Imagine that you are a financial investor and Boyan Slat of Ocean Clean-up. Comes to you for an investment in his project to filter plastic remains from the world oceans. He presents that his project only requires $20 million in funding; that it will help to reduce damage to the delicate eco-systems of the world oceans and that the reduction of this damage would avoid an otherwise necessary clean-up cost $2 billion in expenses. Therefore, he argues, the investment offers a return of 1000%. Would you invest? Why/why not?

Imagine that you are a financial investor and Boyan Slat of Ocean Clean-up. Comes to you for an investment in his project to filter plastic remains from the world oceans. He presents that his project only requires $20 million in funding; that it will help to reduce damage to the delicate eco-systems of the world oceans and that the reduction of this damage would avoid an otherwise necessary clean-up cost $2 billion in expenses. Therefore, he argues, the investment offers a return of 1000%. Would you invest? Why/why not?

Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Series)

4th Edition

ISBN:9781305970663

Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Publisher:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Chapter19: Capital Investment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 28P: Friedman Company is considering installing a new IT system. The cost of the new system is estimated...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal, but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would cost $240 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $80 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $84 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk-adjusted WACC is 17%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation. b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation? Why or why not?
Environmentally conscious companies are looking for ways to be less damaging to the environment while saving money with innovative investments in capital equipment. DuPont is sponsoring a project to recover much of the energy presently being lost in the primary stage of one of their chemical reactor vessels. Three mutually exclusive designs are being considered for implementation. The estimated capital requirements and annual savings in operating expenses are given below. Assume aMARR = 15% per year, and the study period is 6 years. Salvage values of the three designs are negligible. Which design should be selected?
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $269.87 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $90 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $93.62 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 16%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $269.75 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $90 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $93.85 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 17%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…
Oil from a particular type of marine microalgae can be converted to biodiesel that can serve as an alternate transportable fuel for automobiles and trucks. If lined ponds are used to grow the algae, the construction cost will be $13 million and the maintenance & operating (M&O) cost will be $2.1 million per year. If long plastic tubes are used for growing the algae, the initial cost will be higher at $18 million, but less contamination will render the M&O cost lower at $0.41 million per year. At an interest rate of 10% per year and a 5-year project period, which system is better, ponds or tubes? Use a present worth analysis.
Oil from a specific type of marine microalgae can be converted into biodiesel that may serve as an alternate transportable fuel for automobiles and trucks. If lined ponds are used to grow the algae, the construction cost is $12 million and the M&O cost is estimated at $1.6 million per year. Alternatively, if long plastic tubes are used for growing the algae, the initial cost will be higher at $16 million, but less contamination will render the M&O cost lower at $0.4 million per year. At an interest rate of 10% per year and a 5-year project period, which system is better—ponds or tubes? Use a present worth analysis. The present worth of lined ponds is $ ____million and that of plastic tubes is $ ____million. ____ (Lined ponds or plastic tubes) are used to grow algae.
I have a question about some calculations that I have done for the question below. Pharmos Incorporated is a Pharmaceutical Company which is considering investing in a new production line of portable electrocardiogram (ECG) machines for its clients who suffer from cardio vascular diseases. The company has to invest in equipment which cost $2,500,000 and falls within a MARCS depreciation of 5-years, and is expected to have a scrape value of $200,000 at the end of the project. Other than the equipment, the company needs to increase its cash and cash equivalents by $100,000, increase the level of inventory by $30,000, increase accounts receivable by $250,000 and increase account payable by $50,000 at the beginning of the project. Pharmos Incorporated expect the project to have a life of five years. The company would have to pay for transportation and installation of the equipment which has an invoice price of $450,000.The company has already invested $75,000 in Research and Development…
Oil from a specific type of marine microalgae can be converted into biodiesel that may serve as an al- ternate transportable fuel for automobiles and trucks. If lined ponds are used to grow the algae, the construction cost is $13 million and the M&O cost is estimated at $2.1 million per year. Alterna- tively, if long plastic tubes are used for growing the algae, the initial cost will be higher at $18 million, but less contamination will render the M&O cost lower at $0.41 million per year. At an interest rate of 10% per year and a 5-year project period, which system is better—ponds or tubes? Use a present worth analysis.
A Builder company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted weighted average cost of capital is 12%. Calculate the Net Present Value and IRR with and without mitigation. Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?
A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing an additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation. Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?
Dwight Donovan, the president of Fanning Enterprises, is considering two investment opportunities. Because of limited resources, he will be able to invest in only one of them. Project A is to purchase a machine that will enable factory automation; the machine is expected to have a useful life of four years and no salvage value. Project B supports a training program that will improve the skills of employees operating the current equipment. Initial cash expenditures for Project A are $116,000 and for Project B are $36,000. The annual expected cash inflows are $44,810 for Project A and $12,355 for Project B. Both investments are expected to provide cash flow benefits for the next four years. Fanning Enterprises’ desired rate of return is 8 percent.
Dwight Donovan, the president of Perez Enterprises, is considering two investment opportunities. Because of limited resources, he will be able to invest in only one of them. Project A is to purchase a machine that will enable factory automation; the machine is expected to have a useful life of five years and no salvage value. Project B supports a training program that will improve the skills of employees operating the current equipment. Initial cash expenditures for Project A are $103,000 and for Project B are $48,000. The annual expected cash inflows are $26,481 for Project A and $13,982 for Project B. Both investments are expected to provide cash flow benefits for the next five years. Perez Enterprises’ desired rate of return is 8 percent. (PV of $1 and PVA of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.)Required Compute the net present value of each project. Which project should be adopted based on the net present value approach? Compute the approximate internal rate…