Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of30 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 4 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same.Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2016 and 2046.HermesLabor ForceOutputPhysical Capital(Tools per worker)11Productivity(Gobs per worker)Year(Workers)(Gobs of goo)2016303,000204615303,600Labor ForceOutputProductivityPhysical Capital(Tools per worker)Year(Workers)(Gobs of goo) (Gobs per worker)20168302,400204612303,600Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Hermes than in Gribinez. From 2016 to 2046, capital per worker rises by 4 units in eachcountry. The 4-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Hermes to rise by aamount than productivity in Gribinez. Thisillustrates theeffect.Gribinez

The per unit goods and services generated by an input in a production process is called as the…

Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 30 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 4 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2016 and 2046. Hermes Physical Capital Labor Force Output (Gobs of goo) Productivity (Gobs per worker) Year (Tools per worker) (Workers) 2016 11 30 3,000 2046 15 30 3,600 Physical Capital Labor Force Output Productivity (Gobs per worker) Year (Tools per worker) (Gobs of goo) (Workers) 30 2016 8 2,400 2046 12 30 3,600 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Hermes than in Gribinez. From 2016 to 2046, capital per worker rises by 4 units in each country. The 4-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Hermes to rise by a amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates the effect. Gribinez

Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 30 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 4 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2016 and 2046. Hermes Physical Capital Labor Force Output (Gobs of goo) Productivity (Gobs per worker) Year (Tools per worker) (Workers) 2016 11 30 3,000 2046 15 30 3,600 Physical Capital Labor Force Output Productivity (Gobs per worker) Year (Tools per worker) (Gobs of goo) (Workers) 30 2016 8 2,400 2046 12 30 3,600 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Hermes than in Gribinez. From 2016 to 2046, capital per worker rises by 4 units in each country. The 4-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Hermes to rise by a amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates the effect. Gribinez

