Can you help me with this question. Im finding it quite difficult. In a two-good economy there are two equal-sized groups of people: type a have preferences given by 2 log(xa1) + log(xa2) and type b have preferenceslog(xb1)+2log(xb2) where xhi means consumption by a type h person of good i. The division of property is as follows: each a-person has an endowment of (30, k) units of the two goods; each b-person has an endowment of (60, 210−k) units, where k is some given number between 0 and 210. Assume that there is no production and that people can freely exchange goods to maximise their utility. If there is a competitive equilibrium, what are the individuals’ incomes (ya, yb) in equilibrium as a function of k?

Can you help me with this question. Im finding it quite difficult. In a two-good economy there are two equal-sized groups of people: type a have preferences given by 2 log(xa1) + log(xa2) and type b have preferenceslog(xb1)+2log(xb2) where xhi means consumption by a type h person of good i. The division of property is as follows: each a-person has an endowment of (30, k) units of the two goods; each b-person has an endowment of (60, 210−k) units, where k is some given number between 0 and 210. Assume that there is no production and that people can freely exchange goods to maximise their utility. If there is a competitive equilibrium, what are the individuals’ incomes (ya, yb) in equilibrium as a function of k?

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter4: Utility Maximization And Choice

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4.11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A possible explanation for the indecency might be the fact that the consumers are not all alive at the same time and therefore some mutually advantageous trades cannot occur. Consider an economy where consumer t receives an endowment of 1 unit of the single consumption good at time t and obtains utility only from consumption at times t and t + 1. All consumers meet at time 0 to trade. What is the equilibrium? Is exigency restored?
Consider an economy composed of 16 consumers. Of these, 5 consumers each own one right shoe and 11 consumers each own one left shoe. Shoes are indivisible. Everyone has the same utility function, which is Min(2R, L}, where R and L are, respectively, the quantities of right and left shoes con sumed. A) (10%) Is the status quo (where each individual has his own shoe) Pareto efficient? If so, briefly explain why. If not, provide a Pareto improvement b) (10%) Characterize all Pareto efficient allocations
So is this an example of: hometheic preferences, quasilinear preferences, or revealed preferences?
I need help with this question in my homework. Suppose a consumer’s utility function is given by U(X,Y) = MIN (5X, Y). Also, the consumer has $60 to spend, and the price of good X is P(x) = $5. Let good Y be a composite good (good Y is the “numeraire”) whose price is P(y) = $1. So, on the Y-axis, we are graphing the amount of money that the consumer has available to spend on all other goods for any given value of X. What is the Indirect Utility Function? What is the Expenditure Function?
What assumptions are necessary for supposing that individual preferences can be inferred and valued from the choices that individuals make?give a reason
Consider the utility functions below of two individuals, A and B, and bundles of goods Q and R. UA=X0.5Y0.5; UB=X+2Y; Bundle Q (10, 10); Bundle R (10, 15). Suppose the total X and total Y available in the economy are both equal to 20. a. If initially both individuals are consuming bundle Q, then a pareto-improvement is possible through reallocation of goods, i.e. individual A gives B some of his good X in exchange for some of individual B’s good Y. (True or False? Explain through mathematical examples).b. Pareto-optimality is achieved if we give individual B Bundle R and the remaining goods X and Y available in the economy is given to individual A. (True or false? Explain through a graphical example)
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Suppose that now Reese loses almost his entire income, so that he is left with only one dollar, i.e. his new income is I0 = 1. If prices are still px = 2, py = 4, what is his new optimal consumption of x and y (Hint: Remember that consumption of both goods must be weakly positive, i.e. x∗ ≥ 0 and y∗ ≥ 0) (a) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 0(b) x∗ = 0.25, y∗ = 0(c) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0.25(d) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0(e) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 1
Rosa received a corgi pillow as a raffle prize; she would have been willing to pay $18 to buy it herself. Based on the endowment effect, we would expect Rosa to be willing to sell the pillow.
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Which of the following is NOT true about Reese’s preference? (a) The MRS decreases when x increases.(b) The preferences are homothetic.(c) The marginal utility of y is higher when x = 10 than when x = 5.(d) For any a > 0, Reese prefers the bundle (x =a/2 , y = a/2 ) over either the bundle (x = a, y = 0) or (x = 0, y = a).
Suppose a family (with 1 child) earns $50,000 per year and there is no publicly provided education. Assume the price of other goods is $2,000 and the price for education/ year is $5,000. Draw the family's budget constraint. Show how free public education worth $20,000 per student changes the budget constraint. Draw a set of indifference curves to show that the family increases education consumption after b. Show how a school voucher redeemable for $20,000 worth of education changes the family's budget constraint. What happens to the amount of education the family purchases for the child?
Chris and Dana live in an exchange economy with two goods: good Q and good R. Chris starts off with an endowment of 6 units of Q and 10 units of R. Dana starts off with an endowment of 8 units of Q and 8 units of R. Suppose that the price of good R is pR=1 and the price of good Q is pQ=2. a )At these prices, does the market clear? Yes or no? Explain your answer. b) What relationship must hold between the consumption of each agent and the price of the two goods at the market clearing equilibrium? Write the equation
Student question Time Left :00:09:43Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X,Y) = 2X + Y UB(X,Y) = Min(X,Y) The initial endowments are: A: X = 5; Y = 3 B: X = 2; Y = 2 a. Illustrate the initial endowments in an Edgeworth Box. Be sure to label the Edgeworth Box carefully and accurately, and make sure the dimensions of the box are correct. Also, draw each consumer’s indifference curve that runs through the initial endowments. Is this initial endowment Pareto Efficient? b. Now suppose Consumer A gets all of both goods. Is this allocation Pareto Efficient? (You do not need to draw a new graph or illustrate this on the existing graph. Simply answer “yes” or “no.”) c. Now suppose Consumer B gets all of both goods. Is this allocation Pareto Efficient? (You do not need to draw a new graph or illustrate this on the existing graph. Simply answer “yes” or “no.”)