Consider the function d: R² × R² → R$ defined by [min{\32 - x₂, 1} if x₁ = y₁ 1 otherwise, d(x, y) = for x = (x₁, x2), y = (y₁, y2) (That is, for example for x = (1, 2) and y = (2,3), d(x, y) y = (1, 1.5), d(x, y) = 0.5, and for x = = (1,2), y = (1,3), d(x, y) = 1.) = 1, for x = (1, 2) and Is this a well-define metric on R2? Argue for each condition of a metric if it is satisfied and provide a justification or counterexample.

Consider the function d: R² × R² → R$ defined by [min{\32 - x₂, 1} if x₁ = y₁ 1 otherwise, d(x, y) = for x = (x₁, x2), y = (y₁, y2) (That is, for example for x = (1, 2) and y = (2,3), d(x, y) y = (1, 1.5), d(x, y) = 0.5, and for x = = (1,2), y = (1,3), d(x, y) = 1.) = 1, for x = (1, 2) and Is this a well-define metric on R2? Argue for each condition of a metric if it is satisfied and provide a justification or counterexample.

College Algebra

1st Edition

ISBN:9781938168383

Author:Jay Abramson

Publisher:Jay Abramson

Chapter3: Functions

Section3.3: Rates Of Change And Behavior Of Graphs

Problem 2SE: If a functionfis increasing on (a,b) and decreasing on (b,c) , then what can be said about the local...

See similar textbooks