O Ho: PI = P2 versus H: Pi P2SOLVE: Assume the samples can be thought of as an SRS. We can conduct a hypothesiss test since there are more thanfive successes (correctly identified the pairs) and more than five failures in each sample. Calculate i. ê2, and p. (Enteryour answers rounded to four decimal places.)PI =P2 =Compute the z test statistic. (Enter your answer rounded to four decimal places.)z =Using the software of your choice, calculate the one-sided P-value for the null hypothesis. (Enter your answer roundedto three decimal places.)P =CONCLUDE: Which conclusion is correct?O There is enough evidence to conclude that blacking out the mouth region reduces a subject's ability to correctlymatch dog-owner pairs.O There is not enough evidence to conclude that blacking out the mouth region reduces a subject's ability to correctlymatch dog-owner pairs.(b) Is there evidence that blacking out the eyes reduces a subject's ability to choose the sheet which correctly matches thedogs and their owners?STATE: We want to know if blacking out the eye region reduces a subject's ability to correctly match the dog-ownerpairs. Researchers created two test sheets, each sheet showing 20 photos of the faces of dog-owner pairs. The two sheets wereequivalent with respect to breed, diversity of appearance, and gender of owners. On the first sheet the dogs were matchedwith their owners, while on the second sheet the dogs and owners were deliberately mismatched. Three experiments wereconducted, and in all experiments, subjects were asked to "choose the set of dog-owner pairs that resemble each other,Sheet 1 or Sheet 2," and were simply told the aim of the research was a "survey on dog-owner relationships." In the firstexperiment, the original sheets were shown to subjects; in the second experiment, just the mouth region of the ownerswas blacked out in all the pictures on both sheets; while in the third experiment, just the "eye region" of the owners wasblacked out. Subjects were assigned at random to the three experimental groups, and in each experiment, the number ofsubjects who selected the sheet with the dogs and their owners correctly matched was recorded. Experimenters wereinterested in whether blacking out portions of the faced reduced the ability of subjects to correctly match dogs andowners. The results are displayed.Number ofNumber CorrectlyExperimentSubjectsMatchedExperiment 16149Experiment 2 (mouth5137blacked out)Experiment 3 (eyesblacked out)6030(a) Is there evidence that blacking out the mouth reduces a subject's ability to choose the sheet which correctly matchesthe dogs and their owners?Use the four-step process to answer the question.STATE: Which choice best describes the statement of this experiment/study.O We want to know if blacking out the mouth region reduces a subject's ability to correctly match the dog-ownerpairs.O This is an observational study, since the variable of interest is measured but there is no attempt to influence theresponses.O This is an experiment, since it includes two independent samples.O This is an experiment, since the samples are taken randomly.O This is an observational study, since it applies to female Hispanic drivers alone.PLAN: To examine whether the null hypothesis is true we should test the hypotheses:O Ho: PI = P2 versus H.: Pi P2O Ilo: PI = P, versus H: PI P2SOLVE: Assume the samples can be thought of as an SRS. We can conduct a hvpothesiss test since there are more thanQuestion SourcDEL

Name: O Ho: PI = P2 versus H: Pi < P.O Ho: PI + P2 versus H.: PI = P2O Ho:
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: O Ho: PI = P2 versus H: Pi P2SOLVE: Assume the samples can be thought of as an SRS. We can conduct a hypothesiss test since there are more thanfive successes (correctly identified the

Question

O Ho: PI = P2 versus H: Pi < P.O Ho: PI + P2 versus H.: PI = P2O Ho: PI = P2 versus H: Pi > P2SOLVE: Assume the samples can be thought of as an SRS. We can conduct a hypothesiss test since there are more thanfive successes (correctly identified the pairs) and more than five failures in each sample. Calculate i. ê2, and p. (Enteryour answers rounded to four decimal places.)PI =P2 =Compute the z test statistic. (Enter your answer rounded to four decimal places.)z =Using the software of your choice, calculate the one-sided P-value for the null hypothesis. (Enter your answer roundedto three decimal places.)P =CONCLUDE: Which conclusion is correct?O There is enough evidence to conclude that blacking out the mouth region reduces a subject's ability to correctlymatch dog-owner pairs.O There is not enough evidence to conclude that blacking out the mouth region reduces a subject's ability to correctlymatch dog-owner pairs.(b) Is there evidence that blacking out the eyes reduces a subject's ability to choose the sheet which correctly matches thedogs and their owners?STATE: We want to know if blacking out the eye region reduces a subject's ability to correctly match the dog-ownerpairs. Researchers created two test sheets, each sheet showing 20 photos of the faces of dog-owner pairs. The two sheets wereequivalent with respect to breed, diversity of appearance, and gender of owners. On the first sheet the dogs were matchedwith their owners, while on the second sheet the dogs and owners were deliberately mismatched. Three experiments wereconducted, and in all experiments, subjects were asked to "choose the set of dog-owner pairs that resemble each other,Sheet 1 or Sheet 2," and were simply told the aim of the research was a "survey on dog-owner relationships." In the firstexperiment, the original sheets were shown to subjects; in the second experiment, just the mouth region of the ownerswas blacked out in all the pictures on both sheets; while in the third experiment, just the "eye region" of the owners wasblacked out. Subjects were assigned at random to the three experimental groups, and in each experiment, the number ofsubjects who selected the sheet with the dogs and their owners correctly matched was recorded. Experimenters wereinterested in whether blacking out portions of the faced reduced the ability of subjects to correctly match dogs andowners. The results are displayed.Number ofNumber CorrectlyExperimentSubjectsMatchedExperiment 16149Experiment 2 (mouth5137blacked out)Experiment 3 (eyesblacked out)6030(a) Is there evidence that blacking out the mouth reduces a subject's ability to choose the sheet which correctly matchesthe dogs and their owners?Use the four-step process to answer the question.STATE: Which choice best describes the statement of this experiment/study.O We want to know if blacking out the mouth region reduces a subject's ability to correctly match the dog-ownerpairs.O This is an observational study, since the variable of interest is measured but there is no attempt to influence theresponses.O This is an experiment, since it includes two independent samples.O This is an experiment, since the samples are taken randomly.O This is an observational study, since it applies to female Hispanic drivers alone.PLAN: To examine whether the null hypothesis is true we should test the hypotheses:O Ho: PI = P2 versus H.: Pi P2O Ilo: PI = P, versus H: PI < P2Ho: PI + P2 versus 1: PI = P2O Ho: Pi = p: versus H: Pi > P2SOLVE: Assume the samples can be thought of as an SRS. We can conduct a hvpothesiss test since there are more thanQuestion SourcDEL

Accepted Answer

(a)
STATE : Correct choice that best describes the statement of this experiment/study :
We want to…