Consider the example in the table below of three homeowners residing on the banks of a lake. Assume that the lake was cleaned up to the socially efficient level and that the total costs of the cleanup were shared equally among the homeowners (stick to integer values here): Part I. Will all three homeowners be better off? (you have to calculate on your own) All are better off A and B are better off, but C is not B and C are better off but not A Part II. What problems does this bring up about sharing the costs of public goods? Society can be made better off but only on the expense of certain groups Society should not even invest in the cleaning of the lake on the first place Society can never recover public good costs

Consider the example in the table below of three homeowners residing on the banks of a lake. Assume that the lake was cleaned up to the socially efficient level and that the total costs of the cleanup were shared equally among the homeowners (stick to integer values here): Part I. Will all three homeowners be better off? (you have to calculate on your own) All are better off A and B are better off, but C is not B and C are better off but not A Part II. What problems does this bring up about sharing the costs of public goods? Society can be made better off but only on the expense of certain groups Society should not even invest in the cleaning of the lake on the first place Society can never recover public good costs

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter30: Market Failure: Externalities, Public Goods, And Asymmetric Information

Section30.1: Externalies

Problem 2ST

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The graph directly below depicts the production of oil from the Gulf of Mexico, with market demand, MEC, MSC, and MPC all drawn on the figure. The X axis defines barrels of oil pumped from the gulf. A. What area represents net benefits to society at the socially optimal outcome? A. A + B B. A + B + G C. A D. None of the above B. What area represents the loss in net benefits at the privately optimal outcome? A. H B. H + L+ K C. K D. None of the above
Firms A and B each produce 80 units of pollution. The federal government wants to reduce pollution levels. The marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MCA = 50 + 3QA for firm A and MCB = 20 + 6QB for firm B, where QA and QB are the quantities of pollution reduced by each firm. Society’s marginal benefit from pollution reduction is given by MB = 590 – 3Qtot, where Qtot is the total reduction in pollution. Explain how the social optimum can be achieved if firms are given equal numbers of pollution permits but are allowed to trade
Viral infections such as flu are highly contagious. The number of infections and thus the spread of the disease can be prevented by getting vaccinated. However, the decision to take vaccine is voluntary and some people choose not to go for it for various reasons.] [What type of externality occurs by getting vaccinated against contagious diseases? Explain your answer in 100 words or less. [In a diagram, show the market equilibrium quantity of the vaccine. Is the quantity also socially efficient? Explain in 100 words or less and demonstrate using the same diagram. [Suggest one method to achieve a socially efficient outcome. Explain your answer in 100 or less words.
Firms A and B each produce 80 units of pollution. The federal government wants to reduce pollution levels. The marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MCA = 50 + 3QA for firm A and MCB = 20 + 6QB for firm B, where QA and QB are the quantities of pollution reduced by each firm. Society’s marginal benefit from pollution reduction is given by MB = 590 – 3Qtot, where Qtot is the total reduction in pollution. How much total pollution is there in the social optimum?
Why is it socially efficient to set marginal benefits equal to marginal costs rather than abating until total benefits equal total costs?
How can a society reach a socially efficient equilibrium basing it on the Coase Theorem if a vaccine company has a property right? What are a couple of problems suggested by Coase of a private solution if the company has a property right?
Suppose that it costs $300 per day to search for chanterelle mushrooms at Pt. Reyes National Seashore. On an average day, the total weight of mushrooms M found at Pt Reyes is M=100x-x2 pounds where x is the number of people mushroom hunting on that day. Chanterelles can be sold for $80 per pound. How many more people will go mushroom hunting than is socially optimal?
Three roommates, Alan, Billy and Casey, are planning to spend the weekend in their dorm room watching old movies, and they are debating how many to watch. Table below indicates their willingness to pay for each movie: 1st movie 2nd movie 3rd movie 4th movie 5th movie Alan $20 $10 $0 $0 $0 Billy $30 $20 $10 $0 $0 Casey $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 Suppose the steaming fee is $40 per movie. How many movies should the roommates stream to achieve the most efficient outcome? Explain with the help of necessary calculations by utilizing the information in the above table.
Scenario 3 Suppose there are one hundred residents in a neighborhood, and each resident has an identical demand for a public good. The demand for each resident is given by P = 2 - .01Q. If your answer is not a whole number, please make sure to round to the nearest hundredth. Refer to Scenario 3. What is the socially optimal number of the public good if the marginal cost of producing them is $100, $5 and $300?
Illustrate the efficient provision of a public good regarding partial equilibrium analysis.
Suppose that speeding imposes externalities on other people resulting in a social cost of $50. A town is considering hiring an extra police officer to give out speeding tickets. If we want to maximize social welfare (absent enforcement costs), which of the following statements are true? (Assume risk neutral drivers.) What happens to the socially optimal cost of the speeding ticket if the town decides to hire the police officer? a) It goes down b) It goes up c) The amount that it goes down depends on salary of the police officer d) The amount if goes up depends on the salary of the police officer e) None of the above
When the state of Virginia imposed stricter regulations on air pollution in 2003, it also authorized an auction of pollution permits, allowing some plants to emit larger amounts of ozone-depleting chemicals than would otherwise be allowed, and some to emit less. Theory predicts that this auction led to a socially efficient allocation of pollution. Describe how this outcome would occur.