Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Probability
Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and disagrees with them, arguing that happy people tend to listen to more prosocial music than unhappy people, and they also tend to be more cooperative. How might Greitemeyer respond to this criticism? O a. You're right, I hadn't considered this alternative explanation. O b. You're right, correlation is not causation. O c. Because I manipulated the IV, I ruled out this alternative explanation. O d. Because I randomized participants to condition, I ruled out this alternative explanation.

Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and disagrees with them, arguing that happy people tend to listen to more prosocial music than unhappy people, and they also tend to be more cooperative. How might Greitemeyer respond to this criticism? O a. You're right, I hadn't considered this alternative explanation. O b. You're right, correlation is not causation. O c. Because I manipulated the IV, I ruled out this alternative explanation. O d. Because I randomized participants to condition, I ruled out this alternative explanation.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 13PT
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
A1
The following is a description of a study that was not assigned in class. Your job is to interpret the main results of this study, which are provided here. An experimental study by Greitemeyer (2009) examined the effects of listening to prosocial music on cooperative behavior. He randomly assigned participants to listen to prosocial songs or neutral songs, and then assessed how cooperative they were using a modified Tangram task. He was also interested in two types of responses to this music: empathy (an emotional response) and prosocial thoughts (a cognitive response) The image below summarizes his results. Use this image to answer questions 15-20: B = .48, p< .01 B= .37, p< .05 %D Empathy Type of song Cooperative behavior Accessibility of prosocial thoughts B= .09, p= .56 B= .37, p< .05 Note: For "Type of Song", positive B means that the prosocial condition scor d higher than the neutral condition; negative B means that the prosocial condition scored lower than the neutral condition.
Transcribed Image Text:The following is a description of a study that was not assigned in class. Your job is to interpret the main results of this study, which are provided here. An experimental study by Greitemeyer (2009) examined the effects of listening to prosocial music on cooperative behavior. He randomly assigned participants to listen to prosocial songs or neutral songs, and then assessed how cooperative they were using a modified Tangram task. He was also interested in two types of responses to this music: empathy (an emotional response) and prosocial thoughts (a cognitive response) The image below summarizes his results. Use this image to answer questions 15-20: B = .48, p< .01 B= .37, p< .05 %D Empathy Type of song Cooperative behavior Accessibility of prosocial thoughts B= .09, p= .56 B= .37, p< .05 Note: For "Type of Song", positive B means that the prosocial condition scor d higher than the neutral condition; negative B means that the prosocial condition scored lower than the neutral condition.
Question 19 Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and disagrees with them, arguing that happy people tend to listen to more prosocial music than unhappy people, and they also tend to be more cooperative. How might Greitemeyer respond to this criticism? O a. You're right, I hadn't considered this alternative explanation. b. You're right, correlation is not causation. O c. Because I manipulated the IV, I ruled out this alternative explanation. O d. Because I randomized participants to condition, I ruled out this alternative explanation. Question 2O Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and remains unconinced by the measure of cooperative behavior. She does not think that a "modified Tangram task" approximates any form of real cooperative behavior that people care about in everyday life. This researcher is questioning the of this study. O a. internal validity O b. external validity O c. IV manipulation O d. statistical significance
Transcribed Image Text:Question 19 Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and disagrees with them, arguing that happy people tend to listen to more prosocial music than unhappy people, and they also tend to be more cooperative. How might Greitemeyer respond to this criticism? O a. You're right, I hadn't considered this alternative explanation. b. You're right, correlation is not causation. O c. Because I manipulated the IV, I ruled out this alternative explanation. O d. Because I randomized participants to condition, I ruled out this alternative explanation. Question 2O Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and remains unconinced by the measure of cooperative behavior. She does not think that a "modified Tangram task" approximates any form of real cooperative behavior that people care about in everyday life. This researcher is questioning the of this study. O a. internal validity O b. external validity O c. IV manipulation O d. statistical significance
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS