Donuts are a big thing in Portland, OR. You go into one of the many donut establishments to purchase some number of these tasty (and even vegan or gluten free if required) treats. Let's say that the first donut has higher utility for you, so you are willing to pay up to $2 for it. For the second donut you are willing to pay $1.50, the third $1, a fourth $0.50 and the fifth $0.00. This particular bakery in Portland charges an average of $i per donut. If you are a rational buyer (which can be hard when faced with so many different delicious donuts) then how many donuts do you purchase, and how much consumer surplus (i.e., money saved compared to what you were willing to spend) do you have? O 4 donuts, $5 O 2 donuts, $5 O 3 donuts, $1.50 O 1 donut, $0.50

Donuts are a big thing in Portland, OR. You go into one of the many donut establishments to purchase some number of these tasty (and even vegan or gluten free if required) treats. Let's say that the first donut has higher utility for you, so you are willing to pay up to $2 for it. For the second donut you are willing to pay $1.50, the third $1, a fourth $0.50 and the fifth $0.00. This particular bakery in Portland charges an average of $i per donut. If you are a rational buyer (which can be hard when faced with so many different delicious donuts) then how many donuts do you purchase, and how much consumer surplus (i.e., money saved compared to what you were willing to spend) do you have? O 4 donuts, $5 O 2 donuts, $5 O 3 donuts, $1.50 O 1 donut, $0.50

