e. The p-value is ? O af. Based on this, we should Select an answerthe nullhypothesis.g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The results are statistically insignificant at a =0.01, so there is insufficient evidence toconclude that the population proportion ofwildfires caused by humans in the south is higherthan the population proportion of wildfirescaused by humans in the west.The results are statistically significant at a =0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the proportion of the 526 wildfires thatwere caused by humans in the south is higherthan the proportion of the 594 wildfires thatwere caused by humans in the west.The results are statistically insignificant at a =0.01, so there is statistically significant evidenceto conclude that the population proportion ofwildfires caused by humans in the south is equalto the population proportion of wildfires causedby humans in the west.The results are statistically significant at a =0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the population proportion of wildfirescaused by humans in the south is higher than thepopulation proportion of wildfires caused byhumans in the west. Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the southhigher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans inthe west? 367 of the 526 randomly selected wildfires lookedat in the south were caused by humans while 390 of the 594randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were causedby humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level ofsignificance?

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/0a5c2423-0fc0-47a8-91f7-58fe7e87d251.jpg

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 367 of the 526 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 390 of the 594 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? %3D

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 367 of the 526 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 390 of the 594 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? %3D

Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012

1st Edition

ISBN:9780547587776

Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL

Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL

Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8CR

See similar textbooks