-Individuals 1 and 2 are forming a company. The value of their relationship depends on the effort thateach expends. Suppose that individual i's utility from the relationship is x² + x; − xixj, where x¿is individual i 's effort and x ; is the effort of the other person (i = 1, 2). Assume x1, x2 ≥ 0. Whichstatement is true?There is a Nash equilibrium in which each player chooses effort level k > 0. This equilibrium isPareto efficient.There is no mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium.There is a unique Nash equilibrium in which each player chooses no effort x¿ = x; = 0.The set of Nash equilibria in this game is finite.There is a Nash equilibrium in which xi= 0 and x ; = 1|=

Statement that is true: There is a unique Nash equilibrium in which each player chooses no effort…

Answered: - Individuals 1 and 2 are forming a…

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.12P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Rachel, Monica, and Phoebe are roommates; each has 10 hours of free time you could spend cleaning your apartment. You all dislike cleaning, but you all like having a clean apartment: each person’s payoff is the total hours spent (by everyone) cleaning, minus a number 1/2 times the hours spent (individually) cleaning.That is, ui(s1, s2, s3) = s1 + s2 + s3 -1/2si Assume everyone chooses simultaneously how much time to spend cleaning. a. Find the Nash equilibrium. b. Find the Nash if the payoff for each player is: ui(s1, s2, s3) = s1 + s2 + s3 − 3si Is the Nash equilibrium Pareto efficient? If not, can you find an outcome in which everyone is better off than in the Nash equilibrium outcome?
Within a voluntary contribution game, the Nash equilibrium level of contribution is zero, but in experiments, it is often possible to sustain positive levels of contribution for a long period. How might we best explain this? A) Participants are altruistic, and so value the payoff which other participants receive, benefiting (indirectly) from making a contribution. B) Participants believe that if they make a contribution, then other participants will be more likely to make a contribution. C) Participants in experiments believe that they have to make contributions in order to receive any payoff from their participation. D) Participants have experience of working in situations in which cooperation can be sustained for mutual benefit and so have internalised a social norm of cooperation
Suppose two bidders compete for a single indivisible item (e.g., a used car, a piece of art, etc.). We assume that bidder 1 values the item at $v1, and bidder 2 values the item at $v2. We assume that v1 > v2. In this problem we study a second price auction, which proceeds as follows. Each player i = 1, 2 simultaneously chooses a bid bi ≥ 0. The higher of the two bidders wins, and pays the second highest bid (in this case, the other player’s bid). In case of a tie, suppose the item goes to bidder 1. If a bidder does not win, their payoff is zero; if the bidder wins, their payoff is their value minus the second highest bid. a) Now suppose that player 1 bids b1 = v2 and player 2 bids b2 = v1, i.e., they both bid the value of the other player. (Note that in this case, player 2 is bidding above their value!) Show that this is a pure NE of the second price auction. (Note that in this pure NE the player with the lower value wins, while in the weak dominant strategy equilibrium where both…
At a company, 20 employees are making contributions for a retirement gift.Each person is choosing how many dollars to contribute from the interval[0,10]. The payoff to person i is bi X xi - xi, where bi > 0 is the “warm glow”he receives from each dollar he contributes, and he incurs a personal cost of 1.a. Assume bi < 1 for all i. Find all Nash equilibria. How much is collected?b. Assume bi > 1 for all i. Find all Nash equilibria. How much is collected?c. Assume bi = 1 for all i. Find all Nash equilibria. How much is collected?Now suppose the manager of these 20 employees has announced that shewill contribute d > 0 dollars for each dollar that an employee contributes.The warm glow effect to employee i from contributing a dollar is now bi X(1 + d) because each dollar contributed actually results in a total contribution of 1 + d. Assume bi = 0.1 for i = 1, . . . , 5; bi = 0.2 for i = 6, . . . , 10; bi = 0.25 for i = 11, . . . , 15; and bi = 0.5 for i = 16, . . . , 20.d. What…
The prisoner illustrates that rational, self-interested individuals will natuarally avoid the Nash equilibrium, because it is worse for both of them, true or false and why ?
Consider the game of Chicken in which each player has the option to “get out of the way” and “hang tough” with payoffs: Get out of the way Hang tough Get out of the way 2,2 1,3 Hang tough 3,1 00 a. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria, if they exist b. Let k be the probability that player 1 chooses “hang tough” and u be the probability that player two chooses “hang tough.” Find the mixed stragety Nash equilibria, if they exist
Jacob wants to rent out car from James. Jacob has a big passion for cars and enjoys speeding, so much that he often gets fined. Jacob receives £400 in utility from being able to speed on the road whereas James would like to avoid getting fined. If Jacob spreads don the road, it will cost James £700. Thus, James is considering charging Jacob a fine deposit of £700. a) Draw the extensive form of this principal-agent problem and use backward induction to solve for the Nash Equilibrium. b) Explain why this situation could be considered a principal-agent problem
Two players bargain over 1 unit of a divisible object. Bargaining starts with an offer of player 1, which player 2 either accepts or rejects. If player 2 rejects, then player 1 makes another offer; if player 2 rejects once more, then player 2 makes an offer. If player 1 rejects the offer of player 2, then once more it is the turn of player 1 where he makes two consecutive offers. As long as an agreement has not been reached this procedure continues. For example, suppose that agreement is reached at period 5, it follows that player 1 makes offers in period 1,2 then player 2 makes an o er in period 3, then player 1 makes offers in 4,5. Negotiations can continue indefinitely, agreement in period 't' with a division (x, 1- x) leads to payoffs ( , (1-x)).(The difference from Rubinstein's alternating offer bargaining is that player one makes two consecutive offers, whereas player 2 makes a single offer in her turn.) a. Show that there is a subgame perfect equilibrium in which player 2's…
Two neighboring homeowners, i = 1,2, simultaneously choose how many hours to spend maintaining a lawn. The AVERAGE benefit per hour for i is (e.g., it is for homeowner 1) And the (opportunity) cost per hour for each homeowner is 4. (a) Give each homeowner’s (net) payoff as a function of and . (b) Compute the Nash equilibrium.
Our classroom needs a better webcam. A webcam benefits everyone and I am soliciting donations from the class. There are N students, and each student possesses a token. A webcam costs K tokens. K is greater than 2, but less than N. Now, the action of each student is to either donate a token or avoid me. Find the Nash equilibrium/equilibria. Give an answer with reasoning.
Consider the charity auction. In many charity auctions, altruistic celebrities auction objects with special value for their fans to raise funds for charity. Madonna, for example, held an auction to sell clothing worn during her career and raised about 3.2 million dollars. In the charity auction the winner of the lot is the highest bidder. The difference with the standard auction is that all bidders are required to pay an amount equal to what they bid. Suppose there are two bidders and assume bidders have valuations randomly drawn from the interval [2, 4] according to the uniform distribution. 1. Derive the equilibrium bidding function. Hint: After getting the differential equation given by the FOC, propose a non-linear bidding function b(v) = α + βv2 as solution. Your task is to find α and β. 2. Derive the revenue of the seller in the charity auction. 3. Would the seller obtain higher profits if she organized a first-price sealed bid auction instead? A. Yes, higher revenue B. No, lower…
You have just played rock, paper, scissors with your friend. You chose scissors and he chose paper, so you won. Is this a Nash equilibrium? Explain why or why not.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS