Nash equilibrium can be defined as the competitive outcome where _____ A. all firms set prices equal to average cost and all firms make economic profit. B. each firm sets a price equal to marginal cost and each firm makes economic profit. C. each firm sets a price higher than marginal cost and each firm makes economic profit. D. each firm sets a price lower than marginal cost and each firm makes economic profit. E. firms set a price lower than average cost and all firms make economic profit.

Nash equilibrium can be defined as the competitive outcome where _____ A. all firms set prices equal to average cost and all firms make economic profit. B. each firm sets a price equal to marginal cost and each firm makes economic profit. C. each firm sets a price higher than marginal cost and each firm makes economic profit. D. each firm sets a price lower than marginal cost and each firm makes economic profit. E. firms set a price lower than average cost and all firms make economic profit.

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

a)Find the Nash equilibrium b)Find subgame Nash equilibrium c) Explain why all Nash equilibrium are not subgame perfect. Please see the image The term in image are A,B b,c and w,a and 1,2,7,9 and 7,3,4,8
Explain the meaning of Nash equilibrium when firms are competing with respect to price. Why is the equilibrium stable? Why don’t hey raise prices to maximize joint profits?
Imagine that you are advising a small new car dealership. They ask:A) given the information below, what is the best price they should put on all the cars, assuming every buyer pays the same price and how much profit will they make? B) is there a better way to make profits and how much profit could they make? why might this strategy be difficult to use? The firm can't change their costs. But they could use a different pricing scheme, not charging every customer the same price. Fixed cost for business is $4000 Variable cost is $20,000 for each car they get from the manufacturer. They anticipate the following customers. Ms. Rich would pay up to $30,000 Mr. Upper Middle would pay up to $26,000 Ms. Middle would pay up to $22,000 Mr. Lower Middle would pay up to $18,000 Ms. Poor would pay up to $16,000
1. Find all subgame perfect nash equilibrium 2. Find a nash equilibrium that is not SPNE, and explain why it is not an SPNE.
What issues do the online businesses face? How are they similar to offline competition? How are these issues resolved (market v. nonmarket) in the online and offline business? Use the theory fo the 4 Is. Issues are understood as moral concerns, consequences, justice, and rights at stake which can be resolved by either market or non-market action.
a. John operates a firm producing t shirts. There are many such firms producingidentical products to John. What market structure is this? Is it possible for John tomake a profit in the long run? Illustrate using an appropriate diagram. b. John decides to innovate his business and begins printing t shirts with customercreated content. Will John be able to make a profit in the short run and the longrun? Explain using relevant diagrams and comment on the implied market c. Provide a strategy for John to make greater than normal profits in the long run. Isthis likely to be the case in the market for this good?
1. Consider the pricing game between firm 1 (row) and firm 2 (column) belowwhere each number represents the profits made by each firm.:Table 1: Pricing gameLow HighLow 288,288 360,216High 216,360 324,324 a) Point out the Nash equilibrium. Is this a unique Nash equilibrium?c) What type of commitment can firm 1 make to improve its pay-off?Can it be classified as a threat or promise? (Assume that the commitmentis credible.)d) How would you represent the game as a game tree with the option tocommit?2. Consider the signalling / production game with the order of play given below.Assuming that the signal is informative (i.e. education is sufficiently costly),how would you change the order of the game to make sure that poolingequilibriums are ruled out? Verbally motivate your answer.• Nature chooses ability of the workers a ∈ (H, L), ability is observed byworkers but not employers.• The worker choose an education level s ∈ (0, 1).• The employer offer contracts w(s).• The worker accepts or…
What is a Process of Deciding on a Competitive Approach? What is a Strategic Thinking of Deciding on Competitive Scope? Why is it important?
1. What are the 5 characteristics of perfect competition? 2. Define the followings? A. Monopoly B. Oligopoly C. Duopoly D. Perfect competition E. Knockoffs 3. What is a Resource Market? 4. What are the 4 types of resources in economics and define each? 5. What is an example of game theory in economics? 6. If you are the manager/owner of the company, what will you do to solve the negative effect of perfect competition?
Consider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are shown in the image attached. a) What is the dominant strategy for the United States? For Mexico? Explain. b) Define Nash equilibrium. What is the Nash equilibrium for trade policy? c) In 1993, the U.S. Congress ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement, in which the United States and Mexico agreed to reduce trade barriers simultaneously. Do the perceived payoffs shown here justify this approach to trade policy? Explain.
How would you solve for the Nash equilibrium total output, and total market profit? (see image))
Consider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are as follows a. What is the dominant strategy for the United States? For Mexico? Explain. b. Define Nash equilibrium. What is the Nash equilibrium for trade policy? c. In 1993, the U.S.Congress ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement, in which the United States and Mexico agreed to reduce trade barriers simultaneously. Do the perceived payoffs shown here justify this approach to trade policy? Explain. d. Based on your understanding of the gains from trade (discussed in Chapters 3 and 9), do you think that these payoffs actually reflect a nation's welfare under the four possible outcomes?