Peter has just graduated from high school. He will live for three more periods and is considering three alternative education-work options. He can start working right away, earning $100,000 in period 1, $110,000 in period 2, and $90,000 in period 3. He can also go to college in period 1, spending $10,000 in tuition and books in that period, and then earn $150,000 in periods 2 and 3. Finally, he can get a doctorate degree in period 2 after completing his college education. If he gets a doctorate degree he will not need to pay for tuition or books in period 2 (he will receive a fellowship) and he will earn $300,000 in period 3. The rate of discount is 20 percent. What should Peter do? (Hint: Assume period one is the current period.)

Peter has just graduated from high school. He will live for three more periods and is considering three alternative education-work options. He can start working right away, earning $100,000 in period 1, $110,000 in period 2, and $90,000 in period 3. He can also go to college in period 1, spending $10,000 in tuition and books in that period, and then earn $150,000 in periods 2 and 3. Finally, he can get a doctorate degree in period 2 after completing his college education. If he gets a doctorate degree he will not need to pay for tuition or books in period 2 (he will receive a fellowship) and he will earn $300,000 in period 3. The rate of discount is 20 percent. What should Peter do? (Hint: Assume period one is the current period.)

Principles of Microeconomics

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305156050

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter1: Ten Principles Of Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider Sara as she goes through life. Is she destined to stay in the same income quintile her whole life, not able to move up the economic ladder? Question 9 options: A) In her early twenties, she may live with two room mates in an apartment while going to school and working part time and be in the second quintile. B) In her mid-forties, she could be the successful owner of a small business and be in the 4th quintile. C) In her sixties, Sara sells her business for $400,000 and for one year is in the top quintile, before settling into modest retirement in the 3rd quintile. D) All of the above are possible, showing that people over the course of their lives are not stuck in one quintile.
Jonathan is a single father with one child. He can work as a server for $6 per hour for up to 1,500 hours per year. He is eligible for welfare, and so if he does not earn any income, he will receive a total of 10,000 per year. He can work and still receive government benefits, but for every 1 of income, his welfare stipend is 1 less. Create a table similar to Table 15.4 that shows Jonathans options. Use four columns, the first showing number of hours to work, the second showing his earnings from work, the third showing the government benefits he will receive, and the fourth column showing his total income (earnings + government support). Sketch a labor-leisure diagram of Jonathans opportunity set with and without government support.
1. If the sales tax increases to 12%, what percentage of our Archie's income will jeff now pay in text on his $150 bill? Show your work. 2. Will he make adjustments to his purchases and if yes, how will he adjust? If no, why not? 3. If the sales tax increases to 12%, what percentage of Jeff's income will Archie pay in tax on his $150 bill? Show your work.
1. Suppose a new drug was discovered that slowed the deterioration of health that accompanies aging. (All the graphs you draw should include labels, down and right arrows to indicate the changes before and after the new drug were discovered) a. What's the effect on the available time for work Tw and play Tz? Draw its labor–leisure graph including both budget constraints and indifference curve. b. What's the effect on optimal health H* ? Draw its marginal efficiency of capital (MEC) curve. c. Draw the production possibilities frontier. Explain it.
a) If a nation in which the volume of goods and services is growing by 5 percent per year and its if the population is growing more than 5 percent a year, the increase per capita will be more than 5 percent. True False b) Individuals have two choices with their income: they can spend it or save it. True False
Which one would you choose? why or why not? a. Present value of 500,000 as a lifetime income due to education or b. Present value of 100,000 as a lifetime income without an education
In what ways is your standard of living differentfrom that of your parents or grandparents when theywere your age? Why have these changes occurred?
Remember to illustrate diagramatically for some of these parts! 6. Assume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. a) Derive and plot the feasible set, between daily values of consumption c, and “leisure”, l. Label the values at the intercepts (the points where the feasible frontier cuts the two axes). b) Assume that your optimal choice of consumption and leisure is to work 8 hours per day. Illustrate this choice diagrammatically using the feasible set and indifference curves. c) Use indifference curves and the feasible set to show why, given the properties of the optimal choice in part b), it is not optimal to work, say, 10, or 6 hours per day. d) Now assume that you receive an income of £140 per week from an unknown benefactor. Show the impact on your feasible set, and show a new optimal choice in which consumption increases…
Discuss each of the following: 1. How does household income affect the desire of a parent to have children? 2. How does religion affect the desire of a parent to have children?
Madison has a full-time job, but she is considering going back to school for a master’s degree.Describe how Madison might decide whether ornot to continue her education.
Please no written by hand solution Assume a society consists of two economic? groups: one group is rich and the other group is poor. Suppose that 50 percent of the population is rich while the other 50 percent of the population is poor. Consider two scenarios. Scenario? A: The rich have ?$60000 ?each, while the poor have ?$2000 each. Scenario? B: The rich have ?$7500 ?each, while the poor have ?$750 each. If you only care about average income and not about? equity, you would prefer ? a or b ?, which has an average income of ?$ ________. ?(Enter your response to the nearest dollar?.) Now suppose that you only care about equity or inequality. In this? case, you would prefer ? Scenario B or Scenario A ?, which has a? rich-to-poor ratio of ________. ?(Round your response to one decimal place?.) ?Finally, suppose you only care about living standards. In this? case, you would prefer ? Scenario B or Scenario A because it has lower poverty.
What is the advantage of capital gains treatment of income compared to expensing? Explain using natural resources as an example. a. Why are capital gains considered as beneficial to natural resources stewardship and development? b. Explain how the calculation of taxes owed would be calculated.