Grain Size Analysis Problem Set No. 3 Sieve Analysis Results Hydrometer Analysis Results Mass of soil retained on U.S. Time Diameter % finer by weight sieve (min) (mm) 3. Sieve analysis and hydrometer analysis were performed on a 550 g sample of soil the following results were obtained. Plot the particle size distribution curve for the soil. each sieve (g) no. 0.0396 82.2 4. 2 0.0285 68.8 10 14.8 3 0.0243 64.2 20 98 0.0214 59.7 40 90.1 0.0156 53.1 100 181.9 15 0.0116 48.4 200 108.8 30 0.0083 43.9 PAN 56.1 60 0.006 39.5 240 0.0031 30.0 900 0.0017 22.9

Grain Size Analysis Problem Set No. 3 Sieve Analysis Results Hydrometer Analysis Results Mass of soil retained on U.S. Time Diameter % finer by weight sieve (min) (mm) 3. Sieve analysis and hydrometer analysis were performed on a 550 g sample of soil the following results were obtained. Plot the particle size distribution curve for the soil. each sieve (g) no. 0.0396 82.2 4. 2 0.0285 68.8 10 14.8 3 0.0243 64.2 20 98 0.0214 59.7 40 90.1 0.0156 53.1 100 181.9 15 0.0116 48.4 200 108.8 30 0.0083 43.9 PAN 56.1 60 0.006 39.5 240 0.0031 30.0 900 0.0017 22.9

Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap Course List)

9th Edition

ISBN:9781305970939

Author:Braja M. Das, Khaled Sobhan

Publisher:Braja M. Das, Khaled Sobhan

Chapter2: Origin Of Soil And Grain Size

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2.6P: Repeat Problem 2.4 with the following data. 2.4 The following are the results of a sieve analysis....

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The following are the results of a sieve and hydrometer analysis. Draw the grain -size distribution curve Determine the percentages of gravel, sand silt and clay. UC, CC and S Classify the soil according to USDA. Classify the soil according to ASHTOO. X=1.6 y=2.8
The given data shows a sieve analysis of a soil sample. Classify the soil using AASHTO Method. Tables are provided below. Sieve No. Diameter (mm) Percent Passing No. 4 4.760 73 No. 8 2.380 55 No. 10 2.000 49 No. 20 0.840 48 No. 40 0.420 45 No. 60 0.250 36 No. 100 0.150 29 No. 200 0.075 24 Characteristics of No. 40 Fraction LL -- PL -- A. A-2-4(0) B. A-3(0) C. A-2-5(0) D. A-1-a(0) E. A-1-b(0)
Q 05: (CLO 3) For a given soil, the following are given in Table: Specific Gravity Gs, bulk unit weight γ), and moisture content (w). Use data from the table according to your registration number. (You can solve answer on paper and paste neat clear image in the answer). Student Registration Number Gs γ (kN/m3) moisture content (w) % 102 2.72 17.2 20 Determine: Dry unit weight Void ratio Porosity Degree of saturation
The results of the particle-size analysis of the soil are as follows: Percent passing No. 10 sieve = 100; Percent passing No. 40 sieve = 80; Percent passing No. 10 sieve = 58.The LL and PI of minus No. 40 fraction of the soil are 30 and 10 respectively. Classify the soil by USCS system a. CH b. SP-SC c. CL-ML d. CL-ML
arrow_forward Question A fine-grained soil has 60% clay with LL 220%, PL 545%, and a natural water content of 6%. A standard Proctor test was carried out in the laboratory and the following data were recorded Diameter of mold = 101.40 mmHeight of mold = 116.70 mmMass of mold = 4196.50 gramSpecific gravity, Gs = 2.69 a) Determine the maximum dry unit weight and optimum water content.b) If the desired compaction in the field is 95% of the standard Proctor test results, what values of dry unit weight and water content would you specify?c) Explain why you select these values.d) What field equipment would you specify to compact the soil in the field, and why?e) How would you check that the specified dry unit weight and water content are achieved in the field? I Need The Answer of part (d) and (e)...
From the results of sieve analysis and the grain size curves for soil 1 and siol 2 A. Compute the value of uiformity coefficient Cu. B. Classify Soil No.1 using USCS method C. Classify Soil No.2 using USCS method SIEVE ANALYSIS SIEVE NUMBER DIAMETER mm. PERCENT PASSNG % SOIL 1 SOIL 2 4 4.760 100 90 8 2.380 99 64 10 2.000 98 58 20 0.850 92 35 40 0.425 70 22 60 0.250 46 15 100 0.150 25 10 200 0.074 0 4
41.) The given data shows a sieve analysis of a soil sample. Classify the soil using AASHTO Method. Tables are provided below. Sieve No. Diameter (mm) Percent Passing No. 4 4.760 96 No. 8 2.380 80 No. 10 2.000 78 No. 20 0.840 61 No. 40 0.420 56 No. 60 0.250 48 No. 100 0.150 39 No. 200 0.075 33 Characteristics of No. 40 Fraction LL 37 PL 25 A. A-2-4(0) B. None of these. C. A-2-5(0) D. A-2-6(0) E. A-2-7(0)
Q 03: (a) Draw graph (using graph paper or excel) for soil 1 and 2 given in problem 2 and paste it in the following?(b) Calculate D10 D30 and D60 for Sieve Analysis plot in section (a) and calculate Coefficient of Uniformity and Coefficient of curvature for both soils. Also comment if the soils are well graded or poorly graded and which soil is better graded in comparing to other in case of soil 1 and 2.
A 500g (assume no wastes) of dry soil was used for a soil mechanical analysis. Themass of soil retained in each sieve, and hydrometer analysis data are given in Table 1and Table 2, respectively.Table 1. Sieve Analysis DataUS SieveDiameter Mass Ret., g2.00 mm 101.40 mm 20500 μm 135150 μm 60250 μm 145850 μm 6075 μm 45 Particle PercentDiameter Passing, %20 μm 2.510 μm 1.52 μm 11. What is the value of the percent passing for sieve with 2 mm. opening inpercentage?2.What is the value of the percent passing for sieve with 150 μm. opening inpercentage?3.What is the value of the coefficient of uniformity?4.What are the percentages of gravel, sand, and Fines using the limits indicated byUSCS?5.What are the percentages of gravel,…
The following results were obtained by a mechanical sieve analysis. classify the soil using the Unified Soil Classification System. Sieve analysis % passing by weight is as follows: No.4 = 100% No. 40 = 70% No.200 = 30% Liquid Limit= 33 Plastic Limit = 12
Repeat Problem 2.4 with the following data. 2.4 The following are the results of a sieve analysis. a. Determine the percent finer than each sieve and plot a grain-size distribution curve. b. Determine D10, D30, and D60 for each soil. c. Calculate the uniformity coefficient Cu. d. Calculate the coefficient of gradation Cc.
Repeat Problem 2.8 using the following data. 2.8 The following are the results of a sieve and hydrometer analysis. a. Draw the grain-size distribution curve. b. Determine the percentages of gravel, sand, silt and clay according to the MIT system. c. Repeat Part b according to the USDA system. d. Repeat Part b according to the AASHTO system.