Micro Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613064

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter6: Consumer Choice Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3SQP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Jeremy is deeply in love with Jasmine. Jasmine lives where cell phone coverage is poor, so he can either call her on the land-line phone for five cents per minute or he can drive to see her, at a roundâ€”trip cost of 2 in gasoline money. He has a total of 10 per week to spend on staying in touch. To make his preferred choice, Jeremy uses a handy utilimometer that measures his total utility from personal visits and from phone minutes. Using the values in Table 6.6, figure out the points 011 Jeremys consumption choice budget constraint (it may be helpful to do a sketch) and identify his utility-maximizing point.
Praxilla, who lived in ancient Greece, derivesutility from reading poems and from eating cucumbers.Praxilla gets 30 units of marginal utility from her firstpoem, 27 units of marginal utility from her secondpoem, 24 units of marginal utility from her third poem,and so on, with marginal utility declining by three unitsfor each additional poem. Praxilla gets six units ofmarginal utility for each of her first three cucumbersconsumed, five units of marginal utility for each of hernext three cucumbers consumed, four units of marginalutility for each of the following three cucumbersconsumed, and so on, with marginal utility declining byone for every three cucumbers consumed. A poem coststhree bronze coins but a cucumber costs only one bronzecoin. Praxilla has 18 bronze coins. Sketch Praxilla’sbudget set between poems and cucumbers, placingpoems on the vertical axis and cucumbers on thehorizontal axis. Start off with the choice of zero poemsand 18 cucumbers, and calculate the changes in…
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Suppose that now Reese loses almost his entire income, so that he is left with only one dollar, i.e. his new income is I0 = 1. If prices are still px = 2, py = 4, what is his new optimal consumption of x and y (Hint: Remember that consumption of both goods must be weakly positive, i.e. x∗ ≥ 0 and y∗ ≥ 0) (a) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 0(b) x∗ = 0.25, y∗ = 0(c) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0.25(d) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0(e) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 1
John likes Coca-Cola. After consuming one Coke, John has a total utility of 10 utils. After two Cokes, he has a total utility of 25 utils. After three Cokes, he has a total utility of 50 utils. Does John show diminishing marginal utility for Coke, or does he show increasing marginal utility for Coke? Supposethat John has $3 in his pocket. If Cokes cost $1 each and John is willing to spend one of his dollars on purchasing a first can of Coke, would he spend his second dollar on a Coke, too? What about the third dollar? If John’s marginal utility for Coke keeps on increasing no matter how many Cokes he drinks, would it be fair to say that he is addicted to Coke?
1. Does a dollar given to a rich person raise the rich person’s total utility more than a dollar given to a poor person raises the poor person’s total utility? 2. This week you have gone to two parties. Assume the total utility you gained from these parties is 100 utils. Then you go to a third party, and your total utility rises to 110 utils. What is the marginal utility of the third party attended per week? Given the law of diminishing marginal utility, what will happen to total utility and marginal utility when you go to a third party this week? 3. Suppose you consume 3 pounds of beef and 5 pounds of pork per month. The price of beef is $1.50 per pound, and pork is $2.00 per pound. Assuming you have studied economics and achieved consumer equilibrium, what is the ratio of the marginal utility of beef for the marginal utility of pork? 4. Explain the relationship between the law of diminishing marginal utility and the law of demand. 5. Using the marginal utility…
Jeremy is deeply in love with Jasmine. Jasmine lives where cell phone coverage is poor, so he can either callher on the land-line phone for five cents per minute or he can drive to see her, at a round-trip cost of $2 in gasolinemoney. He has a total of $10 per week to spend on staying in touch. To make his preferred choice, Jeremy uses ahandy utilimometer that measures his total utility from personal visits and from phone minutes. Using the values inTable 6.6, figure out the points on Jeremy’s consumption choice budget constraint (it may be helpful to do a sketch)and identify his utility-maximizing point
John likes Coca-Cola. After consuming one Coke, John has a total utility of 10 utils. After two Cokes, he has a total utility of 25 utils. After three Cokes, he has a total utility of 50 utils. Does John show diminishing marginal utility for Coke or does he show increasing marginal utility for Coke? Suppose that John has $3 in his pocket. If Cokes cost $1 each and John is willing to spend one of his dollars on purchasing a first can of Coke, would he spend his second dollar on a Coke, too? What about the third dollar? If John’s marginal utility for Coke keeps on increasing no matter how many Cokes he drinks, would it be fair to say that he is addicted to Coke? *use tables and/or graphs if possible, please original work
The table below shows Martha’s total utility from burgers and pasta. Suppose that the price of a burger is $4, the price of pasta is $8 a dish, and Martha has $24 a week to spend. Quantity of Burger per week Total utility for Burger MU MU/P Quantity of Dishes Pasta per week Total utility for Pasta MU MU/P 0 0 0 0 1 10 1 20 2 18 2 36 3 25 3 48 4 31 4 56 5 36 5 60 6 40 6 62 a- Conclude whether or not we follow the law of diminishing MU. b- What is optimal combination of Burger and Pasta?
4. Kay lives in a city where housing costs $1 per square foot. They have a monthly budget of$1,000, of which they decide to allocate $500 to rent a 500 sqft. apartment and spend teother $500 on consumption. A generous relative offers Kay a deal on a 400 sqft. apartmentfor only $200 per month, which they accept. What is the equivalent variation of this transferfor Kay, in dollars per month? (Select one)(a) More than $300: Kay gets utility from both consumption and the new apartment.(b) $300: That is how much more Kay can consume with the new cost of rent.(c) $250: That is how much less Kay’s old bundle would have cost at the new prices.(d) Between $0 and $250: Kay would substitute away from her old bundle at the new prices.(e) $200: That is the additional cost of Kay’s new bundle at the old prices.(f) Between $0 and $200: Kay may prefer to substitute away from her new bundle at theold prices.(g) $100: That is the differential cost of the new apartment at the old prices.(h) $0: The new…
Jeremy is deeply in love with Jasmine. Jasmine lives where cell phone coverage is poor, so he can either call her on the land-line phone for five cents per minute or he can drive to see her, at a round-trip cost of $2 in gasoline money. He has a total of $10 per week to spend on staying in touch. To make his preferred choice, Jeremy uses a handy utilimometer that measures his total utility from personal visits and from phone minutes. Using the values in Table 6.6,figureoutthepointsonJeremy’sconsumptionchoicebudgetconstraint(itmaybehelpfultodoasketch) and identify his utility-maximizing point. 3. Explain all the reasons why a decrease in a product's price would lead to an increase in purchases. 4. Asacollegestudentyouworkatapart-timejob,butyourparentsalsosendyouamonthly“allowance.” Suppose onemonthyourparentsforgottosendthecheck.Showgraphicallyhowyourbudgetconstraintisaffected.Assuming you only buy normal goods, what would happen to your purchases of goods?
Mylie’s total utility from singing the same song over and over is 50 utils after one repetition, 90 utils after two repetitions, 70 utils after three repetitions, 20 utils after four repetitions, −50 utils after five repetitions, and −200 utils after six repetitions. Write down her marginal utility for each repetition. Once Mylie’s total utility begins to decrease, does each additional singing of the song hurt more than the previous one or less than the previous one?
Alex, who was convinced that "Football is coming home", was very excited for the World Cup last year. Unfortunately, he realized that his favourite Paul Gascoigne jersey from Euro 1996 was getting old, so he wanted to buy a new one before England's first game the following week. He could either buy a 2014 James Milner shirt from retailer A, which would make him totally happy (utility=1), or a 2006 David Beckham shirt from retailer B, which gives him a utility of 0.8. However, the shirts are not available today. There is a 50% chance that retailer A will have the shirt on the week-end, and 70% chance that retailer B will have theirs on the week-end. Due to time and work constraints, Alex can only visit one of these retailers before the tournament starts, otherwise he will have to keep his old 1996 shirt, which gives him a utility of 0.5. He can also ask his friend Nathan to check both places in the morning. But being a Welsh supporter, Nathan will not do it for free and wants some…