oup of 80 people who had been diagnosed as prediabetic because of high blood glucose levels rticipate in a study designed to investigate the use of cinnamon to reduce blood glucose to a n e 80 people, 40 were randomly assigned to take a cinnamon tablet each day and the other 40 ke a placebo each day. The people did not know which tablet they were taking. Their blood gl measured at the end of one month. The results showed that 14 people in the cinnamon group e placebo group had normal blood glucose levels. For people similar to those in the study, do i ide convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after g cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month amon? No conclusion can be made about the use of cinnamon because the people in the study were v- са There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05 but not at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10 but not at the level of 0.05. There is not convincing statistical evidence at anyy reasonable significance level
oup of 80 people who had been diagnosed as prediabetic because of high blood glucose levels rticipate in a study designed to investigate the use of cinnamon to reduce blood glucose to a n e 80 people, 40 were randomly assigned to take a cinnamon tablet each day and the other 40 ke a placebo each day. The people did not know which tablet they were taking. Their blood gl measured at the end of one month. The results showed that 14 people in the cinnamon group e placebo group had normal blood glucose levels. For people similar to those in the study, do i ide convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after g cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month amon? No conclusion can be made about the use of cinnamon because the people in the study were v- са There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05 but not at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10 but not at the level of 0.05. There is not convincing statistical evidence at anyy reasonable significance level
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
1st Edition
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8CR
Related questions
Question
What is correct?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill