Coke 49.6% Pepsi 46.2% Others 4.2% Under what market structure do Pepsi and Coke operate? How can you explain the pricing behavior of Pepsi and Coke? Given the obvious market share of both Pepsi and Coke, on what grounds would you justify the multi-billion-dollar annual advertising spending by those two companies?

Coke 49.6% Pepsi 46.2% Others 4.2% Under what market structure do Pepsi and Coke operate? How can you explain the pricing behavior of Pepsi and Coke? Given the obvious market share of both Pepsi and Coke, on what grounds would you justify the multi-billion-dollar annual advertising spending by those two companies?

Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Course List)

16th Edition

ISBN:9781305506725

Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson

Publisher:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson

Chapter24: Price-searcher Markets With High Entry Barriers

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13CQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

the annual global market share of Pepsi and Coke for the last five years on average. COKE 49.6 PEPSI 46.2 OTHERS 4.2Under what market structure do Pepsi and Coke operate? How can you explain the pricing behavior of Pepsi and Coke? Given the obvious market share of both Pepsi and Coke, on what grounds would you justify the multi-billion-dollar annual advertising spending by those two companies?Best
Consider the market for cola soft drinks where Pepsi and Coke are dominating this market with well above 90% markets share combined. Under what market structure do Pepsi and Coke operate? What microeconomic model can best describe the behavior of Pepsi and Coke? Explain the main theme of this model. Given the obvious market share of both Pepsi and Coke, on what grounds would you justify the multibillion-dollar annual advertising spending by those two companies?
The pie-chart given below shows the annual global market share of Pepsi and Coke for the last five years on average.Under what market structure do Pepsi and Coke operate? How can you explain the pricing behavior of Pepsi and Coke? Given the obvious market share of both Pepsi and Coke, on what grounds would you justify the multi-billion-dollar annual advertising spending by those two
Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are the leading competitors in the market for cola products. In 1960 Coca-Cola introduced Sprite, which today is among the worldwide leaders in the lemon-lime soft drink market and ranks in the top 10 among all soft drinks worldwide. Prior to 1999, PepsiCo did not have a product that competed directly against Sprite and had to decide whether to introduce such a soft drink. By not introducing a lemon-lime soft drink, PepsiCo would continue to earn a $200 million profit, and Coca-Cola would continue to earn a $300 million profit. Suppose that by introducing a new lemon-lime soft drink, one of two possible strategies could be pursued: - PepsiCo could trigger a price war with Coca-Cola in both the lemon-lime and cola markets - Coca-Cola could acquiesce and each firm maintains its current 50/50 split of the cola market and split the lemon-lime market 30/70 (PepsiCo/Coca-Cola). - If PepsiCo introduced a lemon-lime soft drink and a price war resulted, both companies…
Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are the leading competitors in the market for cola products. In 1960 Coca-Cola introduced Sprite, which today is the worldwide leader in the lemon-lime soft drink market and ranks fourth among all soft drinks worldwide. Prior to 1999, PepsiCo did not have a product that competed directly against Sprite and had to decide whether to introduce such a soft drink. By not introducing a lemon-lime drink, PepsiCo would continue to earn a $200 million profit and Coca-Cola would continue to earn a $300 million profit. Suppose that by introducing a new lemon-lime soft drink, one of two possible strategies could be pursued: (1) PepsiCo could trigger a price war with Coca-Cola in both lemon-lime and cola markets or (2) Coca-Cola could acquiesce and each firm maintains its current 50/50 split of the cola market and split the lemon-lime market 70/30 in favor of Coca-Cola. If Pepsi introduced a lemon-lime drink and a price war resulted, both companies would earn profits of $100…
