lamc aS CHreeUII me taUle. USe the mUNmatioII givell, tU TIIIISI1 he questions DeIow. 1) The table following provides you total utility (U) and marginal (MU) from consuming Salmon and Lobster. Suppose your total utility of Salmon consumption (U1) is a function of units (Q as pound or lbs.) of salmon consumed, as U1 = 400Q. Similarly, your total utility Lobster (U2) has the form as units (Q as lbs.) of lobster consumed, which is U2 = /36Q + 4- Now fill the empty spots in the table using the information given. Total utility and marginal utility of Salmon and Lobster. Copper River Salmon Atlantic Lobster Q (lbs.) U1 MU1 U2 MU2 1 20.00 20.00 8.72 8.72 4 8. 9. 10 both Salmon and Lobsters. To

lamc aS CHreeUII me taUle. USe the mUNmatioII givell, tU TIIIISI1 he questions DeIow. 1) The table following provides you total utility (U) and marginal (MU) from consuming Salmon and Lobster. Suppose your total utility of Salmon consumption (U1) is a function of units (Q as pound or lbs.) of salmon consumed, as U1 = 400Q. Similarly, your total utility Lobster (U2) has the form as units (Q as lbs.) of lobster consumed, which is U2 = /36Q + 4- Now fill the empty spots in the table using the information given. Total utility and marginal utility of Salmon and Lobster. Copper River Salmon Atlantic Lobster Q (lbs.) U1 MU1 U2 MU2 1 20.00 20.00 8.72 8.72 4 8. 9. 10 both Salmon and Lobsters. To

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter10: Consumer Choice Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If marlow obtained 9 units of utility per dollar spent on apples and 6 units of utility per dollar spent on oranges, then Marlowe
Suppose that at current consumption levels an individual's marginal utility of consuming an extra sandwich is 10 whereas the marginal utility of consuming an extra coffee is 2. Then the MRS (of coffee for sandwiches) that is, the number of sandwiches the individual is willing to give up to get one more coffee is a 5 b. 2 C.1/2 d. 1/5
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Suppose that now Reese loses almost his entire income, so that he is left with only one dollar, i.e. his new income is I0 = 1. If prices are still px = 2, py = 4, what is his new optimal consumption of x and y (Hint: Remember that consumption of both goods must be weakly positive, i.e. x∗ ≥ 0 and y∗ ≥ 0) (a) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 0(b) x∗ = 0.25, y∗ = 0(c) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0.25(d) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0(e) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 1
Your sister’s utility function over the 2 goods X and Y is defined by: U (X,Y) = XY +4Y a. If she originally consumed 10 units of X and 24 units of Y, and if the consumption of X were increased to 12 units, how much Y would she be willing to give up and maintain the initial level of satisfaction? That is, how much less Y is needed in exchange for the increase in the consumption of X if she is to be equally satisfied before and after the change occurs? b. On a carefully constructed graph (you only need to consider X and Y values up to 50), indicate your sister’s original consumption position, with X plotted on the horizontal axis and Y on the vertical axis. Draw her indifference curve through the original consumption bundle from part a. As you can verify (or have already verified), she is indifferent to the points (10,24) and (12,21). If you double the amount of each good in these two consumption bundles, you would have the bundles (20,48) and (24,42). Since the two original bundles…
Which of the following statements is likely to be true about total utility as consumption increases? Group of answer choices Sophia receives a total utility of 5 from consuming the first burger, 10 after consuming the second, and 15 after the third. Benizir receives a total utility of 20 from consuming the first pancake, 15 after consuming the second, and 10 after the third. Jacob receives a total utility of 40 from consuming the first bowl of curry, 55 after consuming the second, and 65 after the third.
2. Tom spends all his $100 weekly income on two goods, apples and bananas. His utility function is given by U (A, B) = AB, where A and B stand for the quantity of apples and bananas consumed by Tom. If PA = $4 and PB= $10, how many apples and bananas will he consume? Make sure you write out the utility maximization problem explicitly, including the decision variable(s). What if his utility function is given by U (A, B) = A0.5B 0.5?
Suppose that each week Fiona buys 16 peaches and 4 apples at her local farmer's market. Both kinds of fruit cost $1 each. From this we can infer that: If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be greater than her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. Fiona is not maximizing her utility. If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be equal to her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. The law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold for Fiona.
Answer the question on the basis of the following two schedules, which show the amounts of additional satisfaction (marginal utility) that a consumer would get from successive quantities of products J and K. Units of J MUj Units of K MUk 1 56 1 32 2 48 2 28 3 32 3 24 4 24 4 20 5 20 5 12 6 16 6 10 7 12 7 8 If the consumer has money income of $52 and the prices of J and K are $8 and $4 respectively, the consumer will maximize her utility by purchasing Multiple Choice 3 units of J and 7 units of K. 5 units of J and 5 units of K. 4 units of J and 5 units of K. 6 units of J and 3 units of K.
Mats, who has reference-dependent preferences over beer and money, goes to the local pub with a friend, but is not planning on drinking any beer or spending any of his 50 Euro in cash. Let his end-of-evening outcomes in pints of beer consumed and cash be c1 and c2, respectively, and let his reference point in pints of beer and cash be r1 and r2, respectively. Then, Mats’ utility is given by v(6c1 − 6r1) + v(c2 − r2), where v(x) = x for x ≥ 0, and v(x) = 1.5x for x < 0. (a) Suppose that the price of beer is pB. Calculate Mats’ utility from drinking one pint of beer at this price. What is Mats’ utility from drinking no beer? And, comparing these two utility values, what is the maximum price pB that Mats would pay for one beer? (b) Suppose that Mats unexpectedly gets a pint of beer as part of a promotion at the pub, and incorporates its consumption into his reference point in beer. [Hint: this means that (r1, r2) = (1, 50).] Suppose that Mats could sell the beer at a price pS.…
Describe the two approaches of utility analysis !
You have the Cobb-Douglas utility function u(x,y) = xy over apples (x) and plums (y) and you have $120 budget to spend and can carry at most 480 ounces in weight in your backpack going back to the dorm. Each apple costs $1 and weighs 8 ounces, and each plum costs $3 and weighs 4 ounces. You can only leave the store with a bundle of fruits you can afford and carry. (a) Drawing the relevant lines, intercepts, marking the points and hence identifying the feasible set of bundles, calculate the optimal bundle. (b) Forget about (a). If you were to choose a backpack before going on this shopping trip, for the weight constraint not to be an issue for you, how many ounces of weight capacity would you need for your backpack? HINT: That is, for this weight capacity of the backpack, you’d be able to carry the best bundle you can afford, i.e, the weight constraint is not binding for your decision. ( c) Forget about (b). In (a), just before going out for shopping with your backpack to buy the…
You have £20 per week to spend, and two possible uses for this money: telephoning friends back home, and drinking coffee. Each hour of phoning costs £2, and each cup of coffee costs £1. Your utility function is U(X,Y) = XY, where X is the hours of phoning you do, and Y the number of cups of coffee you drink. What are your optimal choices? What is the resulting utility level? You can use the standard result on the constrained maximization of such a function, but must state it clearly. Now suppose the price of telephone calls drops to £1 per hour. What are your optimal choices? What is the resulting utility level? How much income per week will enable you to achieve the same quantities at the new prices as the ones you chose before? What income will enable you to attain the same utility as you did before? Comment on your answer in the context of equivalent variation and compensating variation.