Papine Campus. The strategies are to "Enter" or "Don't Enter". If either firm plays Don't Enter, it earns 0 profits. If one firm plays Enter and the other plays Don't Enter, the Firm that plays Enter earns $300,000 per year in profits (Don't enter always yields 0 profits). If both firms choose to play Enter, both lose $100,000 per year as there is not enough demand for two restaurants to make positive profits. The payoff matrix below shows the payoffs for two restaurants BK Don't Enter 3,0 Enter Enter Don't Enter -1,-1 0,3 0,0 Payoffs are in units of $100,000 a. What are the Nash equilibria of this game? b. Is there a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium in game? If so, what is it? c. Calculate the expected Nash equilibrium payoff for KFC and BK respectively

Papine Campus. The strategies are to "Enter" or "Don't Enter". If either firm plays Don't Enter, it earns 0 profits. If one firm plays Enter and the other plays Don't Enter, the Firm that plays Enter earns $300,000 per year in profits (Don't enter always yields 0 profits). If both firms choose to play Enter, both lose $100,000 per year as there is not enough demand for two restaurants to make positive profits. The payoff matrix below shows the payoffs for two restaurants BK Don't Enter 3,0 Enter Enter Don't Enter -1,-1 0,3 0,0 Payoffs are in units of $100,000 a. What are the Nash equilibria of this game? b. Is there a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium in game? If so, what is it? c. Calculate the expected Nash equilibrium payoff for KFC and BK respectively

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305585126

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5CQQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Film A) is large and the other film (Film B) is small, as the prisoners dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. Assuming that both films know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?
1. Consider the pricing game between firm 1 (row) and firm 2 (column) belowwhere each number represents the profits made by each firm.:Table 1: Pricing gameLow HighLow 288,288 360,216High 216,360 324,324 a) Point out the Nash equilibrium. Is this a unique Nash equilibrium?c) What type of commitment can firm 1 make to improve its pay-off?Can it be classified as a threat or promise? (Assume that the commitmentis credible.)d) How would you represent the game as a game tree with the option tocommit?2. Consider the signalling / production game with the order of play given below.Assuming that the signal is informative (i.e. education is sufficiently costly),how would you change the order of the game to make sure that poolingequilibriums are ruled out? Verbally motivate your answer.• Nature chooses ability of the workers a ∈ (H, L), ability is observed byworkers but not employers.• The worker choose an education level s ∈ (0, 1).• The employer offer contracts w(s).• The worker accepts or…
high low high 11, 11 2,18 low 18, 2 10,10 Suppose there are only two firms that sell tablets: Padmania and Capturesque. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its tablets. For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Padmania prices low and Capturesque prices high, Padmania will earn a profit of $18 million, and Capturesque will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Padmania and Capturesque are both profit-maximizing firms. If the firms do not collude, what strategies will they end up choosing? 1. Padmania will choose a low price, and Capturesque will choose a high price. 2. Both Padmania and Capturesque will choose a high price. 3. Padmania will choose a high price, and Capturesque will choose a low price. 4. Both Padmania and Capturesque will choose a low price. True or False: The…
1. Find pure strategy Nash equilibrium and find the outcome, that will be played in cooperation. Explain clearly.