Evidence of domination Both the Competition Commission and Icasa found, in their inquiries, that Vodacom and MTN are dominantacross the supply chain. Their dominance is even more entrenched by the spectrum-sharing deals that they haveentered into with Cell C, Liquid Intelligent Technologies and Rain. Cell C is wholly reliant on MTN and Vodacomto provide mobile services, and Liquid and Rain are disincentivised from competing aggressively in the mobilemarket due to the lucrative deals they have struck to provide capacity to either Vodacom or MTN, or both. Thishas limited their ability to compete independently – leaving Telkom as the only entity in the position to be able tochallenge the “cosy” market structure head-on. 1.2 The behaviour of the companies in the extract is in line with which of the following economic schools of thought? a) The Free Market Schoolb) Marxist Economicsc) Socialist Economicsd) A Planned Economy
Evidence of domination Both the Competition Commission and Icasa found, in their inquiries, that Vodacom and MTN are dominantacross the supply chain. Their dominance is even more entrenched by the spectrum-sharing deals that they haveentered into with Cell C, Liquid Intelligent Technologies and Rain. Cell C is wholly reliant on MTN and Vodacomto provide mobile services, and Liquid and Rain are disincentivised from competing aggressively in the mobilemarket due to the lucrative deals they have struck to provide capacity to either Vodacom or MTN, or both. Thishas limited their ability to compete independently – leaving Telkom as the only entity in the position to be able tochallenge the “cosy” market structure head-on.The economic argument being expressed in this extract is that of __________ and has the consequence of______________.a) Market failure, externalities.b) Government failure, public goods being under-produced.c) Market failure, inefficient allocation of resources.d)…
Choose the most appropriate answer. 1.1 Read the following extract and answer question 1.1, 1.2. Evidence of dominationBoth the Competition Commission and Icasa found, in their inquiries, that Vodacom and MTN are dominantacross the supply chain. Their dominance is even more entrenched by the spectrum-sharing deals that they haveentered into with Cell C, Liquid Intelligent Technologies and Rain. Cell C is wholly reliant on MTN and Vodacomto provide mobile services, and Liquid and Rain are disincentivised from competing aggressively in the mobilemarket due to the lucrative deals they have struck to provide capacity to either Vodacom or MTN, or both. Thishas limited their ability to compete independently – leaving Telkom as the only entity in the position to be able tochallenge the “cosy” market structure head-on.Source: https://techcentral.co.za/mcleod-is-wrong-about-telkom/110373/Accessed: 19/08/21 The economic argument being expressed in this extract is that of __________ and has the…
9. Firms 1 and 2 are proposing to merge. They offer symmetrically differentiated products and have identical costs and, therefore, identical premerger prices. (Note that “symmetrically differentiated products” means that if they charge the same price, then they have the same demand.) The common premerger price for firms 1 and 2 is $90, and the common marginal cost is $60. If firm 1 were to raise its price to $100, we know that its demand would drop by 20 units and firm 2’s demand would rise by 5 units. a. Assume the merger would reduce marginal cost by 10 percent. Using UPP, is there reason to be concerned with the merger? b. Suppose the prospective merger partners want to convince the DOJ that the merger will not raise price. Using UPP, how large must they argue the efficiency is? c. Suppose there are improved estimates of firms’ demand functions and now we know that if firm 1 were to raise its price to $100, its demand would (still) drop by 20 units, but firm 2’s demand would rise by…
Pizza Hut and Domino's are the leading pizza chains in terms of market share. If the price of Domino's rises significantly, all else equal, what impact will that have on Pizza Hut? Pizza Hut's demand will shift left Pizza Hut's demand will shift right Pizza Hut's supply will shift left Pizza Hut's supply will shift right
suppose fiat recently entered into an agreement and plan of merger with case for $4.3 billion. prior to the merger, the market for four wheel drive tractors consisted of five firms. the market was highly concentrated, with herfindahl-hirschman index of 2,915. case's share of that market was 13 percent, while fiat comprised just 7 percent of the market. if approved, by how much would the post merger herfindahl-hirschman index increase
Explain how either economic profit or loss minimization could be representative of the short-run profitability realized by firms within a monopolistically competitive market, but breakeven or normal profit, represents the definitive long-run profitability that will come to exist for the firms operating in that market.