Pitt Company is considering twoalternative investments. The companyrequires a 12% return from itsinvestments. Neither option has asalvage value.Project XProject YInitial investment$180,000$118,000Net cash flows anticipated:Year 182,00059,00092,00081,00076,00035,00055,00072,00068,00027,000Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Calculate the Net PresentValue for each project andindicate which the PittCompany should choose.

The net present value is used to evaluate the present value of the cash flows at the required rate…

Pitt Company is considering two alternative investments. The company requires a 12% return from its investments. Neither option has a salvage value. Project X Project Y Initial investment $180,000 $118,000 Net cash flows anticipated: 35,000 55,000 72,000 68,000 27,000 Year 1 82,000 59,000 92,000 81,000 76,000 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Calculate the Net Present Value for each project and indicate which the Pitt Company should choose.

Pitt Company is considering two alternative investments. The company requires a 12% return from its investments. Neither option has a salvage value. Project X Project Y Initial investment $180,000 $118,000 Net cash flows anticipated: 35,000 55,000 72,000 68,000 27,000 Year 1 82,000 59,000 92,000 81,000 76,000 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Calculate the Net Present Value for each project and indicate which the Pitt Company should choose.

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter11: Capital Budgeting And Risk

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Fenton, Inc., has established a new strategic plan that calls for new capital investment. The company has a 9.8% required rate of return and an 8.3% cost of capital. Fenton currently has a return of 10% on its other investments. The proposed new investments have equal annual cash inflows expected. Management used a screening procedure of calculating a payback period for potential investments and annual cash flows, and the IRR for the 7 possible investments are displayed in image. Each investment has a 6-year expected useful life and no salvage value. A. Identify which project(s) is/are unacceptable and briefly state the conceptual justification as to why each of your choices is unacceptable. B. Assume Fenton has $330,000 available to spend. Which remaining projects should Fenton invest in and in what order? C. If Fenton was not limited to a spending amount, should they invest in all of the projects given the company is evaluated using return on investment?
Staten Corporation is considering two mutually exclusive projects. Both require an initial outlay of 150,000 and will operate for five years. The cash flows associated with these projects are as follows: Statens required rate of return is 10%. Using the net present value method and the present value table provided in Appendix A, which of the following actions would you recommend to Staten? a. Accept Project X and reject Project Y. b. Accept Project Y and reject Project X. c. Accept Projects X and Y. d. Reject Projects X and Y.
Buena Vision Clinic is considering an investment that requires an outlay of 600,000 and promises a net cash inflow one year from now of 810,000. Assume the cost of capital is 10 percent. Required: 1. Break the 810,000 future cash inflow into three components: a. The return of the original investment b. The cost of capital c. The profit earned on the investment 2. Now, compute the present value of the profit earned on the investment. 3. Compute the NPV of the investment. Compare this with the present value of the profit computed in Requirement 2. What does this tell you about the meaning of NPV?
Project S has a cost of $10,000 and is expected to produce benefits (cash flows) of $3,000 per year for 5 years. Project L costs $25,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $7,400 per year for 5 years. Calculate the two projects’ NPVs, IRRs, MIRRs, and PIs, assuming a cost of capital of 12%. Which project would be selected, assuming they are mutually exclusive, using each ranking method? Which should actually be selected?
EQUIVALENT ANNUAL ANNUITY A firm has two mutually exclusive investment projects to evaluate. The projects have the following cash flows: Time Cash Flow X Cash Flow Y 0 (80,000) (75,000) 1 40,000 35,000 2 60,000 35,000 3 70,000 35,000 4 _ 35,000 5 _ 5,000 Projects X and Y are equally risky and may be repeated indefinitely. If the firms WACC is 10%, what is the EAA of the project that adds the most value to the firm? (Round your final answer to the nearest whole dollar.)
Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: The companys capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Instructions 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. 2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. Round to one decimal place. 3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2). By placing the computed amounts in the first two columns on the left and by placing a check mark in the appropriate column to the right, indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. 4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 12% and the present value table appearing in Exhibit 2 of this chapter. 5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places. 6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4). 7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5). 8. Based on the analyses, comment on the relative attractiveness of the proposals ranked in parts (6) and (7).