Consider an economy with two people, Li and Carlo, and two commodities, clothing and food. Currently, Li and Carlo would both be willing to give up 0.5 articles of clothing for one piece of food. Further, the workers in town can, in a given day, produce either 10 pieces of clothing or 50 pieces of food. Is the allocation of resources in this economy Pareto efficient? If not, should there be more clothing or more food? (Let the MRS=MUfood/MUclothing=the value of food in terms of clothing=how much clothing we would trade for 1 more food)

Consider an economy with two people, Li and Carlo, and two commodities, clothing and food. Currently, Li and Carlo would both be willing to give up 0.5 articles of clothing for one piece of food. Further, the workers in town can, in a given day, produce either 10 pieces of clothing or 50 pieces of food. Is the allocation of resources in this economy Pareto efficient? If not, should there be more clothing or more food? (Let the MRS=MUfood/MUclothing=the value of food in terms of clothing=how much clothing we would trade for 1 more food)

Principles of Microeconomics

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305156050

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter22: Frontiers Of Microeconomics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two people in the market for tilapia, Reagan and Cheryl. The marginal benefit curves for both individuals are shown in the accompanying graph. a. Suppose the market price of tilapia is $2.00 per pound. Move point A to Cheryl’s quantity purchased. Move point B to Reagan’s quantity purchased. b. How many pounds of tilapia do they collectively purchase? _________ pounds c. To achieve an efficient allocation, Cheryl should purchase _______(more tilapia than, the same amount of tilapia as, less tilapia than) she is currently purchasing, and Reagan should purchase ________ (more tilapia than, the same amount of tilapia as, less tilapia than) she is currently purchasing.
Amy and Lela have following preferences for apples, pears and bananas where > means "preferred to." Amy: apple > pear > banana Lela: banana > apple > pear Assume there is one apple, one banana and one pear to divide between Amy and Lela and that they have no other goods. For each of the following allocations, say whether it is (Pareto) efficient or inefficient. 1. Amy gets the apple and the pear and Lela gets the banana [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"] 2. Amy gets the banana and Lela gets the apple and the pear [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"] 3. Amy gets the pear, apple and banana and Lela gets nothing [ Select ] ["Efficient", "Inefficient"]
Come up with an example with four agents and four items in which there is only one Pareto efficient allocation
The allocation where D1, D2, D3, D4, and D8 consume and S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 sell is not Pareto efficient because... (hint: you can prove that an allocation is not Pareto Efficient by showing that there's a better way to allocate the widget. Which of the following choices is better (more efficient) than the proposed allocation where D1, D2, D3, D4, and D8 consume and S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 sell?) Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Jane has 11 liters of soft drinks and 10 sandwiches. Bob, on the other hand, has 9 liters of soft drinks and 10 sandwiches. With these endowments, Jane's marginal rate of substitution (MRS) of soft drinks for sandwiches is 6 and Bob's MRS is equal to 8. Draw an Edgeworth box diagram to show whether this allocation of resources is efficient. If it is explain why. If it is not, what changes will make both parties better off? Part 2 1.) Using the three-point curved line drawing tool, draw an indifference curve for Jane when consuming 11 liters of soft drinks and 10 sandwiches. Label this curve UJ. 2.) Using the three-point curved line drawing tool, draw an indifference curve for Bob when consuming 9 liters of soft drinks and 10 sandwiches. Label this curve UB.
Two individuals, Fred and Helen, are in an economy with no production, and each have the utility function U = 10XY. Prices of both X and Y are set at $1. Initial endowments for Fred are 10 units of X and 6 units of Y. Helen has 8 units of X and 12 units of Y. Find the general equilibrium prices and allocation, then show that the G.E. allocation is Pareto efficient.
I need help with this homework problem. Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X,Y) = (X^1/2)*(Y^1/2) UB(X,Y) = X + Y The initial endowments are: A: X = 8; Y = 3 B: X = 4; Y = 5 What is the marginal rate of substitution for consumer A at the initial allocation? What is the marginal rate of substitution for consumer B at the initial allocation? Is the initial allocation Pareto Efficient?
Grapes and bananas are perfect complements for Jane and Betty. Jane eats one grape per three bananas.; Betty eats three grapes per one banana. Once they go to sports for hours, Jane had 20 grapes and 10 bananas and Betty had 10 grapes and 20 bananas. (assume that grapes and bananas can be divided into half) 1. Dar the Edgeworth box and show all Pareto optimal allocations of grapes and bananas between Jane and Betty.
Consider the figure attached which shows the combined production function of Anna and Bob.Suppose a scenario where the Government has introduced a new social welfare program to cater to the poor of the society, wherein the reservation wage increases from 2 bushels of wheat to 6 bushels of wheat. Draw a new diagram to show the impact of this welfare program and comment on who do you think would benefit from this intervention? Additionally, does the outcome of this intervention results in an allocation which is a pareto efficient one? Explain your reasoning. (Make sure your diagram is fully labelled)
Use the Fundamental Theorem of Exchange and draw Edgeworth Box diagrams to show the conditions necessary for an 'efficient' allocation of two goods between two individuals. Use this model to evaluate the statement: "If two individuals have identical endowments of both goods there are no possible gains from trade". Hint: you need to develop your explanation of the theory and the efficiencyconditions step-by-step. You need to draw several diagrams showing Edgeworth Box
Figure shows the combined production function of Angela and Bruno. If the government introduces a new social welfare program to cater to the poor of the society, wherein the reservation wage increases from 2 bushels of wheat to 6 bushels of wheat how would you model the situation? Draw a new diagram to show the impact of this welfare program and comment on who do you think would benefit from this intervention? Additionally, does the outcome of this intervention results in an allocation which is a pareto efficient one? Explain your reasoning. (Please Make sure your diagram is fully labelled)
Alice can produce goods X and Y. It takes her 1 hour of labor to produce 2 units of X. It takes 2 hours of labor to produce three units of Y. If Alice divides four hours of her time between the two tasks, which of the following (X, Y) allocations are efficient? Could be more then one answer. (3, 4) (8, 0) (4, 3) (5, 1)