Maria, Bakka and Osing are the heirs of Jaime who died on September 1, 2019/ The properties of jaime comprised solely of real property valued at P50,000,000 at the time of death. The property is primarily deriving rental income.In 2020, the property remained undivided and it derived a net rental income of P15,000,000. What amount should each heir report in their individual returns as their share in the net rental income of the property they inherited

Maria, Bakka and Osing are the heirs of Jaime who died on September 1, 2019/ The properties of jaime comprised solely of real property valued at P50,000,000 at the time of death. The property is primarily deriving rental income.In 2020, the property remained undivided and it derived a net rental income of P15,000,000. What amount should each heir report in their individual returns as their share in the net rental income of the property they inherited

Individual Income Taxes

43rd Edition

ISBN:9780357109731

Author:Hoffman

Publisher:Hoffman

Chapter14: Property Transactions: Determination Of Gain Or Loss And Basis Considerations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 23CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Lori, who is single, purchased 5-year class property for 200,000 and 7-year class property for 420,000 on May 20, 2019. Lori expects the taxable income derived from her business (without regard to the amount expensed under 179) to be about 550,000. Lori has determined that she should elect immediate 179 expensing in the amount of 520,000, but she doesnt know which asset she should completely expense under 179. She does not claim any available additional first-year depreciation. a. Determine Loris total cost recovery deduction if the 179 expense is first taken with respect to the 5-year class asset. b. Determine Loris total cost recovery deduction if the 179 expense is first taken with respect to the 7-year class asset. c. What is your advice to Lori? d. Assume that Lori is in the 24% marginal tax state and Federal income bracket and that she elects 179 for the 7-year asset. Determine the present value of the tax savings from the cost recovery deductions for both assets. See Appendix H for present value factors, and assume a 6% discount rate. e. Assume the same facts as in part (d), except that Lori decides not to use 179 on either asset. Determine the present value of the tax savings under this choice. In addition, determine which option Lori should choose. f. Present your solution to parts (d) and (e) of the problem in a spreadsheet using appropriate Microsoft Excel formulas. E-mail your spreadsheet to your instructor with a two-paragraph summary of your findings.
Nell and Kirby are in the process of negotiating their divorce agreement, to be finalized in 2019. What should be the tax consequences to Nell and Kirby if the following, considered individually, became part of the agreement? a. In consideration for her one-half interest in their personal residence. Kirby will transfer to Nell stock with a value of 200,000 and 50,000 of cash. Kirbys cost of the stock was 150,000, and the value of the personal residence is 500,000. They purchased the residence three years ago for 300,000. b. Nell will receive 1,000 per month for 120 months. If she dies before receiving all 120 payments, the remaining payments will be made to her estate. c. Nell is to have custody of their 12-year-old son. Bobby. She is to receive 1,200 per month until Bobby (1) dies or (2) attains age 21 (whichever occurs first). After either of these events occurs, Nell will receive only 300 per month for the remainder of her life.
In 2019, Lou has a salary of $53,300 from her job. She also has interest income of $1,600 and dividend income of $ 400. Lou is single and has no dependents. During the year, Lou sold silver coins held as an investment for a $7,000 loss. Calculate the following amounts for Lou: Adjusted gross income $ ____________________ Standard deduction $ ____________________ Taxable income $ ____________________
Alicia and Rafel are in the process of negotiating a divorce agreement to be finalized in 2019. They both worked during the marriage and contributed an equal amount to the marital assets. They own a home with a fair market value of 400,000 (cost of 300,000) that is subject to a mortgage of 250,000. They have lived in the home for 12 years. They also have investment assets with a cost of 160,000 and a fair market value of 410,000. Thus, the net worth of the couple is 560,000 (400,000 250,000 + 410,000). The holding period for the investments is longer than one year. Alicia would like to continue to live in the house. Therefore, she has proposed that she receive the residence subject to the mortgage, a net value of 150,000. In addition, she would receive 17,600 each year for the next 10 years, which has a present value (at 6% interest) of 130,000. Rafel would receive the investment assets. If Rafel accepts this plan, he must sell one-half of the investments so that he can purchase a home. Assume that you are counseling Alicia. Explain to Alicia whether the proposed agreement would be fair on an after-tax basis.