Most economists favor a tax on carbon because Group of answer choices -The costs of carbon emissions have been underestimated by the market system and the tax would help businesses and consumers make better choices -Economists are in favor of anything that helps the government -That is not true. Most economists question climate change. -Taxes help to increase corporate profits

Most economists favor a tax on carbon because Group of answer choices -The costs of carbon emissions have been underestimated by the market system and the tax would help businesses and consumers make better choices -Economists are in favor of anything that helps the government -That is not true. Most economists question climate change. -Taxes help to increase corporate profits

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter32: The Land Market And Natural Resources

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Imagine you are working as a climate advisor to the federal government and they want to craft a bill to drastically reduce methane emissions in America. Which of the following policies would you recommend to them as the most effective in reducing methane? a. federal and state funding being directed to the western states for large scale forest management and fire prevention b. incentive programs to reduce meat production and consumption, while additionally subsidizing alternative diet options c. a nationwide waste management program focused on composting organic material to divert waste from landfills d. incentivizing solar panels to allow for affordable renewable energy that is competitive with market pricing for energy]
-Suppose the market-equilibrium quantity of good x is larger than the socially-optimal quantity of good x. Does the production of good x convey a positive externality or does it convey a negative externality?
A populous country's total greenhouse gas emissions may be relatively large even if its per capita emissions are relatively small. (China is the example the book uses to illustrate this phenomenon) True/False
How many dollars in subsidies have gone to fossil fuels (oil, coal, and natural gas) for every dollar that has gone to renewable energy (excluding hydropower)?
Suppose a small country, Country X, is considering implementing a Carbon Tax to address environmental concerns and reduce carbon emissions. The government believes that such a tax will have an impact on the country's economic performance. Given the following data: Current annual carbon emissions: 500,000 metric tons The government proposes a carbon tax of $30 per metric ton of carbon emitted. Calculate the potential change in annual carbon tax revenue if the country successfully reduces its carbon emissions by 20% after the implementation of the Carbon Tax.
Case: Despite 2015 Paris agreement, global carbon emissions increased 1.7 percent in 2017 and a further 2.7 percent in 2018; it has been estimated that the rate of increase in 2019 will be among the highest on record. The last four years have been the hottest on record, with 2019 on track to make it five. But analyses suggest that fast action now can reduce carbon emissions within 12 years and hold global increases below 2 degrees C and perhaps 1.5. Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco and India are expected to rise, they’ll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit. But some countries, such as Saudi Arabia, Russia, and United States, are not trying hard enough. a. Explain the inefficiency in this case! Use graphics b. Why can't this problem be solved through market mechanisms as in private goods? c. Give possible public (global) solutions and private (global) solutions to this and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Many economists favor a carbon tax as a way to discourage carbon emissions. Suppose such a tax were to be set at $20 per metric ton of carbon emissions (1 metric ton = 1,000 kilograms). Consider a 35% efficient coal-fired powerplant that produces 50MW of electricity. Given the carbon intensity of coal is 24gC/MJ, answer the following: a) What would the annual carbon tax be for this powerplant? Answer: $2.16 million/year b) A tree farm sequesters carbon at the rate of 5,000kg per year per acre over the 40-year life of the farm. What area of forest (in acres) would have to be planted to “offset” the powerplant’s emissions over the next 40 years (roughly the lifetime of the powerplant)? Answer: 21,600 acres c) How much could the powerplant operators pay for the forestry project (in $/acre-year) and still have it be cheaper than paying the $20 per metric ton carbon tax? Answer: $100/acre-year
Kenji and Paolo are considering contributing toward the creation of a building mural. Each can choose whether to contribute $300 to the building mural or to keep that $300 for a new suit. Since a building mural is a public good, both Kenji and Paolo will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.70 of benefit. For example, if both Kenji and Paolo choose to contribute, then a total of $600 would be contributed to the building mural. So, Kenji and Paolo would each receive $420 of benefit from the building mural, and their combined benefit would be $840. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a new suit is a private good, if Kenji chooses to spend $300 on a new suit, Kenji would get $300 of benefit from the new suit and Paolo wouldn't receive any benefit from Kenji's choice. If Kenji still spends $300 on a new suit and Paolo chooses to contribute $300 to the…
Do you agree that carbon tax is the key factor behind Ford Australia’s decision to stop production? Do you think Ford will still close even without the carbon tax? Justify your answer. please answer
Paolo and Van are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the water fountain or to keep that $400 for a weekend getaway. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Paolo and Van will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.80 of benefit. For example, if both Paolo and Van choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the water fountain. So, Paolo and Van would each receive $640 of benefit from the water fountain, and their combined benefit would be $1,280. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a weekend getaway is a private good, if Paolo chooses to spend $400 on a weekend getaway, Paolo would get $400 of benefit from the weekend getaway and Van wouldn't receive any benefit from Paolo's choice. If Paolo still spends $400 on a weekend getaway and Van chooses to…
Beth and Eleanor are considering contributing toward the creation of a building mural. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the building mural or to keep that $400 for a weekend getaway. Since a building mural is a public good, both Beth and Eleanor will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.60 of benefit. For example, if both Beth and Eleanor choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the building mural. So, Beth and Eleanor would each receive $480 of benefit from the building mural, and their combined benefit would be $960. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a weekend getaway is a private good, if Beth chooses to spend $400 on a weekend getaway, Beth would get $400 of benefit from the weekend getaway and Eleanor wouldn't receive any benefit from Beth's choice. If Beth still spends $400 on a weekend getaway and…
In a hypothetical country, the government introduces a new policy aimed at combating global warming. As part of this policy, they impose a carbon tax of $20 per ton of CO2 emissions on industries. Prior to the tax, the country's industrial sector emits 800,000 tons of CO2 annually. After the implementation of the tax, the industrial sector reduces its emissions to 600,000 tons of CO2 annually. Calculate the following: The reduction in CO2 emissions as a result of the carbon tax. The total revenue collected by the government from the carbon tax. If the government uses all the revenue collected from the carbon tax to subsidize renewable energy projects, and each project receives $25,000, how many projects can be funded with the total revenue? (Note: Assume no other external factors influencing CO2 emissions, and all calculations are based on the data provided.)