study, we should use t-test for the difference between two dependent population means a. The null and altenative hypotheses would be: Ho: pd H: pd μα b. The test statistic t v= -3.600 (please round your answer to 3 decimal places.) %3D c. The p-value = 0.0035 (Please round your answer to 4 decimal places.) d. The p-value is sva e. Based on this, we should reject f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... v the null hypothesis. O The results are statistically insignificant at oa = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is less than the population mean paddle boarding time without music. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the nine paddle boarder finished in less time on average with music compared to paddle boarding without music. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is less than the population mean paddle boarding time without music. O The results are statistically insignificant at oa = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean paddle boarding time with music is equal to the population mean paddle boarding time without music. g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O f the sample mean paddle boarding time with music for the 9 paddle boarders is the same as the sample mean paddle boarding time without music for these 9 paddle boarders and if another 9 paddle boarders are observed paddle boarding the 1OK with and without music then there would be a 0.35% chance of concluding that the mean paddle boarding time with music for the 9 paddle boarders is at least 3.6 minutes less than the mean paddle boarding time for these 9 paddle boarders without music. O There is a 0.35% chance of a Type I error. O There is a 0.35% chance that the mean paddle boarding time for the 9 paddle boarders with music is at least 3.6 minutes less than the mean time for these 9 paddle boarders without music. O f the population mean paddle boarding time with music is the same as the population mean paddle boarding time without music and if another 9 paddle boarders compete with and without music then there would be a 0.35% chance that the mean paddle boarding time for the 9 paddle boarders would be at least 3.6 minutes less with music compared to them paddle boarding without music.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Linear Equations
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305071742
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra
ISBN:
9780395977224
Author:
Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:
McDougal Littell
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Algebra
Elementary Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9780998625713
Author:
Lynn Marecek, MaryAnne Anthony-Smith
Publisher:
OpenStax - Rice University
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL