Darnell and Janet are debating the use of coupons by grocery stores. Darnell says, "The use of coupons in grocery stores represents a means of price discrimination. It's pure and simple. Coupons do reduce the price of groceries, but mostly to people who are less likely to buy at the full price." By contrast, Janet contends, "Coupons do not constitute price discrimination. They simply represent a way of temporarily changing the prices of some grocery items. Coupons reduce the price for everyone, not just for those who are price sensitive." Economists generally agree with

Darnell and Janet are debating the use of coupons by grocery stores. Darnell says, "The use of coupons in grocery stores represents a means of price discrimination. It's pure and simple. Coupons do reduce the price of groceries, but mostly to people who are less likely to buy at the full price." By contrast, Janet contends, "Coupons do not constitute price discrimination. They simply represent a way of temporarily changing the prices of some grocery items. Coupons reduce the price for everyone, not just for those who are price sensitive." Economists generally agree with

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter25: Monopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

what are pricing tactics and examples? What are some forms of price discriminations?
Caroline and Frances are debating the pricing strategy of several airlines. Caroline argues, “When airlines restrict discounted tickets to people who book well in advance and stay over on a Saturday, it is not price discrimination, because the restrictions have nothing to do with individual buyers' willingness to pay.” However, Frances says, “The airlines' stay-over restrictions are a form of price discrimination, because they roughly split the market into two separate groups that are willing to pay two different amounts.” Economists generally agree with who?
Explain how price discrimination increases profit.
Use the following roundtable summary on price discrimination from the DOJ and FTC – Roundtable on Price Discrimination - to answer the following questions. a.) What conditions must be met in order for price discrimination to be feasible? What are the factors that determine the competitive implications of price discrimination? b.) Summarize the difference between price discrimination used for “exploitative” purposes vs. “exclusionary” purposes. Explain which – and why – one form is legal but the other is not? c.) Do you think there should be greater government regulations or oversight of firms’ ability to engage in price discrimination? Explain.
What is price discrimination?
List and explain the three kinds of pricing methods. Give an advantage and a disadvantage for each method.
Tara loves to go through the Saturday paper and cut out supermarket coupons. How do you think Tara's coupon-clipping habits apply to the concept of price discrimination?
In 1896, Colgate dental cream was introduced in tubes similar to those we use now. Today, the Colgate-Palmolive Company’s brand of toothpaste is the best-selling toothpaste in the world (ahead of the Crest brand marketed by Procter & Gamble, which was introduced in 1955). While Colgate and Crest enjoy the lion’s share of the toothpaste market, if you view the oral care shelf at your local drugstore or supermarket, you will find over a hundred different varieties of toothpaste. Colgate alone sells over 40 different varieties that are marketed under names ranging from Shrek Bubble Fruit to Colgate Total Advanced Whitening. The high level of product differentiation in the toothpaste market stems from firms introducing new varieties in an attempt to boost their economic profits. In environments where makers of other brands (such as Crest) can easily enter profitable segments of the market, a profitable strategy is to attempt to quickly cover that segment (introducing Shrek Bubble Fruit…
In 1896, Colgate dental cream was introduced in tubes similar to those we use now. Today, the Colgate-Palmolive Company’s brand of toothpaste is the best-selling toothpaste in the world (ahead of the Crest brand marketed by Procter & Gamble, which was introduced in 1955). While Colgate and Crest enjoy the lion’s share of the toothpaste market, if you view the oral care shelf at your local drugstore or supermarket, you will find over a hundred different varieties of toothpaste. Colgate alone sells over 40 different varieties that are marketed under names ranging from Shrek Bubble Fruit to Colgate Total Advanced Whitening. The high level of product differentiation in the toothpaste market stems from firms introducing new varieties in an attempt to boost their economic profits. In environments where makers of other brands (such as Crest) can easily enter profitable segments of the market, a profitable strategy is to attempt to quickly cover that segment (introducing Shrek Bubble…
I stumble on questions like this... Suppose a firm is charging $8 for the first six-pack of cola and $4 for the second six-pack of cola. This firm is using Multiple Choice third-degree price discrimination. first-degree price discrimination. second-degree price discrimination. first-, second- and third-degree price discrimination.
Explain the first degree of the price discrimination in the economy?