Coal mining is a very dangerous occupation. Suppose that the government requires coal mining companies to implement additional safety features to make coal mining safer. Explain whether or not these additional safety features will make coal miners better off. (Note that this question asks about the coal miners – the workers – not about the coal mining companies – the employers.)

Coal mining is a very dangerous occupation. Suppose that the government requires coal mining companies to implement additional safety features to make coal mining safer. Explain whether or not these additional safety features will make coal miners better off. (Note that this question asks about the coal miners – the workers – not about the coal mining companies – the employers.)

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter19: The Problem Of Adverse Selection

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 19.4IP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Problem: Consider a state in which automobile drivers are divided equally into two types of drivers: careful and reckless. The average annual auto-insurance claim is $400 for a careful driver and $1,200 for a reckless driver. Suppose that the state adopts an insurance system under which all drivers are placed in a common pool and allocated to insurance companies randomly. An insurance company cannot refuse coverage to any consumer it is assigned, but a consumer who is unhappy with the insurance company has the option of being reassigned (randomly) to another. By law, each insurance company must charge the same price to all its customers (i.e. no price discrimination). Assume that the insurance market is perfectly competitive and that claims represent all the costs associated with provision of insurance. Predict the minimum price of auto insurance under two alternative policy scenarios given below. Show all of your work and explain your answers. A. Auto insurance is mandatory B. Auto…
Suppose there are two types of persons: high-ability and low-ability. A particular diploma costs a high-ability person $8,000 and costs a low-ability person $20,000. Firms wish to use education as a screening device where they intend to pay $25,000 to workers without a diploma and $ K to those with a diploma. In what range must K be to make this an effective screening device?
Do firms have the right to drug test all job applicants and refuse to hire applicants who test positive for drug use, even if the job in question has no safety or sensitivity concerns?
The bar exam for lawyers is written by practicing lawyers. Why might having practicing lawyers write the exam limit the entry of new lawyers into the profession? Why might they want to limit entry?
Suppose there are two types of persons: high-ability and low-ability. Firms wish to use education as a screening device where they intend to pay $25,000 to workers without a diploma and $35,000 to those with a diploma. Assume it costs $8,000 of for a high-ability person to obtain a diploma. If is cost $10,000 for a low-ability person to obtain a diploma, can the firm use diploma to screen low ability from high ability worker. Explain and support your answer using math. How would your answer change it the cost of obtaining a diploma for a low productivity person were to increase to $15,000.
Insurance premiums are very high for young drivers largely due to the fact that young drivers get into more automobile accidents than other drivers. Do you think that it is fair that young people are charged more for the same insurance that other drivers have? Is it fair that regardless of how good of a driver is, just because a driver is young he or she is charged more for their car insurance?
A young person entering the job market may be talented or untalented.Suppose that one-quarter of high school graduates are talented, and the rest untalented. A recent high school graduate, who knows whether or not he is talented, has the option of spending a year traveling overseas or enrolling at college (we will assume that he or she cannot do both) before applying for a job. An employer seeking to fill a job opening cannot know whether or not a job applicant is talented; all he knows is that the applicant either went to college or traveled overseas. The payoff an employer gets from hiring a worker depends solely on the talents of the hired worker (and not on his educational level), while the payoff to the youth depends on what he chose to do after high school, on his talents (because talented students enjoy their studies at college more than untalented students), and on whether or not he gets a job. These payoffs are described in the following tables (where the employer is the row…
If occupational safety laws were changed so that firms no longer had to take expensive steps to meet regulatory requirements, we would expect
Recently in the City of Seoul, building contractors lobbied the city council to pass an ordinace requiring all people working on residential dwellings be licensed by the city. Why would the contractors lobby for this requirement? A. to create legal barrier to entry B. to reduce the cost of building dwellings C. to guarantee that work on dwellings is of high quality D. to avoid informal settlers
As an employer, suppose you find it costly to monitor employee effort 100 percent of the time. What compensation options, in terms of the basis of pay, are available to ensure that you get appropriate levels of employee effort? What factors would you consider in choosing among these options?
A medical researcher is trying to cure a disease. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she generates a utility benefit of 10 for each member of society. There are 1,000 people in society besides the medical researcher. The medical researcher doesn’t care about other people. She is in it for the glory. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she gets a utility benefit of 1000 (which is inclusive of the 10 that she gets for being a member of society, plus a payoff of 990 in glory). If she exerts effort e, she also suffers cost e^2. (a) The medical researcher’s payoff from exerting effort e is 1000e − e^2. What level of effort, e∗, will she exert? (b) Suppose a policymaker who was a committed utilitarian (including caring about the medical researcher’s glory, since the medical researcher cares about it) was to choose the level of effort the medical researcher exerts. That policymaker would add up the total utility in society (including the medical researcher’s utility)…
A medical researcher is trying to cure a disease. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she generates a utility benefit of 10 for each member of society. There are 1,000 people in society besides the medical researcher. The medical researcher doesn’t care about other people. She is in it for the glory. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she gets a utility benefit of 1000 (which is inclusive of the 10 that she gets for being a member of society, plus a payoff of 990 in glory). If she exerts effort e, she also suffers cost e^2. (a) Suppose a policymaker who was a committed utilitarian (including caring about the medical researcher’s glory, since the medical researcher cares about it) was to choose the level of effort the medical researcher exerts. That policymaker would add up the total utility in society (including the medical researcher’s utility) from any given level of effort and choose the level of effort that maximizes that aggregate utility. i. What (social)…