Case: The Reluctant Receptionist Superior Products Company has recently hired a new HR assistant, Virginia Fisher, who just received a college degree. Frederick Mills, the HR Director, was extremely pleased to find someone who had some familiarity with basic management concepts because he was the entire HR department except for a clerk-typist. During the interview Frederick emphasized that he planned to have Virginia function as his assistant and that she would be doing some interviewing and be responsible for maintaining employee records. Because Superior has over 300 employees, Frederick had been too busy to prepare anything resembling a job description except for some scrawled notes on the back of an envelope. Everything went fine for the first week for Virginia. On Monday of the second week, Frederick called Virginia into his office and explained that there was another minor duty that he had not mentioned to her. Frederick said, “In order to get approval to hire you from the president. I had to agree that whoever was hired would be the relief receptionist from 11:30 to 12:30 every day. The switchboard is usually quite busy and we wanted to be sure someone who is capable would be the backup.” Virginia was not very happy about this assignment being sprung on her, but she agreed to try it for a while. Within two weeks she was beginning to dread having to work the switchboard an hour everyday. Also, she discovered that she was expected to be the relief if the receptionist was sick or unable to work. On Wednesday and Thursday of the third week the regular receptionist was sick and Virginia filled in for her. On Friday, Virginia told Frederick she was quitting in two weeks. When asked why, Virginia replied, “You misrepresented the job to me. You never said anything about my receptionist duties. If you had, I probably would not have taken the job.” What could possibly happen in the not to distant future if the company chooses not to make any changes in their hiring process?
Case: The Reluctant Receptionist
Superior Products Company has recently hired a new HR assistant, Virginia Fisher, who just received a college degree. Frederick Mills, the HR Director, was extremely pleased to find someone who had some familiarity with basic management concepts because he was the entire HR department except for a clerk-typist. During the interview Frederick emphasized that he planned to have Virginia function as his assistant and that she would be doing some interviewing and be responsible for maintaining employee records. Because Superior has over 300 employees, Frederick had been too busy to prepare anything resembling a job description except for some scrawled notes on the back of an envelope.
Everything went fine for the first week for Virginia. On Monday of the second week, Frederick called Virginia into his office and explained that there was another minor duty that he had not mentioned to her. Frederick said, “In order to get approval to hire you from the president. I had to agree that whoever was hired would be the relief receptionist from 11:30 to 12:30 every day. The switchboard is usually quite busy and we wanted to be sure someone who is capable would be the backup.” Virginia was not very happy about this assignment being sprung on her, but she agreed to try it for a while.
Within two weeks she was beginning to dread having to work the switchboard an hour everyday. Also, she discovered that she was expected to be the relief if the receptionist was sick or unable to work. On Wednesday and Thursday of the third week the regular receptionist was sick and Virginia filled in for her. On Friday, Virginia told Frederick she was quitting in two weeks. When asked why, Virginia replied, “You misrepresented the job to me. You never said anything about my receptionist duties. If you had, I probably would not have taken the job.”
- What could possibly happen in the not to distant future if the company chooses not to make any changes in their hiring process?
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
