Imagine that a researcher appropiately rejects a null hypothesis (with that null hypothesis stating that there is no difference between two means in the population). What is an appropiate interpretation for the rejection of the null hypothesis on the basis of the hypothesis test and the corresponding statistics? a. The observed differences between means were due to sampling error. b. The probability of obtaining the observed difference between means (or an even more extreme difference) is very unlikely. c. The probability of obtaining the observed difference between means (or an even more extreme difference) is very unlikely, given that the null hypothesis is false. d. The probability of obtaining the observed difference between means (or an even more extreme difference) is very unlikely, given that the null hypothesis is true. e. None of the above
Imagine that a researcher appropiately rejects a null hypothesis (with that null hypothesis stating that there is no difference between two means in the population). What is an appropiate interpretation for the rejection of the null hypothesis on the basis of the hypothesis test and the corresponding statistics?
a. The observed differences between means were due to sampling error.
b. The probability of obtaining the observed difference between means (or an even more extreme difference) is very unlikely.
c. The probability of obtaining the observed difference between means (or an even more extreme difference) is very unlikely, given that the null hypothesis is false.
d. The probability of obtaining the observed difference between means (or an even more extreme difference) is very unlikely, given that the null hypothesis is true.
e. None of the above
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
