Only about 17% of all people can wiggle their ears. Is this percent lower for millionaires? Of the 319 millionaires surveyed, 45 could wiggle their ears. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: (please enter a decimal) H1: (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic t v (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value - (Please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) e. The p-value is sva f. Based on this, we should fail to reject g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... v the null hypothesis. O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 17% at o = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is lower than 17%. OThe data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 17% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is lower than 17%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 17% at a 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is equal to 17%.
Only about 17% of all people can wiggle their ears. Is this percent lower for millionaires? Of the 319 millionaires surveyed, 45 could wiggle their ears. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: (please enter a decimal) H1: (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic t v (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value - (Please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) e. The p-value is sva f. Based on this, we should fail to reject g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... v the null hypothesis. O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 17% at o = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is lower than 17%. OThe data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 17% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is lower than 17%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 17% at a 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is equal to 17%.
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
1st Edition
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8CR
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning