Consider a Cournot oligopoly with three firms = 1,2,3. All firms have the same constant marginal cost c 1. The inverse demand = function of the market is given by P = 9-Q, where P is the market price, and Q = ³ is the aggregate output. i=1 qi a) Solve for the Nash equilibrium of the game including firm out- puts, market price, aggregate output, and firm profits (Hint: the NE is symmetric). (b) Now suppose these three firms play a 2-stage game. In stage 1, they produce capacities 1, 2 and 3, which are equal to the Nash equilibrium quantities of the Cournot game characterised by part (a). In stage 2, they simultaneously decide on their prices P1, P2 and P3. The marginal cost for each firm to sell up to capacity is 0. It is impossible to sell more than capacity. The residual demand for firm i is Di (pi, p-i) = = 9 Pi - 9-Pi 3 9- Pi if pip; for all j‡ i if pip for all ji = Pj if pip; for all ji • (Note, here we assume that the efficient/parallel rationing ap- plies). Prove that it is a Nash equilibrium of the second stage subgame that each firm charges the market clearing price p* 9-91 - 92 - 93. =
Consider a Cournot oligopoly with three firms = 1,2,3. All firms have the same constant marginal cost c 1. The inverse demand = function of the market is given by P = 9-Q, where P is the market price, and Q = ³ is the aggregate output. i=1 qi a) Solve for the Nash equilibrium of the game including firm out- puts, market price, aggregate output, and firm profits (Hint: the NE is symmetric). (b) Now suppose these three firms play a 2-stage game. In stage 1, they produce capacities 1, 2 and 3, which are equal to the Nash equilibrium quantities of the Cournot game characterised by part (a). In stage 2, they simultaneously decide on their prices P1, P2 and P3. The marginal cost for each firm to sell up to capacity is 0. It is impossible to sell more than capacity. The residual demand for firm i is Di (pi, p-i) = = 9 Pi - 9-Pi 3 9- Pi if pip; for all j‡ i if pip for all ji = Pj if pip; for all ji • (Note, here we assume that the efficient/parallel rationing ap- plies). Prove that it is a Nash equilibrium of the second stage subgame that each firm charges the market clearing price p* 9-91 - 92 - 93. =
Chapter15: Imperfect Competition
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 15.3P
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 14 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305971493
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305971493
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning