Henry and Wilma, an elderly immigrant couple, agreed to purchase from Brown a refrigerator with fair market value of $450 for twenty-five monthly installments of $60.00 per month. Henry and Wilma now wish to void the contract, asserting that they did not realize the exor- bitant price they were paying. Result?

Henry and Wilma, an elderly immigrant couple, agreed to purchase from Brown a refrigerator with fair market value of $450 for twenty-five monthly installments of $60.00 per month. Henry and Wilma now wish to void the contract, asserting that they did not realize the exor- bitant price they were paying. Result?

SWFT Individual Income Taxes

43rd Edition

ISBN:9780357391365

Author:YOUNG

Publisher:YOUNG

Chapter14: Property Transactions: Determination Of Gain Or Loss And Basis Considerations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 19CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which of the following will result in the recognition of gross income? Gail's employer allows her to set aside $ 4,000 from her wages to cover the cost of daycare for Gail's four-year-old daughter. Gail's daycare costs are $ 4,300 for the year. Hannah purchases a new sofa from her employer, Sofas-R-Us, for $ 1,200. The cost of the sofa to the furniture store is $ 1,100 and the sofa normally sells for $ 1,700. Jayden's employer purchases her commuting pass for the subway at a cost of $ 225 per month. Havana is a lawyer. The law firm she works for pays for her subscription to Lawyer's Weekly, a trade magazine for attorneys. None of the above will result in recognition of gross income.
Charles wants to renovate the bathroom and kitchen in his home, and he hires Veronica to do this work. They enter into a contract after agreeing to a cost of $40,000. However, once Veronica starts work, she realizes that it will cost $15,000 extra to complete the work that she promised. To show good faith to Charles, Veronica tells him that she will split the added cost with Charles and asks Charles for an additional $7,500. Charles refuses to pay the additional $7,500, and Veronica threatens to stop work on the renovation. After fearing that another contractor will probably charge much more, Charles calls Veronica and tells her he’ll pay the additional $7,500. After the renovations are completed, Charles refuses to pay the additional $7,500, despite agreeing to it. Veronica sues Charles. Who wins? Please explain.
Aki offered to sell her house and lot to Jannie for P2,000,000 who was interested in buying the same. In her letter, Aki stated that she was giving Jannie a period of one month within which to raise the amount. A week before the expiration of the period, Aki told Jannie that she is no longer willing to sell the property unless the price is increased to P3,000,000. May Jannie compel Aki to accept the P2,000,000 first offered? No, because the increase in the price is 50% and is deemed iniquitous and unconscionable. Yes, the period is deemed for the benefit of Darleane as it was Tin who voluntarily offered the period to her No, because the promise to sell had no cause or consideration distinct from the selling price Yes, because this is an obligation with a period intended for the benefit of both parties
Fred currently earns $10,400 per month. Fred has been offered the chance to transfer for three to five years to an overseas affiliate. His employer is willing to pay Fred $11,400 per month if he accepts the assignment. Assume that the maximum foreign-earned income exclusion for next year is $112,000. - If Fred’s employer also provided him free housing abroad (cost of $21,400), how much of the $21,400 is excludable from Fred’s income?
Daniel agreed that he would erect an apartment building for Steven for $12 million and that Daniel would suffer a deduction of $12,000 per day for every day of delay. Daniel was twenty days late in finishing the job, losing ten days because of a strike and ten days because the material suppliers were late in furnishing materials. Daniel claims that he is entitled to payment in full (a) because the agreement as to $12,000 a day is a penalty and (b) because Steven has not shown that he has sustained any damage. Discuss each contention and decide.
Landlord leased her suburban ice cream parlor for three years at a rent of $2000 a month toBaskin. Six months later, Baskin transferred his interest in the lease to Herrell. One year later,Herrell transferred his interest in the lease to Ana. Now, none of the parties is paying the rent.Landlord wants to sue Herrell for the rent, "because he is the only one who can probably paythe rent that is due." In order to sue Herrell for the remaining rent, Landlady will have to prove:a-That the transfers from Baskin to Herrell, and from Herrell to Ana, both conveyed the fullremaining interest in the leasehold. b-That the transfer from Baskin to Herrell conveyed the full remaining interest in the lease leasehold, but the transfer from Herrell to Ana conveyed less than the full remaining interest in thec-That the transfer from Baskin to Herrell conveyed less than the full remaining interest in the leasehold, but the transfer from Herrell to Ana conveyed the full remaining interest in the lease. d-…
They are considering trading their car in for a newer used vehicle so that Harry can have dependable transportation for commuting to work. The couple still owes $4,770 to the credit union for their current car, or $265 per month for the remaining 18 months of the 48-month loan. The trade-in value of this car plus $1,000 that Harry earned from a freelance interior design job should allow the couple to pay off the auto loan and leave $1,400 for a down payment on the newer car. The Johnsons have agreed on a sales price for the newer car of $23,000. The money planned for tires will be spent for other incidental taxes and fees associated with the purchase. 1. Using the Garman/Forgue companion website or the information in Table 7-2, calculate the monthly payment for a loan period of three, four, five, and six years at 8 percent APR. Round your answers to the nearest cent. Round Monthly Installment Payment for a Loan in intermediate calculations to the nearest cent.
Riley Company promises to pay Janet Anderson or her estate $150,000 per year for the next 10 years, even if she leaves the company or passes away to try to induce her to stay with the company. Riley Company wants to properly record this transaction as deferred compensation. Riley Company purchased a whole life insurance policy for Janet, naming the company as the beneficiary. Reed Company wants to determine if it can offset the cash surrender value of the life insurance policy against the deferred compensation liability.
As a result of their divorce, Eric agreed to pay alimony to Tammy of $20,000 per year. The payments are to cease in the event of Fric's or Tammy's death or in the event of Tammy's remarriage. The alimony is not tied to their daughter with any conditions. In addition, Tammy is to receive their residence, which cost them $100,000 but is worth $140,000. a) How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Eric and Tammy if the divorce was finalized in 2018? b) How will the $ 20,000 payments be treated by Eric and Tammy if the divorce was finalized in 2019? c) Assume the alimony was tied to a condition surrounding their daughter. This condition states that once their daughter turns 18, the payments to Tammy drop by $12,000 per year. If all other conditions surrounding the payments remain true, how would the payments be treated assuming their divorce was finalized in 2018? In 2019?
Today, Jim entered into an agreement to sell his cottage to Sara for $150,000. Unknown to both Jim and Sara, the cottage was destroyed because of the storm. a. What happens to this contract and. What determines the outcome of this case?
Mr. Anthony orally agreed to sell his refrigerator for P10,000 to Ms. Johnson who made a partial payment of P4,000. Later, Mr. Anthony denied there was such a sale. Can Ms. Johnson enforce the sale considering that the contract was oral and the price was more than P 500? Explain.
Rebecca entered into a written contract to sell certain real estate to Mary, a minor, for $80,000, payable $4,000 on the execution of the contract and $800 on the first day of each month thereafter until paid. Mary paid the $4,000 down payment and eight monthly installments before attaining her majority. Thereafter, Mary made two additional monthly payments and caused the contract to be recorded in the county where the real estate was located. Mary was then advised by her attorney that the contract was voidable. After being so advised, Mary immediately tendered the contract to Rebecca, together with a deed reconveying all of Mary’s interest in the property to Rebecca. Also, Mary demanded that Rebecca return the money she had paid under the contract. Rebecca refused the tender and declined to repay any portion of the money paid to her by Mary. Can Mary cancel the contract and recover the amount paid to Rebecca? Explain.