Following on from the analysis in the previous questions, an economist comes to the conclusion that the best option for policymakers in order to influence the economy would be to fix the exchange rate, keep control of money supply and allow free movement of capital. Would you agree with such a statement and why?

Following on from the analysis in the previous questions, an economist comes to the conclusion that the best option for policymakers in order to influence the economy would be to fix the exchange rate, keep control of money supply and allow free movement of capital. Would you agree with such a statement and why?

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter6: Managing In The Global Economy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Does an expectation of a stronger exchange rate in the future affect the exchange rate in the present? If so, how?
Using the Mundell-Fleming model, explain whether you think a country should pursue an expansionary monetary policy whilst at the same time fixing its exchange rate.
What are the goals of monetary policy? What are the monetary policy targets? Which target is currently utilized by the Fed? Why doesn’t the Fed use the other one? If American demand for purchases of British goods has decreased, how would you expect the equilibrium exchange rate in the market for dollars to respond?
Suppose the Bank of Canada contracts the money supply in an effort to reduce aggregate demand by a particular amount, say $10 billion. If Canada was a closed economy, would the amount by which the Bank of Canada would need to reduce the supply of money to accomplish this goal be greater or smaller than the amount it would need to reduce the supply of money if Canada was a small open economy with a flexible exchange rate?
In the context of the monetary approach to the determination of the exchange rate, what is the effect on the price level, interest rate and exchange rate from a permanent contraction in the domestic growth of the money supply? How do your answer modify if we drop the assumption of PPP?
How is it necessary for a nation with a fixed exchange rate and open financial markets to renounce its independence in terms of monetary policy?
According to the Impossible Trinity, if a country decides to make its currency freely floating, what sacrifice in terms of monetary/exchange rate policy will the country have to make? Question 21 options: Give up monetary independence Give up the use of interest rates as a policy instrument Give up exchange rate stability Give up free capital mobility
Use the Mundell-Fleming model to graphically illustrate and predict what would happen to GDP, the exchange rate, and the money supply under fixed exchange rates when the stock market booms
Does the level of the exchange rate matter in the long run? Why or why not?
Explain why a country with fixed exchange rate and open financial markets has to give up its monetary policy independence?
The autonomous region of Catalonia has recently declared independence from Spain, and is looking for an exchange rate policy that would best fit their needs. The Catalans’ main goal is to stabilise the price level in the long-run, but constantly experience fluctuations in the price of foreign goods imported from Spain and other European countries. Would it be better for the Catalans to fix the exchange rate against the Euro, or to adopt a floating exchange rate? Justify your answer briefly.
Is expansive monetary policy possible, if a country has a floating exchange rate?