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter20: Economic Growth In The Global Economy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the economies of Sporon and Gobbledigook, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 20 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2015 and 2035. Sporon Year Physical Capital (Tools per worker) Labor Force (Workers) Output (Gobs of goo) Productivity (Gobs per worker) 2015 11 30 1,800 2035 16 30 2,160 Gobbledigook Year Physical Capital (Tools per worker) Labor Force (Workers) Output (Gobs of goo) Productivity (Gobs per worker) 2015 8 30 900 2035 13 30 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Sporon than in Gobbledigook. From 2015 to 2035, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker…
Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce gaggles of gop using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 10 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2016 and 2026. **THE TABLE IS ATTACHED** Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Hermes than in Gribinez. From 2016 to 2026, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Hermes to rise by a _________ (LARGER/SMALLER) amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates the _______ (CATCH-UP/NATURAL RESOURCES/TECHNOLOGY/HUMAN CAPITAL) effect. THANK YOU FOR THE HELP
Consider the economies of Hermes and Gobbledigook, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 20 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 4 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labour force remains the same. first dropdown question options are (larger or smaller), second dropdown question options are (the brain drain, inward orietned growth, diminishing returns, constant returns, increasing returns), the third dropdown question oprions are (more diffucult or easier)
Suppose that country A and country B currently have identical production possibility frontiers, but that country A devotes only 5 per cent of its resources producing capital goods over each of the next 10 years, whereas country B devotes 30 per cent. Which country is likely to experience more rapid economic growth in the future? Illustrate using a production possibility frontier graph. Your graph should include production possibility frontiers for country A today and in 10 years, and for country B today and in 10 years.
Consider a small island country whose only industry is fishing. The following table presents information about this small economy in two different years. Complete the table by calculating physical capital per worker and labor productivity. Hint: Recall that productivity is defined as the amount of goods and services a worker can produce per hour. In this problem, measure productivity as the quantity of goods per hour of labor. Year Physical Capital Labor Force Physical Capital per Worker Labor Hours Output Labor Productivity (Fishing poles) (Workers) (Fishing poles) (Hours) (Fish) 2027 120 60 1x 3,000 21,000 3x 2028 400 100 2x 3,500 49,000 4x Based on your calculations, (an increase/a decrease) in physical capital per worker from 2027 to 2028 is associated with (an increase/a decrease) in labor productivity from 2027 to 2028. Suppose you're in charge of establishing economic policy for this small island country. Which…
Show that, when using a traditional economic production function,doubling our population can double our output if capital stocks alsodouble. Use the production function: Q = AK L , where A representstechnology in an economy, K capital, and L labor. Double K and L andshow that Q also doubles, assuming α=β=1/2. Now show that, when we incorporate natural capital into thediscussion, doubling the population does not increase output in thesame way (since natural capital cannot also grow). Use theproduction function: Q = AK L N , where N is natural capital. DoubleK and L and show that Q less than doubles, assuming α=β=γ=1/3.
Some resource-rich countries have succeeded in converting resource wealth into longterm and equitable economic development, while many others have not. Naturalresources have played a fundamental role in the growth of several industrializedeconomies, including Germany and the United Kingdom, where coal and iron ore depositswere a precondition for the Industrial Revolution. The United States was the world’sleading mineral economy from the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century and in thesame period became the world’s leader in manufacturing (van der Ploeg 2011). Morerecently, countries such as Botswana, Chile, and Norway have used abundant oil andmineral resources as the foundation for economic growth. However, in many othercountries, resource extraction appears to have undermined governance, fed corruptionand capital flight, and increased inequality.Required:(a) Discuss the main challenges posed by resource revenues; and(b) Discuss the special fiscal institutions and mechanisms…
In 1998, Brazil had a per capita GDP of about $4,500, compared to per capita GDP of about $28,000 in the US. (A) If per capita growth were to average 2% per year indefinitely in the US and 5% per year in Brazil, how many years would it take Brazil to catch up with the US? (B) Using the assumptions of the Cobb-Douglas production function, how fast would capital stock have to grow for per capita GDP to rise 5% per year? How does that compare with capital stock growth of 3% per year in the US (assume technology advances 1% per year in both countries)? (C) In mature industrialized societies, the capital/output ratio is approximately 3.0. If the average depreciation rate is 0.04, what would be the current saving and investment ratio in the US? What would it be in Brazil if per capita GDP rose 5% per year?
Consider the following (made-up) statistics for some econ-omies. Assume the exponent on capital is 1/3 and that the labor composition is unchanged. For each economy, compute the growth rate of TFP.(a) A European economy: gY/L = 0.03, gK/L = 0.03.(b) A Latin American economy: gY/L = 0.02, gK/L = 0.01.(c) An Asian economy: gY/L = 0.06, gK/L = 0.15.
Country Has Cobb-Douglas production function: Y(it) = A(it) x K(it)1/3L(it)2/3 Where: Y(it) = realGDP K(it) = Capital L(it) = No. workers employed in country (i) on date (t) Suppose multiple countries share the same alpha = 1/3 but different levels of totalfactorproductivity (A(it)). How would one calculate the average annual growth rate of totalfactorprodctivity of each country
1. Country A and B both have the production functionY = F (K, L) = K ½L ½or Y = K0.5 L0.5 a) What is the per-worker production function, y= f (k)? Please make sure to write specificfunctional form of the per-worker production function. b) Assume that neither country experiences population growth nor technological progressand that 4 percent of capital depreciates each year. Assume further that country A saves 24percent of output each year and country B saves 16 percent of output each year. Using youranswer from part a) and the steady-state condition, find the steady-state level of capital perworker for each country. Then find the steady-state levels of income per worker for eachcountry and steady-state level of consumption per worker for each country.
What is the definition of Capital Flight? What are the causes of Capital Flight? How to recovery from Capital Flight? Summarize the Venezuela economy and oil dependency as an example of Capital Flight. Mention another case of an economy as an example of capital flight. Discuss the causes and consequences in that economy, and suggest some policy can help such economies to recover from capital flight phenomena